Source · Prevention of Future Deaths

Garth Pretorius

Ref: 2026-0273 Date: 8 May 2026 Coroner: Paul Marks Area: City of Kingston upon Hull and East Riding of Yorkshire Responses identified: 1 / 2 View PDF

The Emergency Department uses two different triage systems simultaneously, and there are insufficient resources to universally adopt and train staff on the validated Manchester system.

Date 8 May 2026
56-day deadline 3 Jul 2026
Responses identified 1 of 2

Coroner's concerns

AI summary
The Emergency Department uses two different triage systems simultaneously, and there are insufficient resources to universally adopt and train staff on the validated Manchester system.
View full coroner's concerns
Evidence was heard from the Court’s independent expert that it is unacceptable for two different triage systems to be employed simultaneously in the Emergency Department of Hull Royal Infirmary. Professor Fletcher gave evidence that the Manchester system is validated and internationally accepted, but at material times, another system was used and continues to be used. Some practitioners use the Manchester system whilst others use a different system. Evidence was heard that the use of the Manchester system requires training and there do not appear to be sufficient resources still available for it to be adopted universally at Hull Royal Infirmary.

Responses

1 respondent
Humber Health Partnership
10 Jul 2026 PDF
Action Taken

Humber Health Partnership is actively implementing an expanded training and assessment programme for the Manchester Triage System, with 42% of staff already trained. They have also positioned senior clinical decision-makers at the ED front door from 08:00-00:00 for early assessment. (AI summary)

View full response
Dear Professor Marks, Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths – Garth Pretorious We write in response to your Regulation 28 Report dated 8 May 2026. Firstly, we would like to express our sincere condolences to Mr Pretorius’s family for their loss. We recognise the importance of responding fully to the concerns raised. We note the Coroner’s concern that two different triage approaches are being used within the Emergency Department at Hull Royal Infirmary, and the associated risk to patient safety if there is inconsistency in the application of triage processes. The Trust acknowledges the importance of a consistent, reliable and evidence-based approach to triage. In response, we confirm the following: Implementation of the Manchester Triage System The Trust is strengthening the consistent application of the Manchester Triage System through an expanded programme of training and assessment. Clinical Nurse Educators are actively delivering this programme to ensure that all staff undertaking triage are appropriately trained and competent in the use of the system. Progress is being made to ensure improved consistency and reliability in triage decision-making. Training in the Manchester Triage System is being delivered to 155 members of staff through a comprehensive three-stage programme comprising e-learning, a face-to-face workshop, and

a final competency sign-off. This robust training pathway has been designed to ensure staff develop and demonstrate the knowledge and skills required to undertake triage safely and effectively. Currently, 42% of the workforce has completed the training programme in some capacity. Given the size of the workforce and the requirement to maintain operational service provision, achieving full compliance represents a considerable organisational challenge. Nevertheless, a phased implementation plan is in place, and the organisation remains on track to have all staff trained and signed off as competent by the end of the year. Role of Senior Clinical Assessment Where operationally feasible, the Trust positions senior clinical decision-makers at the front door of the Emergency Department between 08:00 and 00:00. These clinicians (Emergency Medicine Consultants or Higher Specialty Trainees) provide early senior assessment, which is known to improve safety, patient flow and clinical decision- making. In these circumstances, triage categorisation may be undertaken through immediate senior clinical assessment rather than formal application of the Manchester Triage System. This approach reflects the principle that the Manchester Triage System is intended to support, rather than replace, senior clinical judgement and experience. Ensuring Safe and Consistent Practice The Trust recognises that variation in practice must be minimised. The expanded training programme and focus on competency assessment are intended to ensure that all staff understand the appropriate use of the Manchester system alongside clinical judgement. This work is ongoing and forms a key part of improving the consistency, safety and reliability of triage processes within the Emergency Department. The Trust has taken, and continues to take, substantive action to ensure the universal, reliable application of the Manchester Triage System, supported by training, governance and audit. In parallel, we are addressing wider systemic factors identified through detailed investigation, including emergency department flow, communication, recognition of deterioration, and the timely management of sepsis.

We are committed to ensuring that these actions are embedded, monitored and sustained, and that the learning from Mr Pretorius’s death leads to meaningful improvements in the safety and quality of care provided to patients.

Report sections

Investigation and inquest
On 6th January 2026, I commenced an investigation into the death of Garth Pretorius, aged 36 years. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 1st May 2026, the narrative conclusion of the inquest was:-Garth Pretorius underwent a microdissection testicular sperm extraction procedure on 19th December 2024 due to azoospermia consequent on Klinefelter’s syndrome. The procedure was uneventful but just over a week later, he became unwell and presented to the out of hours service at Goole Urgent Treatment Centre. He was found to have red flags for sepsis and was told to attend the Emergency Department at Hull Royal Infirmary. Despite the diagnosis of sepsis being made at Goole, the Sepsis 6 Pathway was not instituted and due to confusion over the arrival of an impending emergency at Hull Royal Infirmary, Garth Pretorius and 15 other patients were effectively told to leave the department. As a result of this, there was a delay of approximately 24 hours in commencing appropriate treatment for sepsis which is a time sensitive condition. This delay more than minimally, negligibly or trivially contributed to Garth’s death at Castle Hill Hospital on 3rd January 2025.
Circumstances of the death
Please see attached findings of fact.
Action should be taken
This may include, for example, allocating the necessary resources to fast track the universal adoption of the Manchester Triage System in the Trust.

Similar PFD reports

Shared signals

Related inquiry recommendations

Similar themes

Report details

Reference
2026-0273
Date of report
8 May 2026
Coroner
Paul Marks
Coroner area
City of Kingston upon Hull and East Riding of Yorkshire

Responses identified

Responses identified 1 of 2
1 response not yet linked

Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 3 Jul 2026.

Sent to

1. Chief Executive HUTH
Chief Executive HUTH2.CORONERI am Professor Paul Marks, Senior Coroner, for the Coroner Area of City of Kingston Upon Hull and the County of the East Riding of Yorkshire.3.CORONER’S LEGAL POWERSI make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and

Source links