Responsibility for requiring and monitoring delivery of enhanced standards
Mid Staffs Inquiry · Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry · Issued 6 February 2013 · Addressed to: Commissioners
Government responseDepartment of Health and Social Care: Accepted (Nov 2013)
DeliveryDHSC and NHS England say in progress (Feb 2026)Department of Health and Social Care says in progress (Feb 2015)
Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry
●Inquiry recommendation
In addition to their duties with regard to the fundamental standards, commissioners should be enabled to promote improvement by requiring compliance with enhanced standards or development towards higher standards. They can incentivise such improvements either financially or by other means designed to enhance the reputation and standing of clinicians and the organisations for which they work.
Mid Staffs Inquiry, Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry · 6 Feb 2013 Source PDF →
Published evidence summary
AI-generated evidence summary
In September 2024, in commentary published in February 2026, the Department of Health and Social Care and NHS England noted that the recommendation remained in progress, referring to their response on a preceding recommendation (DHSC and NHS England, Feb 2026). Earlier, in May 2024, the Thirlwall Inquiry legal team recorded that the government had accepted the recommendation and planned to use contractual indicators and dedicated funding to encourage higher standards (The Thirlwall Inquiry legal team, May 2024). The department had previously reported in February 2015 that quality frameworks and incentive schemes had been established to reward service improvements under provider contracts (Department of Health, Feb 2015).
Sources
AI-generated summary of the record on this page, checked by a second model and automatic checks, 26 Sep 2026.
Report-level response context
Government response
●Department of Health and Social Care · Accepted · 19 Nov 2013
Accepted.
The NHS Standard Contract allows for agreement on a range of quality standards or development towards higher standards. Incentives should thus contribute to improved outcomes through improvement in the quality of health services for patients, their families and carers, and through reducing health inequalities. NHS England will be setting and incentivising enhanced standards through a ‘pick-list’ of evidence based indicators for improvement, against which it and clinical commissioning groups can set improvement trajectories and a number of non-mandated best practice service specifications to use with providers. NHS England will continue to make significant funding available (up to 2% of provider contract value) for commissioners to use in setting local improvement goals.
Delivery
●DHSC and NHS England say in progress · 27 Feb 2026
Please see response to recommendation 124 above.
●Department of Health and Social Care says in progress · 11 Feb 2015
NHS England has set and incentivised enhanced standards for 2014/15 through a ‘pick-list’ of evidence based indicators for improvement. The Commissioning for Quality and Innovation scheme for 2014/15 provides a national framework through which organisations providing healthcare services under the NHS Standard Contract can earn incentive payments of up to 2.5% of their contract value by achieving agreed national and local goals for service quality improvement. NHS England will continue to keep the provisions in the NHS Standard Contract under review.
The quality premium rewards Clinical Commissioning Groups for improvements in the quality of the services that they commission and for associated improvements in health outcomes and reducing inequalities.
The quality premium paid to Clinical Commissioning Groups in 2015/16 – to reflect the quality of the health services commissioned by them in 2014/15 – will be based on six measures that cover a combination of national and local priorities. These are:
• reducing potential years of lives lost through causes considered amenable to healthcare and addressing locally agreed priorities for reducing premature mortality (15 % of quality premium);
• improving access to psychological therapies (15 % of quality premium);
• reducing avoidable emergency admissions (25 % of quality premium);
• addressing issues identified in the 2013/14 Friends and Family Test, supporting roll out of Friends and Family Test in 2014/15 and showing improvement in a locally selected patient experience indicator (15 % of quality premium);
• improving the reporting of medication-related safety incidents based on a locally selected measure (15 % of quality premium);
• a further local measure that should be based on local priorities such as those identified in joint health and wellbeing strategies (15 % of quality premium).
The quality premium will be further developed to confirm the combination of national and local priorities that will determine the amount to be paid to Clinical Commissioning Groups in 2016/17 to reflect the quality of health services commissioned in 2015/16. Details will be published alongside the NHS Standard Contract for 2015/16, and details of other incentives to improve quality.
What other bodies have found
●Thirlwall Inquiry legal team · 15 May 2024
This recommendation was accepted by the Government. In the January 2014 Hard Truths Report, the Government referred to the NHS Standard Contract as allowing for agreement on a range of quality standards or development towards higher standards. The Government also said that NHS England would set and incentivise enhanced standards through evidence-based indicators for improvement, against which it and clinical commissioning groups could set improvement trajectories. NHS England would make funding available to commissioners to use in setting local improvement goals.
How this page is built
The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.