Source · Prevention of Future Deaths

Kate Louise Pierce

Ref: 2013-0363 Date: 20 Dec 2013 Coroner: John Gittins Area: North Wales (East & Central) Responses identified: 1 / 1 View PDF

A practicing GP failed to diagnose a patient and misled parents, with new evidence casting doubt on his fitness to practice. Previous GMC action stalled, posing a risk of future deaths.

Date 20 Dec 2013
56-day deadline 14 Feb 2014 est.
Responses identified 1 of 1
Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths

Coroner's concerns

AI summary
A practicing GP failed to diagnose a patient and misled parents, with new evidence casting doubt on his fitness to practice. Previous GMC action stalled, posing a risk of future deaths.
View full coroner's concerns
_ On the 29th of March 2006 Kate was taken into the Wrexham Maelor Hospital where she was examined by a Dr It appears from the evidence available that he failed to deal correctly with the diagnosis of Kate's condition and furthermore there is a belief that he may have misled the parents of Kate by indicating that he had sought a second opinion from a colleague before discharging her when this was not in fact the case_ understand that enquiries were made previously by the GMC following a complaint against Dr_ but that no action has been taken due to legal action by_the_Dr and in view of the elapse of a relevant time limit: In the course of my current investigation following Kate's death, a statement has been obtained from a witness namely Dr and& copv of_this is annexed hereto. My view is that this statement casts doubt on DrL fitness to practice and this is of grave concern as my understanding is that he currently continues to practice as a GP within my Coroner Area. In view of this consider that there is a risk of future deaths_

Responses

1 respondent
GMC Regulator / Inspectorate
20 Dec 2013 PDF
Noted

The GMC acknowledges the concerns but states that statutory rules preclude them from investigating events that are more than five years old and they have not received any further complaints since 2007. (AI summary)

View full response
Dear Mr Gittins Re: Investigation touching upon the death of Kate Pierce Thank you for your letter of 20 December 2013 enclosing your Report to Prevent Future Deaths: Iam responding as the officer responsible for the Council's fitness to practise work. We have carefully considered your report and in particular, the matters of concern set out in your report: We are aware of Dr and his involvement in Kate Pierce' care, as this matter was initially brought to our attention on 27 April 2012. We made preliminary enquiries of the Betsi Cadwalader University Health Board and subsequently received a formal complaint from Mr pn 12 July 2012. We considered the complaint by Mr) lin accordance with our statutory framework and initially decided to investigate the case although the events at that time were more than five years old:. Our statutory rules preclude us from investigating events that are more than five years old unless it is in the public interest in the exceptional circumstances to do SO. We were challenged by Dr] Jby way of Judicial Review about our decision to investigate the case even though the events were over five years old. Having taken advice from Counsel we decided to concede the Judicial Review and close our investigation With regard to Dr audit_we received and considered a copy of this audit in late
2012. It relates to Dr practice in 2007 and so was subject to the five year rule We considered whether to waive the rule and concluded that the concerns raised did not satisfy the criteria for uS to waive the rule and no further action was taken: In terms of Dr current fitness to practise, we have not received any further complaints about Dr since 2007 . Additionally, as part of the process of revalidation of a doctor's licence to practise, doctors must have a Responsible Officer whose statutory duties include reporting concerns to us, if they call into question a doctor's current fitness to practise: Our Employer Liaison Advisor who is a senior member The GMC is a charity registered in Regulating doctors England and Wales (1089278) and Scotland (SC037750) Ensuring good medical practice

of staff working in the region has met regularly with Dr Responsible Officer who has expressed no concerns about his current practice_ AIl registered doctors are also now required to revalidate their registration in order to keep their licence to practise. Once every five years, the doctor's Responsible Officer will make a recommendation to us as to whether a doctor should be revalidated and keep their licence to practise_ Revalidation is aimed at supporting doctors in maintaining high standards, and will also help in identifying any concerns early on so that suitable action can be taken_ I hope I have explained why no action by us in this case is proposed and more importantly I been able to address your concerns about Dr I would be happy to take your call on this if you feel it would assist;

Report sections

Investigation and inquest
On the 9"h of May 2013 commenced an investigation into the death f KATE LOUISE PIERCE; Aged 7_ The investigation has not yet concluded and the inquest has not yet been heard.
Circumstances of the death
The deceased is Kate Louise PIERCE (d.o.b. 29/06/2005). Although the matters in question took place on or around the 29" March 2006, Kate eventually died on the 14/03/2013 aged years_ No post-mortem examination has been held and Kate's body has been cremated. The cause of death as per Kate's death certificate is; Acquired Cerebral Palsy, epilepsy and chronic lung disease complications following Meningitis'
Action should be taken
In my opinion urgent action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe your organisation has the power to take such action.

Similar PFD reports

Shared signals

Related inquiry recommendations

Similar themes

Report details

Reference
2013-0363
Date of report
20 December 2013
Coroner
John Gittins
Coroner area
North Wales (East & Central)

Responses identified

Responses identified 1 of 1
All listed responses identified

Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 14 Feb 2014 (estimated).

Sent to

General Medical Council

Source links