AG-9 Accepted

Maximum Continuous Duty Period for AFOs

Anthony Grainger Inquiry · The Anthony Grainger Inquiry Report into the Death of Anthony Grainger · Issued 11 July 2019 · Addressed to: College of Policing

Source — verbatim from the inquiry

Inquiry recommendation

The National Police Chiefs' Council (NPCC) and the College of Policing should jointly decide, in the light of independent expert advice, whether there should be a maximum period of time during which authorised firearms officers (AFOs) are permitted to remain on continuous duty and, if so, should ensure that this maximum period is specified in national guidance.

Anthony Grainger Inquiry, The Anthony Grainger Inquiry Report into the Death of Anthony Grainger · 11 Jul 2019 Source PDF →

Response — verbatim from government

College of Policing

37. Following discussions with NPCC and the College of Policing, the Government understands that current guidance does not specify a time limit and that there would be significant operational implications of doing so. There are, however, clearly stated expectations and supporting processes set out below. To meet the requirements of this recommendation, NPCC and the College of Policing intend to seek, and consider, independent expert advice before issuing national guidance. 38. NPCC have informed the Government that in the interim they have recently issued a circular to forces to emphasise that the national position is that at present there is no specified maximum period for which Authorised Firearms Officers (AFOs) are permitted to remain on duty. The circular also reminded forces of the following: a. AFOs are responsible for continuously assessing their own fitness to perform their role. They should notify their supervisor and/or the firearms commander of any doubts as to their fitness to do so. b. Operational, tactical and strategic firearms commanders all have a duty to monitor the fitness of all AFOs under their command to perform their role during any period of continuous duty. Commanders should ensure that appropriate steps are taken to maintain the AFOs' fitness to remain on duty and to ensure that officer's wellbeing is provided for where possible. c. Forces are responsible for ensuring that routine shift patterns and repetitive planned deployments of AFOs are conducted within legal frameworks and should take into account the effects of cumulative fatigue. 39. Next Steps: NPCC will seek independent expert advice to conduct a review of the necessity and practicality of introducing a time limit for the length of duty of authorised firearms officers. NPCC will then issue further national guidance. The provisional target is to complete work by 31 July 2020.

College of Policing · 21 May 2020 Written response →

Evidence trail — what's actually happened since

No published activity has been recorded against this recommendation yet.

Each entry above links to a primary source — gov.uk written statement, consultation response document, or inspection report. The Index does not characterise government intent; it tracks what has been published.

How this page is built

Source and Response are verbatim from primary documents. The Evidence trail records published activity since — written statements, consultation outcomes, inspection findings, parliamentary references. The Index does not paraphrase or characterise intent; it tracks what has been published. Where the evidence is the absence of action (a missed deadline, a slipped timetable), that absence is documented from primary sources rather than inferred.

This recommendation's data is verified periodically against primary sources. The Index is monitored for staleness weekly.