F126

Preserving corporate memory

Mid Staffs Inquiry · Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry · Issued 6 February 2013 · Addressed to: NHS England

Government responseDepartment of Health and Social Care: Accepted (Nov 2013)

DeliveryDHSC and NHS England say in progress (Feb 2026)Department of Health and Social Care states no delivery position (Feb 2015)

Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry

●Inquiry recommendation

The NHS Commissioning Board and local commissioners should develop and oversee a code of practice for managing organisational transitions, to ensure the information conveyed is both candid and comprehensive. This code should cover both transitions between commissioners, for example as new clinical commissioning groups are formed, and guidance for commissioners on what they should expect to see in any organisational transitions amongst their providers.

Mid Staffs Inquiry, Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry · 6 Feb 2013 Source PDF →

Published evidence summary

AI-generated evidence summary

In February 2026, the Department of Health and Social Care and NHS England reported that guidance and due diligence checklists had been used during transitions to integrated care boards to ensure corporate memory was preserved (DHSC and NHS England, Feb 2026).

Sources

AI-generated summary of the record on this page, checked by a second model and automatic checks, 26 Sep 2026.

Report-level response context

Government responded via "Hard Truths: The Journey to Putting Patients First" (2014), a single document covering all 290 recommendations with a blanket acceptance. Individual recommendation responses were not broken out.

Government response

●Department of Health and Social Care · Accepted · 19 Nov 2013

Speaker not recorded. Source: Department of Health, Hard Truths: the Journey to Putting Patients First, volume 2 (Cm 8777-II), November 2013

Accepted.
NHS organisations have gained significant learning from the transition to the reformed NHS system in 2013. NHS England will continue to work with commissioners to build on this, so that information handed over in future transitions is comprehensive and candid.
The handover process from Strategic Health Authorities and Primary Care Trusts to the reformed NHS system was developed with guidance on effective quality handover from the National Quality Board, to address the requirements of managing organisational transitions. This will be used as a template for future transitions.
The key lessons on effective transition identified by the National Quality Board included:
• the need for clarity of purpose with time for the system to understand and meet the requirements of a handover process;
• documenting information is an important discipline, but the most valuable part of the process was the face-to-face conversations between individuals;
• information should not only be handed over in order to reduce risk; the ambition for quality improvement should be handed over, so that services continue to improve for patients;
• documents need to be easy to access and navigate by the recipient, so that it is apparent where the areas of risk are in terms of quality. Too much information is as unhelpful as too little;
• the documents are for the benefit of recipients, and should tell them whatever they need to know in order to help them exercise their new accountabilities. They should not be confused with an attempt to record the achievements of the existing organisation;
• triangulation of data (both hard and soft) did not always happen between all of the relevant bodies, such as the regulators, but when it did it was extremely helpful. We need to be much clearer about the requirements of our key stakeholders;
• it is vital that patient experience data is captured as part of the quality assessment and to find ways of engaging with patient groups as part of the process of triangulation;
• ‘looking and seeing’ should form part of the triangulation process wherever possible;
• while data was generally strong and comprehensive on the acute sector, we need to extend and improve our inclusion of data on the quality of primary, secondary and tertiary care, social care, ambulance services, screening programmes, offender health, mental health and the independent and third sectors;
• the responsibility for the handover should sit equally with both the receiver and the sender. i.e. if there are gaps in the documentation handed over, then it is the duty of the recipient to proactively seek to fill those gaps;
• the requirement to take handover documents to the public sessions of boards helped the process to be taken seriously, and was in line with the proposed new Duty of Candour. On the whole the media treated this information responsibly;
• embedding documents is not good practice, as the information can be lost as links and websites close down. We need to use technology better to ensure that documents are kept ‘live’ and electronically available to those who need it, with better version control;
• some issues transcend individual organisations, and there may be a need for a small number of thematic handovers in order to maintain quality during transition.
NHS England will consider with clinical commissioning groups what further support and guidance might be required.

Response document: Hard Truths: The Journey to Putting Patients First. Volume Two of the Government Response to the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry: Response to the Inquiry's Recommendations

Site note: This is volume two of "Hard Truths: The Journey to Putting Patients First" (Cm 8777-II), the government's response to the Inquiry's 290 recommendations, published by the Department of Health on GOV.UK on 19 November 2013 and dated to that day here. The PDF the row links to is the accessible edition, whose title page reads "January 2014". The Department of Health has been the Department of Health and Social Care since January 2018. The volume says it includes accounts from each of the national organisations the recommendations name, but it does not mark which passage each organisation wrote, so every row is filed under the Department that published it.

Delivery

●DHSC and NHS England say in progress · 27 Feb 2026

NHS England provided guidance and support to Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) on CCG mergers and on the preparations for Integrated Care Board (ICB) establishment and facilitated learning and spread of best practice from previous organisational changes.

Similarly, for ICB establishment, a comprehensive suite of guidance and additional support was provided by NHS England to help CCGs prepare for ICBs to be legally established.

‘Readiness to operate statements’ were signed off jointly by designate ICB CEOs and NHS England Regional Directors in June 2022, to provide assurance of robust arrangements for organisational transition.

The readiness to operate statements were based on a comprehensive ‘ROS’ assessment checklist. The ROS assessment included use of extensive staff and property due diligence checklists, signed off by CCG Accountable Officers. The due diligence checklists were designed to ensure that there was no loss of corporate memory at the point of transition, and that key information, for example, staff records and information on quality, safety, finance and any other risks, was safely transferred to the new ICBs. The quality and safety information assets covered open incidents and complaints and learning from previous incidents and complaints.

For the calendar year prior to transition, there was significant dialogue between NHS England regional teams and ICBs, ensuring that the ROS checklist and due diligence checklists were not treated as a ‘tick box’ exercise, but were completed on the basis of a deep and shared understanding of the necessary elements to ensure safe and effective organisational transitions.

All statutory transactions are reportable, regardless of their size. Once reported, NHS England will consider whether the proposed transaction is the right solution to the issues it is attempting to address and that the intended benefits will be delivered. NHS England will look at the proposal in detail, using a risk framework to determine its risk rating based on four domains: strategy, transaction execution, quality and finance. The Health and Care Act 2022 granted the requirement for the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care to approve all transactions. NHS England will only grant an application for a merger, acquisition, dissolution or separation where they are satisfied that NHS providers have taken the necessary steps to prepare for the transaction, and where the grant is approved by the Secretary of State.

From: The Thirlwall Inquiry: Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version dated April 2025)

Site note: DHSC and NHS England's own account of progress, supplied to the Thirlwall Inquiry in September 2024 and printed in the Inquiry legal team's Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version dated April 2025, published 27 February 2026). It is not a finding of the Inquiry. Their reviewed extent of implementation reads “Implemented - Ongoing”. Table row: section 18.2 No. 126, PDF page 484-485.

●Department of Health and Social Care states no delivery position · 11 Feb 2015

No further update is required. Please see response to the recommendation in Hard Truths

From: Culture Change in the NHS supporting Annex (annex to Culture change in the NHS: applying the lessons of the Francis Inquiries)

Site note: This is the supporting annex published on 11 February 2015 with "Culture change in the NHS: applying the lessons of the Francis Inquiries" (Cm 9009), attached to the GOV.UK page as "Culture change in the NHS supporting annex". The annex has no title page; that title is GOV.UK's and the PDF's own. Its table has four columns (No., Recommendation, Hard Truths Government response, Progress update), and the row carries the Progress update cell. No column says which organisation wrote an update, so the row is filed under the Department of Health (now the Department of Health and Social Care), which published it.

Site note: The Inquiry addressed this recommendation to NHS England, not to the Department of Health. The annex gives this update in the Department's publication and does not say who wrote it, so the row is the Department's report of the progress made on it.

What other bodies have found

In their own words. These do not change the delivery statement above.

●Thirlwall Inquiry legal team · 15 May 2024

This recommendation was accepted by the Government.

In the January 2014 Hard Truths report, the Government said that the handover process from strategic health authorities and primary care trusts to the reformed NHS system was developed with guidance on effective quality handover form the National Quality Board, which would be used as a template for future transitions. The Government said that NHS England to consider what further support and guidance might be required.

No update was given in the February 2015 Culture Change report.

From: The Thirlwall Inquiry: Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version of 15 May 2024)

Site note: The Thirlwall Inquiry legal team's own notes on implementation, from its Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version of 15 May 2024). The review does not colour its Extent of Implementation cell for this recommendation green; it leaves the cell uncoloured where a recommendation was rejected, where evidence of implementation was insufficient, or where steps had been taken but implementation was not yet complete. Table row: section 16.2 No. 126, PDF page 451.

How this page is built

The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.