Maximum Continuous Duty Period for AFOs
Anthony Grainger Inquiry · The Anthony Grainger Inquiry Report into the Death of Anthony Grainger · Issued 11 July 2019 · Addressed to: College of Policing
Government responseHome Office: Accepted (May 2020)
DeliveryHome Office says in progress (May 2020)
Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry
●Inquiry recommendation
The National Police Chiefs' Council (NPCC) and the College of Policing should jointly decide, in the light of independent expert advice, whether there should be a maximum period of time during which authorised firearms officers (AFOs) are permitted to remain on continuous duty and, if so, should ensure that this maximum period is specified in national guidance.
Anthony Grainger Inquiry, The Anthony Grainger Inquiry Report into the Death of Anthony Grainger · 11 Jul 2019 Source PDF →
Published evidence summary
AI-generated evidence summary
The Home Office reported in May 2020 that the National Police Chiefs' Council and the College of Policing intended to seek independent expert advice to review the necessity and practicality of introducing duty time limits for authorised firearms officers before issuing national guidance (Home Office response, May 2020; Home Office, May 2020). The department noted in May 2020 that an interim circular had been issued to forces regarding officer fatigue and fitness monitoring, with the review provisionally targeted for completion by 31 July 2020 (Home Office response, May 2020; Home Office, May 2020). The record holds no update since the department's response of May 2020 (Home Office response, May 2020; Home Office, May 2020).
AI-generated summary of the record on this page, checked by a second model and automatic checks, 26 Sep 2026.
Government response
●Home Office · Accepted · 19 May 2020
37. Following discussions with NPCC and the College of Policing, the Government understands that current guidance does not specify a time limit and that there would be significant operational implications of doing so. There are, however, clearly stated expectations and supporting processes set out below. To meet the requirements of this recommendation, NPCC and the College of Policing intend to seek, and consider, independent expert advice before issuing national guidance. 38. NPCC have informed the Government that in the interim they have recently issued a circular to forces to emphasise that the national position is that at present there is no specified maximum period for which Authorised Firearms Officers (AFOs) are permitted to remain on duty. The circular also reminded forces of the following: a. AFOs are responsible for continuously assessing their own fitness to perform their role. They should notify their supervisor and/or the firearms commander of any doubts as to their fitness to do so. b. Operational, tactical and strategic firearms commanders all have a duty to monitor the fitness of all AFOs under their command to perform their role during any period of continuous duty. Commanders should ensure that appropriate steps are taken to maintain the AFOs' fitness to remain on duty and to ensure that officer's wellbeing is provided for where possible. c. Forces are responsible for ensuring that routine shift patterns and repetitive planned deployments of AFOs are conducted within legal frameworks and should take into account the effects of cumulative fatigue. 39. Next Steps: NPCC will seek independent expert advice to conduct a review of the necessity and practicality of introducing a time limit for the length of duty of authorised firearms officers. NPCC will then issue further national guidance. The provisional target is to complete work by 31 July 2020.
Extract from: Government response to the Anthony Grainger public inquiry (accessible version)
Delivery
●Home Office says in progress · 19 May 2020
38. NPCC have informed the Government that in the interim they have recently issued a circular to forces to emphasise that the national position is that at present there is no specified maximum period for which Authorised Firearms Officers (AFOs) are permitted to remain on duty. The circular also reminded forces of the following:
a. AFOs are responsible for continuously assessing their own fitness to perform their role. They should notify their supervisor and/or the firearms commander of any doubts as to their fitness to do so.
b. Operational, tactical and strategic firearms commanders all have a duty to monitor the fitness of all AFOs under their command to perform their role during any period of continuous duty. Commanders should ensure that appropriate steps are taken to maintain the AFOs’ fitness to remain on duty and to ensure that officer’s wellbeing is provided for where possible.
c. Forces are responsible for ensuring that routine shift patterns and repetitive planned deployments of AFOs are conducted within legal frameworks and should take into account the effects of cumulative fatigue.
39. Next Steps: NPCC will seek independent expert advice to conduct a review of the necessity and practicality of introducing a time limit for the length of duty of authorised firearms officers. NPCC will then issue further national guidance. The provisional target is to complete work by 31 July 2020.
From: Government response to the Anthony Grainger public inquiry (accessible version)
How this page is built
The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.