Inquiries · Recommendations
Public Inquiry Recommendations
1,814 tracked recommendations
35 inquiries
188 match current filters
Page 2 of 4
Recommendations issued by UK statutory and non-statutory inquiries, with their tracked government response and supporting evidence.
Browse by inquiry
| Inquiry | Recs | Accepted |
|---|---|---|
| Mid Staffs Inquiry | 290 | 281 |
| Manchester Arena Inquiry | 169 | 169 |
| IICSA | 107 | 96 |
| Muckamore Abbey Inquiry | 106 | — |
| Grenfell Tower Inquiry | 104 | 104 |
| Infected Blood Inquiry | 103 | 102 |
| Hyponatraemia Inquiry | 96 | 96 |
| Fuller Inquiry | 92 | 71 |
| Leveson Inquiry | 92 | 77 |
| Vale of Leven Inquiry | 75 | 75 |
| Baha Mousa Inquiry | 73 | 72 |
| Southport Inquiry | 67 | — |
| RHI Inquiry | 45 | 44 |
| COVID-19 Inquiry | 44 | 24 |
| Morecambe Bay Investigation | 44 | 44 |
| Brook House Inquiry | 33 | 28 |
| Bichard Inquiry | 31 | 31 |
| Angiolini Inquiry | 30 | 29 |
| Post Office Horizon Inquiry | 27 | 25 |
| Jermaine Baker Inquiry | 26 | 22 |
| Edinburgh Tram Inquiry | 24 | 21 |
| Daniel Morgan Panel | 23 | 21 |
| Cranston Inquiry | 18 | — |
| Paterson Inquiry | 17 | 15 |
| HIA Inquiry | 12 | 12 |
| Scottish Hospitals Inquiry | 11 | 11 |
| Anthony Grainger Inquiry | 9 | 9 |
| Al-Sweady Inquiry | 9 | 9 |
| Hillsborough Panel | 9 | 5 |
| Fingerprint Inquiry | 9 | 9 |
| ICL Inquiry | 7 | 6 |
| Litvinenko Inquiry | 5 | 5 |
| Azelle Rodney Inquiry | 3 | 3 |
| Billy Wright Inquiry | 3 | 3 |
| Penrose Inquiry | 1 | 1 |
Recommendations
| Code | Recommendation | Inquiry | Response |
|---|---|---|---|
| R36 |
Seclusion as extraordinary intervention with serious event audit
Use of seclusion should be considered an extraordinary and exceptional intervention. Each intervention should be subject to a serious event audit, conducted …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R37 |
Human rights-based restrictive practices training
Education and training on the use of restrictive practices should be grounded in human rights principles and the dedicated human rights specialist …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R38 |
Clear pathways for raising concerns
People with learning disabilities and autistic people and their families should be provided with clear, written information outlining the available pathways for …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R39 |
Guidance on recording and presenting concerns
People with learning disabilities and autistic people and their families should be provided with a short description of how best to record …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R40 |
Record all complaints in electronic system
In HSCTs all complaints, regardless of whether they are resolved immediately at ward level, should be recorded in the Trust’s electronic complaints …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R41 |
Inform complainants of complaint management process
Complainants should immediately be informed of how their complaint will be managed (locally or through the corporate complaints process) along with a …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R42 |
Regular updates on complaint progress
Complainants must be regularly updated and informed of the progress of any investigation, including when the process concludes without a specific finding.
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R43 |
Red-rated complaints shared with all NEDs
All complaints managed at corporate level and rated as red (using the red, amber and green (RAG) rating matrix) should be shared …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R44 |
Proactive quality assurance beyond complaints
Complaints alone are a poor indicator of quality of care, particularly in a vulnerable population such as those admitted to MAH. A …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R45 |
Incident trend analysis on board dashboards
Incident reports of any violent or aggressive behaviour by either people with learning disabilities and autistic people or staff should be analysed …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R46 |
Lived experience feedback via external agency
Where people with learning disabilities can participate, the provider should actively seek their lived experience feedback in relation to staff attitudes and …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R47 |
Quarterly family feedback via external agency
The provider should actively seek family or carer feedback on the service user’s experience on a quarterly basis via an external agency …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R48 |
Holistic safeguarding governance review
HSCTs must review and improve governance of safeguarding to ensure that findings from different safeguarding investigations are considered holistically, synthesised and presented …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R49 |
CCTV in high-risk learning disability settings
Hospital settings for people with learning disabilities and autistic people are very high-risk environments for abuse and poor practice, partly because those …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R50 |
CCTV guidelines for residential and day services
Guidelines should be agreed in relation to providing CCTV systems in residential and day services where requested. Guidelines should be agreed by …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R51 |
CCTV in non-public areas only in best interests
The installation of CCTV in non-public areas should be considered only where this will be in the best interests of the individual …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R52 |
CCTV policies agreed with staff residents and families
Policies governing the use of CCTV should be agreed only after consultation with staff, residents and their families using the service.
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R53 |
CCTV viewing circumstances
Policies should include careful consideration of the circumstances in which the CCTV should be viewed; for example, that it should be viewed …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R54 |
Independent CCTV viewers
Viewers of the CCTV should be independent of the setting, i.e. not involved in day-to-day care of the residents.
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R55 |
External CCTV oversight
Oversight of the CCTV analysis should sit outside the setting in which the CCTV is recording, and should include audits of referrals …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R56 |
CCTV referral guidance for police
Policies should include clear guidance and definitions of behaviour and circumstances in which information should be passed to PSNI about possible offences.
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R57 |
Regulator access to CCTV
Policies should be clear about the circumstances in which a regulator, such as RQIA, could access the CCTV.
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R58 |
CCTV for staff training consideration
Those drafting the policy should consider whether CCTV could ever be used for staff training and, if so, how this would be …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R59 |
CCTV explained in accessible format
All service users and their families should have the CCTV explained to them in easily understood language and with easy access materials, …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R60 |
Staff CCTV training
All staff should receive training on the reasons for the use of CCTV and the processes for its analysis.
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R61 |
Statutory adult safeguarding function
Vulnerable children and adults are inherently more susceptible to abuse or neglect than other people. Adult safeguarding should be formally recognised as …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R62 |
Monthly safeguarding dashboard
Metrics on both child and adult safeguarding processes should be reported monthly via a safeguarding dashboard, with the same visibility and status …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R63 |
Peer-on-peer abuse in safeguarding metrics
Incidents of peer-on-peer abuse should be included in adult safeguarding metrics and included on a published safeguarding dashboard.
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R64 |
Safeguarding dashboard with screening decisions
The dashboard should include the number of allegations reported, together with the screening decision (referral to the Adult Safeguarding Gateway, referral to …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R65 |
Common safeguarding investigation standards
There should be common standards for the conduct of safeguarding investigations. These should be drafted and approved by the Northern Ireland Adult …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R66 |
Quarterly safeguarding file audit
A quarterly multidisciplinary audit of 10% of safeguarding files per ward or residential unit should be conducted. Findings must be integrated with …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R67 |
Independent review of systemic abuse conditions
Where there is evidence or suspicion of widespread abuse involving multiple staff and residents, focusing solely on individual perpetrators is insufficient. An …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R68 |
Cumulative risk assessment across protection plans
Protection plans should include an assessment of risks arising from the plan itself. Where multiple protection plans are in place for vulnerable …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R69 |
Needs-based staffing with acuity measures
Staffing should be based on service user needs rather than a fixed budget, using daily acuity measures designed specifically for units caring …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R70 |
Mandatory monthly clinical supervision
Clinical supervision (where individuals’ practice with individual patients is discussed) should be mandatory for all ward staff, including healthcare assistants, and should …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R71 |
Specialist training for healthcare assistants
All healthcare assistants working with people with learning disabilities and autistic people should be provided with training, which should include specialist learning …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R72 |
Review supervision models for commissioned services
SPPG must commission a review of the potential models for supervision of staff in private and third sector services commissioned by HSCTs, …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R73 |
Band 4 associate practitioners
Consideration should be given to enhancing the post of healthcare assistant by creating Band 4 associate practitioners in both hospital and community …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R74 |
Staffing review in safeguarding investigations
Consideration of staffing (including skill mix as well as total numbers) should be a mandatory part of safeguarding investigations in all settings.
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R75 |
Executive Director of Clinical and Social Care Governance
There must be understanding of both individual untoward events but also (and more importantly) systems and trends. Creating and maintaining effective governance …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R76 |
NED with clinical governance expertise
NEDs should be selected for their expertise across a range of skills and at least one should have extensive experience of clinical …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R77 |
Triennial Board governance reviews
The DoH Permanent Secretary should commission triennial reviews of each Board’s collective performance in clinical and social care governance.
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R78 |
Audit committee implementation tracking
HSCT Board audit committees should consider all internal audit recommendations and require directorates to provide updates on implementation three months, six months …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R79 |
Board member learning framework
The DoH should commission the HSC Leadership Centre to develop a learning framework for all Board members. All Trust Board directors should …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R80 |
NED for confidential staff reporting
Consideration should be given to the creation of a role for a NED in each HSCT with the specific remit to receive …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R81 |
Expert clinical governance advisory function
The DoH should establish an expert clinical/social governance advisory function to support providers.
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R82 |
Risk-based inspection prediction
RQIA should consider developing a risk-based way of predicting which services are in difficulty. It is well known that certain aspects of …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R83 |
RQIA use of CCTV in inspections
The RQIA needs to reconsider whether to make use of CCTV when it is in operation in a service it is inspecting …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R84 |
Learning disability service culture measure
RQIA needs to consider adopting a measure of service culture specific to learning disability services for use in its inspections. Such measures …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R85 |
RQIA communication with patients
RQIA needs to spend proportionately more time talking to patients/residents, and its staff need to be trained in specific communication techniques such …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |