Source · Prevention of Future Deaths

David Clairmonte

Ref: 2026-0354 Date: 26 Jun 2026 Coroner: Edward Steele Area: East Riding and Hull 3 responses identified · 4 indexed addressees View PDF

Response deadline: 21 August 2026 (stated in the report).

Date 26 Jun 2026
56-day deadline 21 Aug 2026 stated in the report
Responses identified 3 of 4

Coroner's concerns

Coroner’s Concerns (source excerpt)
(1) Evidence was heard in relation to the efforts undertaken by Stockton Hall Psychiatric Unit to find a suitable replacement offering for Mr Clairmonte, who had a personality disorder, within an appropriate high-security setting that could provide specialist care. As a function of there not being an available placement in a personality disorder unit, Mr...
View full coroner's concerns
(1)  Evidence was heard in relation to the efforts undertaken by Stockton Hall Psychiatric Unit to find a suitable replacement offering for Mr Clairmonte, who had a personality disorder, within an appropriate high-security setting that could provide specialist care. As a function of there not being an available placement in a personality disorder unit, Mr Clairmonte was instead placed at HMP Full Sutton. The evidence was that there is a diminishing number of placements in appropriate settings for patients who require specialist care concerning personality disorders. Mr Clairmonte had been at Stockton Hall Psychiatric Unit from 30 November 2017 until he was transferred into the population at HMP Full Sutton on 9 October 2023.

Responses

3 respondents

Department of Health and Social Care

Central Government
PDF
AI-classified response stance Noted
AI-generated response summary

The Department of Health and Social Care has determined that the concerns regarding the availability of high-secure placements for individuals with personality disorders are more appropriately addressed by NHS England, which will provide a full response.

View full response
Dear Mr Steele, Thank you for the Regulation 28 report of 26 June 2026 about the death of David Charles Spencer Clairmonte. I am replying as the Minister with responsibility for system commissioning and provider oversight, including health and justice. Firstly, I would like to say how saddened I was to read of the circumstances of Mr Clairmonte’s death, and I offer my sincere condolences to his family and loved ones. The circumstances your report describes are concerning and I am grateful to you for bringing these matters to my attention. The report raises concerns about the availability of high-secure placements for those with personality disorders who require specialist care. In considering your report, officials within the Department of Health and Social Care have made enquiries with NHS England and concluded that these concerns are more appropriately addressed by NHS England directly. I am advised that NHS England will therefore provide you with a full and comprehensive response on the concerns you have raised. I hope this response is helpful.

NHS England

NHS / Health Body
PDF
AI-classified response stance Disputed
AI-generated response summary

NHS England disputes the coroner's concern about a shortage of high-security placements for personality disorder patients, stating Mr. Clairmonte's remission to prison was on clinical grounds, not due to lack of beds. They explain existing processes for patient remission and for reviewing PFD reports.

View full response
Dear Mr Steele, Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths – David Charles Spencer Clairmonte who died on 4th October 2024. Thank you for your Report to Prevent Future Deaths (hereafter “Report”) dated 26th June 2026 concerning the death of David Charles Spencer Clairmonte on 4th October
2024. In advance of responding to the specific concerns raised in your Report, I would like to express my deep condolences to Mr Clairmonte’s family and loved ones. NHS England is keen to assure the family and yourself that the concerns raised about Mr Clairmonte’s care have been listened to and reflected upon. Your Report raises concern that there is a shortage of adequate placements for patients who require specialist care for personality disorders within a high-security setting. Any patient who is remitted back to prison will have been reviewed by the hospital Multi Disciplinary Team against the statutory basis for remission back to prison, which includes:
• They no longer require treatment in hospital for a mental disorder
• No effective treatment for the disorder can be given in hospital Following submission of the remission request by the Responsible Clinician, it is then reviewed against the remission criteria by the mental health case work section, including the recommended receiving prison. If the criteria are achieved, then a warrant to support the remission back to the identified prison will be issued. In Mr Clairmonte’s case, we have been advised by our regional colleagues that the East of England Secure Services Collaborative discussed his case several times during the year. Attempts were made to identify alternative medium secure personality disorder units due to his enduring mixed personality disorder. However, no unit accepted him. He was discussed with a high secure hospital but not deemed suitable. The clinical leads reviewing his case advised that as he had another 20 years on his sentence and had been in the personality disorder service for over 5 years without substantial engagement in psychological programmes, a remission to prison was

[Page 2] justified. They did highlight that enhanced observations may be the only option to maintain his safety. Therefore, Mr Clairmonte’s remission to prison was completed on clinical grounds, and not due to a lack of mental health beds to treat his personality disorder. It is also of note that the remission to prison took place on 9th October 2023, and he then passed away on 4th October 2024, and that at any time between remission and his death it would have been possible for him to be referred for transfer back to hospital should his mental health presentation have indicated that this was required. NHS England is not aware of any shortage of placements for patients who require specialist care for personality disorders within a high-security setting. I would also like to provide further assurances on the national NHS England work taking place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are discussed by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical Directors, and other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This ensures that key learnings and insights around events, such as the sad death of Mr Clairmonte, are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level and helps us to pay close attention to any emerging trends that may require further review and action. Thank you for bringing these important patient safety issues to my attention and please do not hesitate to contact me should you need any further information.

Ministry of Justice

Central Government
PDF
AI-classified response stance Existing Practice
AI-generated response summary

The Ministry of Justice explains the existing Joint NHS and HMPPS Offender Personality Disorder (OPD) Pathway, which includes 20 Psychologically Informed Planned Environments (PIPEs) in prisons and 13 in the community. It states that HMPPS will continue to engage with NHS England regarding the availability, development, and co-commissioning of specialist pathways.

View full response
Dear Mr Steele, REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS: MR DAVID CLAIRMONTE Thank you for your Regulation 28 report dated 26 June 2026, addressed to the Ministry of Justice (MoJ), NHS England, Department for Health and Social Care and Care Quality Commission following the inquest into the death of David Clairmonte at HMP Full Sutton on 4 October 2024. I am responding to the concerns raised in relation to the MoJ as the Interim Director General of Operations for HM Prisons and Probation service (HMPPS). I understand that you will share this response with Mr Clairmonte’s family. I would like to begin by expressing my sincere condolences for their loss. Every death in custody is a tragedy, and ensuring the safety of those in our care remains our highest priority. Your report draws attention to the increasing demand for specialist personality disorder placements and the importance of ensuring sufficient capacity within appropriate care settings to meet patients' complex needs. HMPPS recognises the importance of ensuring that individuals with complex personality disorders receive care in the most appropriate setting, consistent with public protection requirements and clinical need. While decisions regarding the commissioning and provision of secure mental health services are the responsibility of NHS England; HMPPS works closely with healthcare partners to support effective management of prisoners with complex mental health needs.

[Page 2] You heard evidence at the inquest regarding specialist units referred to as Psychologically Informed Planned Environments (PIPEs). Placements into these units are offered as part of the Joint NHS and HMPPS Offender Personality Disorder (OPD) Pathway. The OPD Pathway is funded and operated jointly by HMPPS and NHS England. It identifies the additional support and treatment needs of over 60,000 high-risk, highly complex offenders likely to meet the medical threshold of having ‘personality disorder’. The pathway routinely sees around 50% of screened in cases assessed as needing, and receiving, additional support. This is complemented by provision of around 4,000 specialist intervention places that are co- commissioned and operated in partnership with the NHS. The OPD Pathway includes provision of 20 PIPE units in prison settings and 13 PIPEs in community Approved Premises. PIPEs are specifically designed environments where staff members have additional training to develop an increased psychological understanding of their work. PIPE services are supported by additional staff and a qualified psychological therapist and focus on providing pro-social relationships and interactions and form part of a treatment pathway of services. They are designed to support offenders at key stages in their sentence, with individual units focussing on either preparation for treatment interventions, stabilisation, progression and consolidation, or transition into the community. HMPPS will continue to engage with NHS England regarding the availability, development, and co-commissioning of specialist pathways for offenders with complex personality related difficulties and high levels of clinical need. Thank you again for bringing these important matters to my attention. I hope this response provides assurance that appropriate action is being taken to address the issues raised.

Report sections

Investigation and inquest
On 25 October 2024, I commenced an investigation into the death of David Charles Spencer Clairmonte (“Mr Clairmonte”), aged 39 years.  The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 18 June 2026. The conclusion of the inquest was a Narrative.

The Narrative conclusion read: Mr Clairmonte was treated for a natural disease, but resentful of the disfigurement and limitations on his life that the stoma presented.  It was recognised that Mr Clairmonte had a complex personality disorder, resulting in increased impulsivity which may have exacerbated the frequence of self-harm related to the stoma upon which he had become fixated. Over time, these repeated serious episodes of self-harm caused irreversible and irreparable damage. This led to a serious degeneration in his health and a depletion of his physiological reserves, due to the complexities of his nutritional status and damage to his bowel from self-harm incidents, leading to his death.

Box 3 of the Record of Inquest read: David Charles Spencer Clairmonte died on 4 October 2024 at 13:38 at York District Hospital following admission for repeated episodes of self-harm. The prognosis was poor due to internal damage caused by self-harm. Mr Clairmonte was deemed to have capacity throughout the admission and, despite the best efforts of treating physicians, he refused treatment, continued to deteriorate and ultimately died. There was no third-party involvement in his death.  Whilst the supervision of Mr Clairmonte at Stockton Hall could have been considered adequate in the short-term, it did not meet Mr Clairmonte’s long-term complex needs. There were missed opportunities in not using NICE guidelines within the transition process from Stockton Hall to HMP Full Sutton. This may have resulted in a less than satisfactory transfer for Mr Clairmonte. The contradictory evidence given regarding efforts to find suitable placements for Mr Clairmonte on leaving Stockton Hall raises questions as to the efficacy for a search for a suitable placement for Mr Clairmonte. These failings did not probably contribute to the death, but they may have done so.

His medical cause of death was recorded as: 1a  Intra-abdominal sepsis, acute haemorrhagic pancreatitis and hypokalemia. 1b  Chronic enterocutaneous fistula, intra-abdominal scarring and chronic dehiscence of a laparotomy scar. 1c  Repeated episodes of intra-abdominal self-harm following surgery for Chron’s Disease.
Circumstances of the death
Mr Clairmonte was transferred from Stockton Hall Psychiatric Hospital, after having been there for nearly six years, to HMP Full Sutton on 9 October 2023.

He had been treated for various self-harm incidents involving his stoma. In his final year, Mr Clairmonte was a patient at hospitals in relation to his physical health issues, including a period of months at St James’s Hospital, Leeds from 1 April 2024.

Mr Clairmonte’s final attendance at hospital was from 27 September 2024 until his date of death, 4 October 2024, at York District Hospital. Mr Clairmonte was admitted due to being very unwell and at the point of a cardiac arrest, due to the losses from his bowel that put heart under compromise.

Mr Clairmonte died in hospital.

Similar PFD reports

Shared signals

Report details

Reference
2026-0354
Date of report
26 June 2026
Coroner
Edward Steele
Coroner area
East Riding and Hull

Responses identified

Responses identified 3 of 4
1 response not yet linked

Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 21 Aug 2026 (stated in the report).

Sent to

Care Quality Commission
Department of Health and Social Care
Ministry of Justice
NHS England

Part of a series

3 reports
2026-0355 1/2
2026-0356 All responses identified

Source links