Source · Prevention of Future Deaths

Gerald Werrett

Ref: 2014-0355 Date: 1 Aug 2014 Responses identified: 4 / 4 View PDF

Catastrophic failures in chest drain insertion included unlabelled and misinterpreted chest X-rays, incomplete review of images, and a lack of patient examination prior to the procedure.

Date 1 Aug 2014
56-day deadline 26 Sep 2014 est.
Responses identified 4 of 4
Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths

Coroner's concerns

AI summary
Catastrophic failures in chest drain insertion included unlabelled and misinterpreted chest X-rays, incomplete review of images, and a lack of patient examination prior to the procedure.
View full coroner's concerns
In the my circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you: Chest drains inserted by a number of medical disciplines and clearly this event has shown Ghat basic failures can have catastrophic consequences, the areas identified during the inquest included: A lead anatomical marker was not used when the chest X-ray Both chest X-rays were incorrectly labelled, and this error was not identied by the clinician The chest X-ray that was looked at was misinterpreted Both chest X-rays were not considered:
5. The cardiac silhouette was not interpreted correctly Mr: Werrett was not examined prior to the insertion of the chest drain: North Bristol NHS Trust have clearly learnt a valuable lesson following this incident and have devised a safety check list and guideline which could be of assistance to the wider hedicavoemunitye North Bristol NHS Trust have indicated that they would be willing to sherethe check list and guideline which if implemented could avoid a similar event happening_again

Responses

4 respondents
The Royal College of Anaesthetists Education
29 Aug 2014 PDF
Action Planned

The Royal College of Anaesthetists will ensure particular attention is attached to correct site location at the next curriculum review. They have also issued an alert to their network of senior anaesthetists and requested reports related to chest drain insertion incidents be forwarded to them. (AI summary)

View full response
Dear Mrs Voisin; Further to my letter of I1th August 2014,regarding the death of Mr G T Werrett the Regulation 28 Report; I have now investigated training and education aspects of chest drain insertion for anaesthetists Please note the following information together with a summary of appropriate actions taken or planned. Training and trainees chest drain insertion is covered at several stages of the anaesthesia training curriculum_ Initial insertion techniques are assessed at the basic level of training and management responsibilities for the procedure then progress through training; and across increasingly complex environments. Subsequent training and work-place based assessment advances to the longer term management of patients with chest drains and dealing with emergency patients and trauma situations. These areas of training are under annual review by our Training Committee and we will ensure particular attention is attached to correct site location at the next review. Further to general anaesthesia requirements for training in chest drain insertion; additional training and assessment takes place in several sub-specialty areas e.g. paediatrics, obstetrics and intensive care_ This may take place in the advanced or higher levels of training andlor subsequent to gaining to the Specialist Register of the GMC and progressing into sub-specialty interest areas. Career education for anaesthetists who are entered on the specialist register; or for those who opt-out of advanced training at the Specialty Doctor level, there is an ongoing need to maintain competence in all areas of clinical practice. This is a requirement of revalidation and necessary to maintain a licence to practice with the General Medical Council. This competence may be achieved by sub-specialty development, engagement on courses such as Advanced Life Support (ALS) o workplace experience coupled with attendance at events and conferences which are quality assessed and recognised for Continuous Professional Development (CPD) points by the College. Several past professional CPD events have been identified where the use of chest drains; particularly with the inclusion of chest ultrasound, has been covered. We can find no similar planned events in The RCoA: Advancing Patient Care and Promoting Safety Patron: HRH The Princess Royal REGISTERED CHARITY NO: 1013887 VAT REGISTRATIOM NO: GB 927 2364 18 REGISTERED CHARITY AN SCOTLAND NO:Sc037737 Storey and entry grade

our calendar for the immediate future; however; when this occurs we will highlight the need to emphasise further safe practice at insertion. In addition, we have also identified this is a frequent topic for events managed by colleagues at the Intensive Care Society and have highlighted to them a need to stress safe practice and double checking the correct site before insertion: Actions to highlight the issue to other providers of events anaesthesia CPD credit will be progressed through our safety network as below. General aspects The College was alerted to & specific chest drain insertion problem earlier this year which led to notification to our safety network in March 2014. The initial notification and subsequent alert were completely anonymised; however, from the detail you have provided we now believe this was the same incident you now highlight and our ongoing work with colleagues will focus on lessons to be learned and shared from this situation_ You would wish to be aware ofan alert issued by the National Patient Safety Agency (NPSA) in 2008 regarding chest drains (http ILwwwnrls npsa nhs uk/resources/?Entryld45_59882 and this is still a point of reference for anaesthetists and others in their safe use. Despite the closure of the NPSA we believe the responsibility for these alerts continues through the safety department within NHS England and we have advised them of this death, with anonymised detail, and requested they review the alert and consider its re-issue. Ihave reminded each of the directors in the College, with responsibility for training and education, about the need to continue to stress the importance of correct chest drain insertion techniques at all stages of professional development and beyond this into continuing practice. As stated in my previous letter; I have also issued an alert to our network of senior anaesthetists, risk managers and clinical directors (approximately 800 healthcare staff across the UK) about the need to check local policy and procedures to ensure ongoing vigilance where chest drains are to be used. Finally, through our Safe Anaesthesia Liaison Group we will now ask for reports related to chest drain insertion incidents to be forwarded to uS as soon as occur S we may monitor any incidence of problems more closely and take remedial action where necessary this provides reassurance of the gravity we attach to this incident and the steps we are taking to learn from it to avoid recurrence_
British Thoracic Society
3 Sep 2014 PDF
Noted

The British Thoracic Society notes the concerns and refers to their existing guidelines on safe chest drain insertion, highlighting that these are more comprehensive than the NPSA information. They are unsure if local guidelines were available at the Trust where the event occurred. (AI summary)

View full response
Dear Mrs Voison Gerald Trevor WERRETT Thank you for asking the British Thoracic Society to provide report following the inquest on the above individual: am a Consultant Physician and work at the University Hospital of North Staffordshire: am replying on the basis that am the Honorary Secretary of the British Thoracic Society and a Consultant Respiratory Physician for over 20 years: note that the invitation for comment has been produced on a regulation 28 to prevent future deaths. The inquest report have seen states that the chest drain was wrongly inserted and this apparently contributed to patient's death: While clearly having minimal details on which to comment, note that the Trust has developed a safety check list which they are willing to share with other parties Regrettably, from chest drains is well recognised. The National Patient Safety Agency (NPSA) produced Rapid Response Report and supporting information May 2008, The latter give background information and refers very clearly to the Guideline which was developed by the British Thoracic Society in 2003 The Rapid Response report states clearly questions that the team should ask about before placement of chest drains_ In 2010 the British Thoracic Society published an 82 page update on management of pleural disease which includes safe insertion of chest drains Thorax 2010 (August) Vol. 65, supplement 2)- This publication is freely available in most medical libraries and, more importantly, is available on the British Thoracic Society website which is open to all individuals: It is one of the most frequently visited sections of the Society' s website. Recognising the problems that can occur with the placement of chest drains, in part mandated by the NPSA, many hospitals have already produced their own local guidelines, based upon those of the the harm

British Thoracic Society: am unsure if such Iocal guidelines were available at the Trust where the event occurred and how well they were followed The British Thoracic Society thanks You for the interest in our guidelines and notes that these are more comprehensive and recent than information available from the NPSA With kind regards
Department of Health Central Government
9 Sep 2014 PDF
Action Planned

NHS England has established a Reference Group to develop National Standards for Operating Department Practice by early 2015. If North Bristol Healthcare NHS Trust shares its checklist, there may be an opportunity to include it as a resource for other Trusts when the standards are implemented. (AI summary)

View full response
'o/14 From Rt Hon Norman Lamb MP Minister of State for Care and Support Department Department of Health of Health Richmond House 79 Whitehall London SWIA 2NS Mrs M Voisin HM Senior Coroner for Avon The Coroner's Court The Courthouse Old Weston Road Flax Bourton 2 9 SEP 2014 BS48 1UL Va Thank you for your letter to Jeremy Hunt about the death of Mr Werrett am saddened to hear of Mr Werrett's death, and offer my sincere condolences to his family: Your report details the events prior to Mr Werrett's death which included X-rays which were inverted and mislabelled, resulting in the drain being inserted on the wrong side of Mr Werrett's body: This resulted in an additional drain, which was found to have been a contributory factor in his death You listed a number of concerns about the insertion of these chest drains and the mistakes made in Mr Werret's care. These have, understand, been addressed by North Bristol NHS Trust_ However; have noted your suggestion that the safety check list and guideline that the Trust implemented since Mr Werrett's death might usefully be shared with other organisations in the NHS to prevent future deaths. The risks of inserting a chest drain on the wrong side are already to known to the NHS through patient safety incident reports received through the National Reporting and Learning System (NRLS): The NRLS is a database of patient safety incident reports submitted voluntarily by organisations across the NHS_ Trusts regularly upload incident reports from their local systems to the NRLS specifically for purposes of learning: Data is interrogated by national patient safety experts to spot trends, specific incidents of concern, or emerging risks to patient safety_ The WHO Surgical Safety Checklist was designed as a tool to improve the safety of surgery by reducing deaths and complications. The checklist specifically addresses has

Department of Health issues relating to wrong site surgery which includes the insertion of drains An NPSA Alert issued in 2009 recommended that the checklist should be adapted for local use. The alert can be found at httpILwww nrls npsa nhs_uklresources/?entryid45-59860. NHS England (NHSE) has recently established a Reference Group to take forward the recommendation made by the Surgical Never Events Taskforce in February
2014. This Taskforce was commissioned to examine and clarify the reasons for the persistence of these patient safety incidents, and to produce a report making recommendations on how they can be eradicated http Iwww england nhs uklourworklpatientsafetylnever-eventslsurgical: One of the key recommendations in this report is to develop National Standards for Operating Department Practice that will support all providers of NHS-funded care to develop and maintain their own more detailed standardised local procedures. The scope of the standards will cover all surgical procedures and not just those being undertaken in the operating theatre environment: Current timescale for the development of the standards is early 2015. Once the standards have been developed the next phase of this work will be to address how the standards should be implemented and this will include requirements for educators, commissioners and regulators. If North Bristol Healthcare NHS Trust would share the checklist it has developed with NHS England there be opportunity to include it as a resource for other Trusts to use or adapt when the standards are implemented: hope that this information is helpful and thank you for bringing the circumstances of Mr Werrett's death to our attention: Ap02 € NORMAN LAMB may
The College of Emergency Medicine Education
16 Sep 2014 PDF
Action Planned

The College of Emergency Medicine will highlight the case and investigation findings in its next Safety Newsflash and share the North Bristol NHS Trust's safety checklist and guidelines on their website once received. (AI summary)

View full response
Dear Mrs Voisin, Regulation 28 Report Gerald Trevor Werrett Thank you for alerting us to the case of Mr Werrett in your report received on 5th August: The College shares your concerns, and will take the following actions: Highlight this case and the findings of the investigation the next Safety Newsflash to its members Share North Bristol NHS Trust's safety check list and guidelines on our website once received: Following this incident; the things we feel that should be reviewed locally are whether the environment supports the review of X-rays (e.g. availability of IT in the room where the procedure was carried out), if the doctor was trained in the use of ultrasound guidance for insertion of chest drains and whether ultrasound was available, in addition to the availability of rapid 24 hour reporting: The College is dedicated to reducing the risk of 'never events' and promoting safety in the workplace, through guidance and regular safety news updates; Thanks again for bringing our attention to this issue With kind regards Chair, Quality in Emergency Care Committee Excellence in Emergency Care Incorporated by Royal Charter; 2008 Registered Charity number 122689 The Flax key

Report sections

Investigation and inquest
On 24th April 2014 commenced an investigation into the death of Gerald Trevor WERRETT , aged 67 The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 25th July 2014. The conclusion of the inquest was that Mr Werrett died due to: la Bilateral bronchopneumonia Ib Chronic obstructive airways disease II Ischaemic heart disease His death was contributed to by a misplaced chest drain and the conclusion given was natural causes contributed to by neglect
Circumstances of the death
Mr, Werrett was admitted to hospital on February 2014 with infective exacerbation of his chronic obstructive airways disease together with a number of co-morbidities . During his admission he required a number of chest drains to be inserted to treat his condition: On 31s March 2014 he required a further drain to be inserted and two chest X-rays were taken. It was clear from the evidence and indeed not disputed that the chest X-rays were inverted and mislabelled which resulted in the registrar misinterpreting the one X-ray that she looked at (she did not Iook at both), this resulted in a chest drain being put in the left side when in fact the pneumothorax was on the right: Mr: Werrett subsequently required a chest drain to be inserted on the right as well and 28th

Mr: Werretts treating consultant gave evidence and said that the chest drain Was reserted; having two chest drains caused pain and made him less mobile with cooggldifficelted, the safwcearfystried desperately to rectify the situation but that the secandifficetiessang drain hadran impactsand & contributory factor to his death. The incident on March 2014 resulted in a never event the Trust have now rolled oueanaafety check list f0 be completed prior to the insertion of a chest drain together with guidelines for the insertion of chest drains
Action should be taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe you [ANDIOR your organisation] have the power to take such action:

Similar PFD reports

Shared signals

Related inquiry recommendations

Similar themes

Report details

Reference
2014-0355
Date of report
1 August 2014

Responses identified

Responses identified 4 of 4
All listed responses identified

Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 26 Sep 2014 (estimated).

Sent to

College of Emergency Medicine
Department of Health and Social Care
British Thoracic Society
Royal College of Anaesthetists

Source links