MASTS Vehicle Identification Equipment
Anthony Grainger Inquiry · The Anthony Grainger Inquiry Report into the Death of Anthony Grainger · Issued 11 July 2019 · Addressed to: National Police Chiefs Council
Source — verbatim from the inquiry
●Inquiry recommendation
The National Police Chiefs' Council (NPCC) should consider whether to recommend equipping unmarked vehicles used in Mobile Armed Support to Surveillance (MASTS) interventions with apparatus designed to identify to subjects that those conducting such interventions are police officers - specifically (i) the illumination of previously concealed blue lights on unmarked police vehicles; and/or (ii) integral loudspeaker systems that could be used to broadcast information or instructions outside such a vehicle.
Anthony Grainger Inquiry, The Anthony Grainger Inquiry Report into the Death of Anthony Grainger · 11 Jul 2019 Source PDF →
Response — verbatim from government
●National Police Chiefs Council
33. The NPCC have informed the Government that the National Mobile Armed Support to Surveillance (MASTS) role profile (National Resource Standard) addresses the first part of this recommendation. This requires forces to have three covert vehicles equipped with covert blue lights and two-tones. It is incumbent on all forces conducting MASTS operations to ensure that they meet this requirement. The National Police Firearms Training Curriculum (NPFTC) also provides further guidance on their actual use which all forces are required to understand and apply in the planning and operational phases of all MASTS operations. 34. The NPFTC details the consideration of the use of covertly fitted blue lights and sirens which can be used at the point of an intervention to assist the subjects to identify the vehicle as being part of a police operation. The NPTFC goes on to consider the care that needs to be taken so that the timing of the use of blue lights and sirens does not prematurely alert the subject to the covert operation and imminent arrest. The need to ensure that the use of sirens does not make it harder for the subject to hear verbal warnings issued by officers should also be considered. 35. The NPFTC also addresses the second part of Recommendation 8, on the consideration of the use of vehicle public address systems to provide appropriate verbal warnings. 36. Whilst vehicle public address systems do not form part of the National Resource Standard for MASTS vehicles, Recommendation 8 places a specific obligation on forces to consider fitting them and to consider their use in MASTS operations. NPCC do not intend to mandate vehicle public address systems. However, guidance states that forces should assess the tactical and logistical implications of fitting such systems to covert vehicles intended for use in MASTS deployments. A national circular reinforcing this guidance has been published in late 2019 by National Armed Policing secretariat.
National Police Chiefs Council · 21 May 2020 Written response →
Evidence trail — what's actually happened since
No published activity has been recorded against this recommendation yet.
Each entry above links to a primary source — gov.uk written statement, consultation response document, or inspection report. The Index does not characterise government intent; it tracks what has been published.
How this page is built
Source and Response are verbatim from primary documents. The Evidence trail records published activity since — written statements, consultation outcomes, inspection findings, parliamentary references. The Index does not paraphrase or characterise intent; it tracks what has been published. Where the evidence is the absence of action (a missed deadline, a slipped timetable), that absence is documented from primary sources rather than inferred.
This recommendation's data is verified periodically against primary sources. The Index is monitored for staleness weekly.