CR17 Accepted

Protocol for duty to assist referrals

Cranston Inquiry · The Cranston Inquiry Report · Issued 5 February 2026 · Addressed to: Maritime and Coastguard Agency

Source — verbatim from the inquiry

Inquiry recommendation

HM Coastguard and the Maritime and Coastguard Agency should establish a protocol for referrals by HM Coastguard to the Maritime and Coastguard Agency's regulatory compliance investigations team, identifying the threshold for making a referral on a potential breach by a vessel of the duty to render assistance, the information to be communicated and how the numbers of referrals are to be annually reported.

Cranston Inquiry, The Cranston Inquiry Report · 5 Feb 2026 Source PDF →

Published evidence summary

Publicly available evidence relating to this recommendation:

Government response: Accepted. No public evidence of delivery has been found.

Sources

Government response (2026-07-16): Accepted Source: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/cranston-inquiry-interim-response Text: HMCG accepts the importance of a protocol for making referrals to the Regulatory Compliance and Investigations team (RCIT) and revised its SOPs in October 2023 to enshrine this practice. This update reminded all staff of the legal requirement for a vessel to proceed with all speed to the assistance
How was this evidence gathered?
Evidence searched by baseline-data-v1 on 17 Aug 2026
Checked data held on this site (government responses, progress updates, independent evidence)
External sources searched: www.gov.uk

Response — verbatim from government

Maritime and Coastguard Agency

HMCG accepts the importance of a protocol for making referrals to the Regulatory Compliance and Investigations team (RCIT) and revised its SOPs in October 2023 to enshrine this practice. This update reminded all staff of the legal requirement for a vessel to proceed with all speed to the assistance of the persons in distress (unless the master considers it unreasonable or unnecessary to do so). The SOP states that network commanders must inform RCIT at the earliest opportunity when vessels near to a distress position do not respond to a mayday relay broadcast. Failure to respond is considered during operational reviews by HMCG, with referrals made when the threshold is reached. This takes into consideration vessels that are not required to respond - for example, if it would be unsafe to do so, if they would not be able to assist, or not able to assist in time. HMCG would take action to understand why a nearby vessel that appeared able to support did not respond, and this would result in a referral if no adequate reason were evident. It is rare for vessels not to comply. HMCG will develop a process to maintain awareness of referrals and support data collection.

Maritime and Coastguard Agency · 16 Jul 2026 Written response →

Evidence trail — what's actually happened since

No published activity has been recorded against this recommendation yet.

Each entry above links to a primary source — gov.uk written statement, consultation response document, or inspection report. The Index does not characterise government intent; it tracks what has been published.

How this page is built

Source and Response are verbatim from primary documents. The Evidence trail records published activity since — written statements, consultation outcomes, inspection findings, parliamentary references. The Index does not paraphrase or characterise intent; it tracks what has been published. Where the evidence is the absence of action (a missed deadline, a slipped timetable), that absence is documented from primary sources rather than inferred.

This recommendation's data is verified periodically against primary sources. The Index is monitored for staleness weekly.