F226

Nursing and Midwifery Council Investigation of systemic concerns

Mid Staffs Inquiry · Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry · Issued 6 February 2013 · Addressed to: NMC

Government responseDepartment of Health and Social Care: Accepted in part (Nov 2013)

DeliveryDHSC and NHS England say partially delivered (Feb 2026)Department of Health and Social Care says in progress (Feb 2015)

Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry

●Inquiry recommendation

To act as an effective regulator of nurse managers and leaders, as well as more front-line nurses, the Nursing and Midwifery Council needs to be equipped to look at systemic concerns as well as individual ones. It must be enabled to work closely with the systems regulators and to share their information and analyses on the working of systems in organisations in which nurses are active. It should not have to wait until a disaster has occurred to intervene with its fitness to practise procedures. Full access to the Care Quality Commission information in particular is vital.

Mid Staffs Inquiry, Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry · 6 Feb 2013 Source PDF →

Published evidence summary

AI-generated evidence summary

In commentary from September 2024 published in February 2026, the Department of Health and Social Care and NHS England stated that the recommendation was partially implemented and ongoing, reporting that the Nursing and Midwifery Council had established a Regulatory Intelligence Unit, enhanced data-sharing protocols, and was reviewing its memorandum of understanding with the Care Quality Commission (DHSC and NHS England, Feb 2026). Previously, in May 2024, the Thirlwall Inquiry legal team noted that the recommendation had been accepted in part, recording that the nursing regulator did not seek a direct role in investigating systems issues because primary responsibility lay with other oversight bodies (The Thirlwall Inquiry legal team, May 2024).

AI-generated summary of the record on this page, checked by a second model and automatic checks, 26 Sep 2026.

Report-level response context

Government responded via "Hard Truths: The Journey to Putting Patients First" (2014), a single document covering all 290 recommendations with a blanket acceptance. Individual recommendation responses were not broken out.

Government response

●Department of Health and Social Care · Accepted in part · 19 Nov 2013

Speaker not recorded. Source: Department of Health, Hard Truths: the Journey to Putting Patients First, volume 2 (Cm 8777-II), November 2013

Accepted in part.
The Nursing and Midwifery Council have made it clear that they are determined to work closely with other regulators, including the Care Quality Commission to share information and analyses, and that it should not have to wait until a disaster has occurred to intervene with its fitness to practise procedures. The Government notes that the Nursing and Midwifery Council have stated that they do not wish to be given the role of directly investigating systems issues given that the primary responsibility for such issues rests with the Care Quality Commission, but that they intend to address the underlying issue identified in this recommendation by working closely with the Care Quality Commission and other regulators to ensure that the most serious matters are appropriately addressed in a systematic manner.

Extract from: Hard Truths: The Journey to Putting Patients First. Volume Two of the Government Response to the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry: Response to the Inquiry's Recommendations

Site note: This is volume two of "Hard Truths: The Journey to Putting Patients First" (Cm 8777-II), the government's response to the Inquiry's 290 recommendations, published by the Department of Health on GOV.UK on 19 November 2013 and dated to that day here. The PDF the row links to is the accessible edition, whose title page reads "January 2014". The Department of Health has been the Department of Health and Social Care since January 2018. The volume says it includes accounts from each of the national organisations the recommendations name, but it does not mark which passage each organisation wrote, so every row is filed under the Department that published it.

Delivery

●DHSC and NHS England say partially delivered · 27 Feb 2026

Since the publication of this Inquiry, the NMC has made a number of improvements aimed at enhancing its data and information sharing capabilities and strengthening how it works with our partners. This includes the introduction of new Memorandums of Understanding (MoUs) and joint working protocols with system partners, many of which were made in direct response to this review.

In 2014 the NMC revised its MoU with the CQC. This was later updated in 2018 and the NMC is currently reviewing this arrangement now. The NMC has also updated its joint working protocol in 2017 which provides more detailed working arrangements in support of the MoU. The NMC have introduced new MoUs with a range of bodies, including the Care Inspectorate, Healthcare Inspectorate Wales, Healthcare Improvement Scotland, and the Regulation and Quality Improvement Authority. These are regularly reviewed to ensure they are fit for purpose.

The NMC developed an information sharing agreement with DBS in 2018, which was last updated in 2020.

In December 2021 the NMC signed up to the Emerging Concerns Protocol in England. More recently, the NMC and other regulators in Northern Ireland endorsed a new Intelligence Sharing Framework to address emerging concerns and share information.

In 2020 the NMC introduced its Regulatory Intelligence Unit (RIU). This represented a significant improvement to the way that it monitor, triangulate and share intelligence about potential patient safety risks with its partners. This team works closely with all internal directorates and external organisations to locate, assess and action all available data and information and have helped the NMC become a more intelligence led and dynamic regulator. RIU is responsible for undertaking a quarterly analysis of FTP data to gain insight into its FTP work and emerging trends or themes, and for responding to or sharing this with system partners for action. This team was introduced in direct response to recommendations made by this Inquiry.

NHS England continues to work alongside key regulators, CQC, Health and Care Professions Council, General Medical Council and the Nursing & Midwifery Council through the Joint Strategic Oversight Group (JSOG) function to provide a dedicated space for regulators to share intelligence and develop aligned approaches to support organisations.

From: The Thirlwall Inquiry: Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version dated April 2025)

Site note: DHSC and NHS England's own account of progress, supplied to the Thirlwall Inquiry in September 2024 and printed in the Inquiry legal team's Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version dated April 2025, published 27 February 2026). It is not a finding of the Inquiry. Their reviewed extent of implementation reads “Partially implemented – Ongoing”. Table row: section 18.2 No. 226, PDF page 541-542.

●Department of Health and Social Care says in progress · 11 Feb 2015

The Nursing and Midwifery Council and the Care Quality Commission have refreshed their Memorandum of Understanding that sets out how and when to share information, and are developing a protocol to support staff in implementing the commitments in it. The Nursing and Midwifery Council provides the Care Quality Commission with data from its work on settings due for inspection and is working to improve the quality and accessibility of this data. It has agreed a data strategy to support those improvements.

The Nursing and Midwifery Council is undertaking an internal quality assurance exercise on its own practice under its Memoranda of Understanding, the results of which will inform Memoranda being developed with other regulators. It will first report on the activity occurring as a result of partnership agreements and then undertake a more qualitative assessment of the impact of its own practice on safety and quality.

In its materials about how to raise concerns, the Nursing and Midwifery Council helps to signpost the role of system regulators to registrants and members of the public.

From: Culture Change in the NHS supporting Annex (annex to Culture change in the NHS: applying the lessons of the Francis Inquiries)

Site note: This is the supporting annex published on 11 February 2015 with "Culture change in the NHS: applying the lessons of the Francis Inquiries" (Cm 9009), attached to the GOV.UK page as "Culture change in the NHS supporting annex". The annex has no title page; that title is GOV.UK's and the PDF's own. Its table has four columns (No., Recommendation, Hard Truths Government response, Progress update), and the row carries the Progress update cell. No column says which organisation wrote an update, so the row is filed under the Department of Health (now the Department of Health and Social Care), which published it.

Site note: The Inquiry addressed this recommendation to the Nursing and Midwifery Council, not to the Department of Health. The annex gives this update in the Department's publication and does not say who wrote it, so the row is the Department's report of the progress made on it.

What other bodies have found

In their own words. These do not change the delivery statement above.

●Thirlwall Inquiry legal team · 15 May 2024

This recommendation was accepted in part by the Government.

In its July 2013 response, the Nursing and Midwifery Council stated it did not wish to be given the role of directly investigating systems issues, and that primary responsibility lay with the Care Quality Commission and other regulators. The Nursing and Midwifery Council said it would work more closely with the systems regulators and share their information and analyses on the working of systems in organisation in which nurses and midwives are active.

In the 2015 Culture Change report, the Government said that the Nursing and Midwifery Council had updated its memoranda of understanding with the Care Quality Commission, setting out how and when they would share information.

From: The Thirlwall Inquiry: Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version of 15 May 2024)

Site note: The Thirlwall Inquiry legal team's own notes on implementation, from its Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version of 15 May 2024). The review does not colour its Extent of Implementation cell for this recommendation green; it leaves the cell uncoloured where a recommendation was rejected, where evidence of implementation was insufficient, or where steps had been taken but implementation was not yet complete. Table row: section 16.2 No. 226, PDF page 501-502.

How this page is built

The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.