Source · Prevention of Future Deaths

Tung Tran

Ref: 2026-0359 Date: 9 Jul 2026 Coroner: Richard Brittain Area: Inner North London 3 responses identified · 3 indexed addressees View PDF

Response deadline: 12 November 2026 (estimated from the Judiciary.uk publication date).

Date 9 Jul 2026
56-day deadline 12 Nov 2026 est. estimated from the Judiciary.uk publication date
Responses identified 3 of 3

Coroner's concerns

Coroner’s Concerns (source excerpt)
1. There is a lack of national guidance regarding which services should be responsible for the monitoring and prescribing in relation to hepatitis B reactivation prevention; (concern directed to BASL) 2. There is a large population of patients who are found to have hepatitis B infection through opt-out screening in Emergency Departments but there is...
View full coroner's concerns
1.  There is a lack of national guidance regarding which services  should be responsible for the monitoring and prescribing in relation  to hepatitis B reactivation prevention; (concern directed to BASL) 
2.  There is a large population of patients who are found to have hepatitis B infection through opt-out screening in Emergency Departments  but there is a lack of specialised commissioning to maintain  subsequent engagement with services. I heard that this differs from  the position with regards to hepatitis C and HIV services, even  though these patient populations are smaller (concern directed to UKHSA and  subsequently NHE England after initial input from UKHSA)

Responses

3 respondents

NHS England

NHS / Health Body
PDF
AI-classified response stance Action Taken
AI-generated response summary

NHS England will develop and publish a national circular, engage Operational Delivery Networks, and integrate the hepatitis B reactivation prevention pathway into the Viral Hepatitis Patient Management System. It has also initiated multi-agency working groups, is engaging local commissioners, and supports professionals through a commissioned accredited training programme and an expanded GP Champion Programme.

View full response
Dear Mr Brittain Re: Prevention of Future Deaths Report Thank you for your regulation 28 letter dated 11th May 2026 regarding the evidence and findings relating to the death of Mr Tran. In light of the issues you raise it is important to start by setting out NHS England’s Specialised Commissioning Responsibilities regarding hepatology services. These services, and other secondary care clinical services, are commissioned locally by Integrated Care Boards, with NHS England responsible for setting national standards and clinical policy. Viral Hepatitis Elimination is a national programme led by NHS England’s Specialised Commissioning Team. This team delivers and oversees work contributing to the ambition of eliminating the disease as a public health issue (as a part of the World Health Programme) by 2030. In relation to your queries following the death of Mr Tran:
1. There is a lack of national guidance regarding which services should be responsible for monitoring and prescribing in relation to hepatitis B reactivation prevention (directed to the British Viral Hepatitis Group – BVHG – a part of the British Association for Study of the Liver – BASL) As BASL / BVHG colleagues will have noted, there is a wide range of services which might prescribe antiviral medication to prevent reactivation of hepatitis B (including, but not limited to, haematology, rheumatology, renal, gastroenterology, oncology and non-liver transplant services). Specialist societies (and some NHS Trusts) include guidance on the need for antiviral therapy, though this is not consistent.

[Page 2] Patients diagnosed with chronic hepatitis B will be engaged with local hepatology services, who can oversee any prescribing. A second group, who test negative for virus antigen but still have measurable antibodies would not usually be engaged with hepatology services – instead receiving antiviral for the prevention of virus reactivation by their other specialist team. Action: In addition to supporting the workforce intervention by BASL / BVHG, NHS England will:
i. Develop and publish a NHS Circular to relevant regional and local commissioners highlighting the issue of antiviral prescribing for the prevention of reactivation of hepatitis B. This will be for their onward communication to NHS Trust providers, recommending that advice and guidance is sought from Hepatology teams in each NHS Trust in relation to prevention of reactivation.
ii. Write to our nationally commissioned Viral Hepatitis Operational Delivery Networks (ODNs), and further engage them during their national Network Meeting in November, to ensure that they proactively follow this issue up within all NHS Trusts in England and report back to the Viral Hepatitis national team on progress and engagement with other specialties.
iii. We will include this pathway on the Viral Hepatitis Patient Management System (currently in development, as an expansion to the existing Hepatitis C Patient Registry). Through this we should have full sight of preventative prescribing commencing and ending.
2. There is a large population of patients who are found to have hepatitis B infection through opt- out screening in Emergency Departments but there is a lack of Specialised Commissioning to maintain subsequent engagement with services. I have heard that this differs from the position with regards to hepatitis C and HIV services, even though these patient populations are smaller (concern directed to UKHSA and subsequently NHS England after initial input from UKHSA) HIV and hepatitis C have both been subject to national action plans for several years. HIV has a UK Government supported ‘National HIV Action Plan’, and in 2016 the UK Government made a commitment to the elimination of hepatitis C as a public health issue when new curative medicines became available, and the NHS entered into a strategic procurement of these medicines with the pharmaceutical industry. Hepatitis B has never had this level of focus, remaining a part of local commissioning for hepatology provision, until NHS England prioritised hepatitis B for additional national improvement and oversight in 2025. Since that time, we have worked with other Government Departments, stakeholders and patient groups across England to define the necessary steps to improve England’s response to hepatitis B diagnosis, treatment and surveillance. There is further work to be done, but the current activity includes: © NHS England 2026 2

[Page 3]
i. Time Limited Working Groups (multi agency, with clinical and ‘lived experience’ membership) covering patient-led system navigation support, vaccination, Primary Care and medicines – with linkage to the Secondary / specialist care consensus work (London, but with applicability to England)
ii. Engagement with local commissioners through NHS England structures, re- emphasizing the respective commissioning and delivery responsibilities of nationally retained services and locally delegated services.
iii. Meeting with clinical networks is imminent, in the geographies most affected by the increase in need following the implementation of ED BBV opt out testing (derived from UKHSA data relating to rates of positive tests and through direct feedback from Clinicians). The ‘Top 7’ Viral Hepatitis Networks (which, with further data analysis and consultation, may become 10) will work with the national NHS England Viral Hep Elimination Programme to develop immediate system ‘fixes’, funded through dedicated business cases, whilst further work is carried out with local (ICB) commissioners.
iv. National Viral Hep Network Meeting – planned for November 2026 – will have dedicated sessions on defining and quantifying the issues relating to increased HBV diagnosis, sharing of good practice, and discussing further potential for targeted interventions.
v. Other clinical professionals are being supported to provide increased and improved care in relation to HBV, through a commissioned accredited training programme and an expansion of our GP Champion Programme. We are committed to achieving expanded and improved care for people living with hepatitis B and are particularly cognisant of the multiple health inclusion needs of this population. Please do revert back to us should you have any further questions regarding this response.

British Association for the study of the Liver

PDF
AI-classified response stance Action Planned
AI-generated response summary

BASL clarified that its role does not include developing national clinical guidelines. However, it plans to incorporate hepatitis B reactivation risks and prevention into its upcoming webinar and conference programmes, and will continue to highlight health inequalities and access to care.

View full response
Dear Mr Brittain, Re: Prevention of Future Deaths Report The British Viral Hepatitis Group (BVHG) is a sub-group of the British Association for the Study of the Liver (BASL). BASL is a charitable specialist society dedicated to advancing knowledge and understanding of liver diseases and to the optimal care of patients with those diseases. These aims are principally achieved through dissemination of research and sharing of clinical expertise and through the promotion of opportunities for collaboration in liver research. BASL does not lead the development or publication of clinical guidelines. There are two groups of patients requiring antiviral therapy when undergoing immunosuppressive treatment:
• The first is those patients with a diagnosis of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) defined by the presence of a positive hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) on two occasions 6 months apart. These CHB patients are usually managed in specialist hepatology services and the responsibility of monitoring and prescribing lies with these services.
• The second group is those patients who are HBsAg negative but hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb) positive. These patients are at risk of hepatitis B reactivation in the setting of immunosuppressive treatment. There are many different specialties who prescribe immunosuppressive regimens, including (but not limited to) haematology, oncology, and non-liver organ transplant services. Guidance regarding the need for antiviral therapy for such patients is provided by the relevant specialist societies and frequently also in local NHS Trust guidance. There is variation between NHS Trusts as to whether this monitoring and prescribing is delivered by the treating team or whether specialist hepatology services are involved. Limited Company No: 5017662. Registered Charity No: 1106320

[Page 2] The British Association for the Study of the Liver (BASL) Secretariat Office c/o Executive Business Support Ltd Stowe House, St Chad’s Road, Lichfield, Staffordshire WS13 6TJ
• In line with the educational role of BASL and BVHG we have previously and will again incorporate the risks of hepatitis B reactivation and its prevention and management into our webinar and conference programmes in this coming year. We will use this forum to highlight the risks of gaps in monitoring and prescribing of antiviral treatment for participants to take back to their local services. Additionally, we will continue to highlight the role of health inequalities and access to care that also appears to have impacted the outcome in this case as we recognise these as being major issues for people living with viral hepatitis infections more widely.

UK Health Security Agency

Other
PDF
AI-classified response stance Existing Practice
AI-generated response summary

The UKHSA stated it is not responsible for commissioning NHS treatment and care programmes and therefore cannot address the concerns, advising the PFD report be redirected to NHS England specialised commissioning.

View full response
Dear Richard Brittain, Re: Report to Prevent Future Deaths (PFD) We have reviewed the PFD report that was shared with the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) on 11 May 2026. UKHSA are not responsible for the commissioning of NHS treatment and care programmes and therefore, cannot comment on the actions that can be taken to address the concerns in the report. The PFD should be redirected to NHS England specialised commissioning.

Report sections

Investigation and inquest
On 2/10/25, an investigation was commenced into the death of Tung Thanh Tran, aged 41 years. I heard the subsequent inquest on 13/3/26. 

The medical cause of death was determined to be: 
1.a. Acute liver failure 
1.b. Sepsis (unknown source) 
1.c. Hepatitis B reactivation owing to cessation of medication 2.  Immunosuppression for renal transplantation  Mr Tran died at Royal Free Hospital, London on 12/9/25

Inquest Conclusion  Mr Tran died of complications arising from reactivation of a viral illness, which arose from inadvertent discontinuation of necessary medical treatment.
Circumstances of the death
Mr Tran had a background history of renal transplant in 2013 and was  diagnosed with chronic hepatitis B as part of this process. After a period of  disengagement from services, Mr Tran was discharged from hepatology but  continued to receive viral reactivation prophylaxis (Entecavir) from renal  transplant services. 

Supply of medication changed to home delivery in early 2025 but the Entecavir was inadvertently discontinued, as there was a presumption that hepatology  would continue to prescribe this. Mr Tran appears to have understood this to  have been an intentional change of his medication. 

He attended his local hospital in August 2025 with signs of acute liver disease  from reactivation of hepatitis B and was transferred to the Royal Free Hospital. He was too unwell to be considered for liver transplant and sadly died on 12  September 2025.
Action should be taken
In my opinion unless action is taken to address the above concerns then there is a significant risk of future deaths and I believe each of you have the power  to take such action.
Copies sent to
I can confirm I have sent the report to2. The Royal Free Hospital

Similar PFD reports

Shared signals

Report details

Reference
2026-0359
Date of report
9 July 2026
Coroner
Richard Brittain
Coroner area
Inner North London

Responses identified

Responses identified 3 of 3
All listed responses identified

Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 12 Nov 2026 (estimated from the Judiciary.uk publication date).

Sent to

British Association for the study of the Liver
NHS England
UK Health Security Agency

Part of a series

2 reports
2026-0259 1/2

Source links