RHI-33

HMT Communication Protocol

RHI Inquiry · The Report of the Independent Public Inquiry into the Non-Domestic Renewable Heat Incentive (RHI) Scheme · Issued 13 March 2020 · Addressed to: Department of Finance

Government responseNorthern Ireland Executive: Accepted (Oct 2021)

DeliveryDepartment of Finance states no delivery position (Sep 2024)

Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry

●Inquiry recommendation

The protocol for relations with HMT, namely that the Northern Ireland Department of Finance must be the sole conduit of formal communication, should be reinforced and widely understood across the Northern Ireland Civil Service. The Department of Finance, for its part, must recognise that its unique relationship with HMT places on its officials a responsibility to be alert to, and act expeditiously upon, the requirements of all other Departments in matters relating to HMT; and to communicate clearly and effectively with those Departments as to HMT's position in respect of the spending Department's financial envelope.

RHI Inquiry, The Report of the Independent Public Inquiry into the Non-Domestic Renewable Heat Incentive (RHI) Scheme · 13 Mar 2020 Source PDF →

Published evidence summary

AI-generated evidence summary

In September 2024, the Minister of Finance, Caoimhe Archibald, stated that it was a longstanding convention and inquiry recommendation for the Department of Finance to act as the sole conduit of formal communication with HM Treasury (Caoimhe Archibald, Sep 2024). The Northern Ireland Audit Office found in October 2024 that the recommendation had been implemented, reporting that the department confirmed the communication arrangements remained in place with no further developments (Northern Ireland Audit Office, Oct 2024).

AI-generated summary of the record on this page, checked by a second model and automatic checks, 26 Sep 2026.

Government response

●Northern Ireland Executive · Accepted · 7 Oct 2021

Words of: Northern Ireland Executive, Executive Response to the RHI Inquiry Report Recommendations and Action Plan, Annex A, 7 October 2021

These recommendations can be accepted in full.

It is important to note that public expenditure in NI is governed by the UK Budgeting rules set by HM Treasury. These rules mean that there is limited flexibility available to the Executive in some areas.

Some elements are addressed in existing guidance, including the stipulation that resources should be utilised in line with regularity, propriety and value for money considerations. Funding for some specific issues may be provided by HMT on a time-limited basis. In addition the HMT public expenditure rules mean that only very limited funding can be carried forward between financial years. However, this does not override the value for money requirement. Departments have the opportunity to revise annual budget allocations through the in-year process.

Value for Money is already a requirement in the NICS core competency framework.

These recommendations have been addressed in work to date through:
• Departments’ response to the lessons learned following PWC’s Heat Reports;
• the major and fundamental Review of the Expenditure Approval and Business Case Processes, incorporating many of the recommended elements;
• the delivery of an online package of Public Expenditure training for both budget holders and general-service grades;
• the initiation of a review of MPMNI;
• re-establishment of DoF-led Finance Director meetings
• the issue of a formal protocol for engagement with HMT.

Further work is required to:
• give consideration to the role of Casework Committees to ensure that they are rigorous and deliver the necessary scrutiny and independence, in line with the existing role of GatewayTM reviews;
• Implementation of Five Case Model guidance
• Engagement with the Treasury around ‘false economies’
• Consideration by DoF of the introduction of an Approval Panel for the highest cost and most complex proposals
• As part of the Annual Assurance Statement, departments will be asked to confirm:
- that the appropriate approvals process has been followed for all expenditure;
- that Ministers have been made aware of conditions that apply to all expenditure approvals as standard and specifically have been made aware of any non-standard conditions that had been applied to expenditure; and
- that they are content all expenditure activity has adhered to the conditions of its approval.
• Supply shall:
- include a line in non-standard approval letters to say that Ministers should be made aware of the additional conditions; and
- issue a Finance Directors letter to advise this change is coming in and that it would be for departments to determine the most suitable method for advising their Minister of such conditions.
• Progress and finalise the review of MPMNI
• deliver the strategy currently under development for the NICS finance profession;
• Gauge the demand for a further classroom-based training course. As part of that process DoF will engage with Finance Directors on departmental requirements. Should there be demand for such a course DoF will develop in conjunction with CAL.;
• keep the information sharing and knowledge transfer protocols under review, engaging with HMT and departments on their effectiveness and revising where necessary.
• assess position with both HMT and departments and review any breaches for lessons learned as part of its first review.

Response document: Executive Response to the RHI Inquiry Report Recommendations and Action Plan: Annex A Summary of Recommendations and Response

Site note: These are the Northern Ireland Executive's words from Annex A, "Summary of Recommendations and Response", published on this page with the Executive Response to the RHI Inquiry Report Recommendations and Action Plan on 7 October 2021, the day the Executive agreed it. The Department of Finance publishes the response, but it is the Executive's, so the site records it under the Executive. The annex is a PDF that the publisher asks automated readers not to fetch, so the site cites the page that links it.

Site note: Annex A gives this passage once, for the recommendations under its heading "GOVERNANCE AND FINANCIAL CONTROLS": recommendations 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 29, 30, 31, 32a and 33. It is the Executive's response to the group, not to this recommendation alone.

Delivery

●Department of Finance states no delivery position · 17 Sep 2024

It is important that the Executive speaks with one voice and that approaches are led by the Department of Finance (DoF). It is a long standing convention and was also a recommendation of the RHI Inquiry, that DoF should be the sole conduit of formal communication with the Treasury.

From: AQO 792/22-27 (Northern Ireland Assembly question: a wider spectrum of voices on Northern Ireland's financial needs), Caoimhe Archibald, Minister of Finance (Northern Ireland)

Site note: The Minister calls the Department of Finance's role as sole conduit to the Treasury "a recommendation of the RHI Inquiry", which is the subject of this recommendation; she does not give its number.

What other bodies have found

In their own words. These do not change the delivery statement above.

●NI Audit Office · 15 Oct 2024

Implemented.

In respect of previous actions undertaken which resulted in an NIAO assessment of Implemented by 2022, DoF has now confirmed that, in 2024:

these arrangements remain in place and are still operating as described; and

there are no further developments to note in the area.

From: Northern Ireland Non-Domestic RHI Scheme: Progressing implementation of the Public Inquiry recommendations - 2nd Report (Appendix 4)

Site note: This is the Northern Ireland Audit Office's assessment, from Appendix 4 of its second report on the Inquiry's recommendations (15 October 2024), the column "2024 NIAO Assessment". The Audit Office monitors implementation at the Inquiry's request; its assessment is shown beside the Executive's own account and does not set the recommendation's status.

How this page is built

The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.