Duty to require and monitor delivery of fundamental standards
Mid Staffs Inquiry · Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry · Issued 6 February 2013 · Addressed to: Commissioners
Government responseDepartment of Health and Social Care: Accepted in part (Nov 2013)
DeliveryDHSC and NHS England say in progress (Feb 2026)Department of Health and Social Care says in progress (Feb 2015)
Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry
●Inquiry recommendation
The commissioner is entitled to and should, wherever it is possible to do so, apply a fundamental safety and quality standard in respect of each item of service it is commissioning. In relation to each such standard, it should agree a method of measuring compliance and redress for non-compliance. Commissioners should consider whether it would incentivise compliance by requiring redress for individual patients who have received sub-standard service to be offered by the provider. These must be consistent with fundamental standards enforceable by the Care Quality Commission.
Mid Staffs Inquiry, Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry · 6 Feb 2013 Source PDF →
Published evidence summary
AI-generated evidence summary
The Department of Health and Social Care and NHS England stated in September 2024 that the NHS Standard Contract for 2024/25 enables commissioners to agree enhanced local quality requirements, though the clawback element of the quality incentive scheme was paused while a wider review of incentives was undertaken (DHSC and NHS England, Feb 2026). In May 2024, the Thirlwall Inquiry legal team noted that the government had accepted the recommendation in principle but decided after consultation not to require individual patient redress (The Thirlwall Inquiry legal team, May 2024).
AI-generated summary of the record on this page, checked by a second model and automatic checks, 26 Sep 2026.
Report-level response context
Government response
●Department of Health and Social Care · Accepted in part · 19 Nov 2013
Accepted in principle.
Fundamental standards of care will be a key part of Care Quality Commission registration requirements and so commissioners will only contract with providers that are meeting these standards.
Commissioners must have regard to any fundamental standard that relates to a service they commission, and they should apply it where they can. They can set safety and quality standards for all services they commission, through clear specification. The NHS Standard Contract allows for agreement at local level of the method of measuring compliance with such standards, and any appropriate sanctions.
We have considered whether commissioners should consider incentivising compliance through redress for individual patients, which has been tested with providers and commissioners, and the overwhelming response was that this would not be practicable. Potential difficulties would be:
• a drain of funds from the local health community, where funds may be most needed;
• the potential for perverse incentives to claim compensation;
• duplication with existing rights for patients to be recompensed through litigation; and
• methodological challenges in assessing the appropriate level of recompense.
Delivery
●DHSC and NHS England say in progress · 27 Feb 2026
The NHS Standard Contract 2024/25 includes a service condition (no. 37) on local quality requirements. This allows for the agreement of enhanced standards as part of the annual contractual agreement between commissioners and providers.
For specialised services, national service specifications additionally set out key quality requirements.
CQUIN
The Commissioning for Quality and Innovation (CQUIN) incentive scheme is intended to support improvements in the quality of services and the creation of new, improved patterns of care. CQUIN centres on set of annually agreed evidence-based improvement indicators, supported by specifications and an element of provider income was conditional on demonstrating related improvements in quality. Providers and commissioners agree a fixed element that assumes full achievement of CQUIN criteria, with funding then paid back by providers if they achieve less than this.
The clawback element of the scheme is currently paused for 2024/25. A wider review of incentives for quality is now being undertaken.
●Department of Health and Social Care says in progress · 11 Feb 2015
Revised provisions, particularly relating to commissioner’s rights to suspend the provision of services, were published in December 2013 as part of the NHS Standard Contract for 2014–15. NHS England will continue to keep the provisions in the NHS Standard Contract under review.
What other bodies have found
●Thirlwall Inquiry legal team · 15 May 2024
This recommendation was accepted in principle by the Government.
In the January 2014 Hard Truths report, the Government said that commissioners would only contract providers that are meeting fundamental standards, and commissioners were to have regard to any fundamental standard that related to a service they commission, with the NHS Standard Contract allowing for agreement at a local level for the method of measuring compliance with such standards and any appropriate sanctions.
The Government said it had considered whether commissioners should incentivise compliance through redress for individual patients, but decided not to after consultation.
How this page is built
The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.