The GMC acknowledges the concerns but states that statutory rules preclude them from investigating events that are more than five years old and they have not received any further complaints since 2007. (AI summary)
View full response
2012. It relates to Dr practice in 2007 and so was subject to the five year rule We considered whether to waive the rule and concluded that the concerns raised did not satisfy the criteria for uS to waive the rule and no further action was taken: In terms of Dr current fitness to practise, we have not received any further complaints about Dr since 2007 . Additionally, as part of the process of revalidation of a doctor's licence to practise, doctors must have a Responsible Officer whose statutory duties include reporting concerns to us, if they call into question a doctor's current fitness to practise: Our Employer Liaison Advisor who is a senior member The GMC is a charity registered in Regulating doctors England and Wales (1089278) and Scotland (SC037750) Ensuring good medical practice
of staff working in the region has met regularly with Dr Responsible Officer who has expressed no concerns about his current practice_ AIl registered doctors are also now required to revalidate their registration in order to keep their licence to practise. Once every five years, the doctor's Responsible Officer will make a recommendation to us as to whether a doctor should be revalidated and keep their licence to practise_ Revalidation is aimed at supporting doctors in maintaining high standards, and will also help in identifying any concerns early on so that suitable action can be taken_ I hope I have explained why no action by us in this case is proposed and more importantly I been able to address your concerns about Dr I would be happy to take your call on this if you feel it would assist;