Source · Prevention of Future Deaths

Edward Maher, James Dunsby and Craig Roberts

Ref: 2015-0228 Date: 20 Jul 2015 Coroner: Louise Hunt Area: Birmingham & Solihull Responses identified: 1 / 2 View PDF

A new tracker system failed to identify static soldiers, commanders lacked awareness and training on critical heat illness guidance, and risk assessment staff were untrained. A disjointed reporting system also impedes accurate heat illness data.

Date 20 Jul 2015
56-day deadline 15 Sep 2015
Responses identified 1 of 2
Service Personnel related deaths

Coroner's concerns

AI summary
A new tracker system failed to identify static soldiers, commanders lacked awareness and training on critical heat illness guidance, and risk assessment staff were untrained. A disjointed reporting system also impedes accurate heat illness data.
View full coroner's concerns
(1) A new tracker system has been introduced recently: The new system's slow man/static function does not work: It is therefore still the case that those running the exercise have no means to identify static or slow moving soldiers.

(2) Those in a senior commanding position were unaware that the new tracker system's slow manlstatic function did not work until the inquest this came to light as asked for a demonstration of the new system which was undertaken on the Malvern's on Sunday 21 June 2015. was informed the slow manlstatic function did not work heard no evidence that any steps have been taken to address this problem and no interim measures have been put in place to mitigate the risk_ (3) Witnesses at the inquest confirmed that before this tragedy they Were unaware of the main guidance for heat illness namely JSP539_ joint service code of practice climatic illness and injury in the armed forces Version 2:1 November 2012 Some witnesses in a senior position AA and SR44 claimed , retrospectivelv that this guidance was not applicable to this endurance exercise_ Others and confirmed it was the current guidance and no separate guidance had been issued for exercises with this specialist group. am concerned that the MOD still do not have a clear plan and guidance for the detection of Heat illness in this type of exercise and have failed to instruct commanders of the importance of adhering to JSP539 for this type of activity: (4) Senior commanders had received no training before this tragedy on JSP539. There was no clear system for disseminating information to different regiments and no means to check those commanding this type of exercise had the requisite knowledge and training: (5) Senior commanders were unaware that the staff who completed the risk assessment for this exercise and who conducted the exercise had not been trained in the preparation of risk assessments_ The risk assessment used simply adopted a risk assessment that had been prepared by the lead regular unit: (6) Senior commanders were unaware that the staff who conducted this exercise were unaware of climatic guidance in JSP539 and therefore did not understand the implications of the weather forecast and the imporfance of heat illness and its treatment. Senior commanders were unaware that the reservist units had a different build up to test week: The reservists had a military skills week the week before test week whereas the signals regiment had build up marches. None of the signals regiment students suffered heat illness (8) The general system for reporting heat illness cases is disjointed and results in cases missed and therefore not reported. Inaccurate data impedes the ability of the MOD to assess the true incidence of heat illness during exercises and to in place any plan that's required to mitigate ongoing risks of heat illness_ (9) The tracker system used at the time was known to be unfit for purpose in that the slow man/static function did not work effectively. No commander at any level addressed this deficiency in any directions to staff or further risk assessments_ (10)A previous fatality, Soldier G see LAIT report October 2012, had identified that treatment for casualties should be within the "golden hour" . In addition following Private Pooles death in 2009 it was identified that the tracker was not fit for purpose and standard operating procedures were issues dated January 2011_ None of these recommendations were_implemented by_those _involved in this very being put exercise_ am concerned that Jessons had not been learnt from these previous events. There appears to be no clear pathway for communicating this sort of information. (11)There is no system in place to ensure that WBGT readings obtained at Sennybridge camp are communicated to exercise commanders in the area during the day: (12)There was no involvement of a doctor experienced in heat illness detection and treatment when devising the medical plan for this exercise; the medical plan was prepared by a junior combat medical technician_ (13)There was no prior Iiaison with the NHS and Mountain rescue before this exercise about what their involvement might be in the case of any injuries or illness_

Responses

1 respondent
Ministry of Defence Central Government
PDF
Action Planned

An upgrade to the tracker system is scheduled to take place before the end of the calendar year to address data volume issues. The policy for endurance exercises will be reviewed and revised by March 2016, and two further inquiries will be conducted by the Ministry of Defence. (AI summary)

View full response
MINISTRY OF DEFENCE FLOOR 5 ZONE B MAIN BUILDING Ministry WHITEHALL LONDON SWIA 2HB of Defence Telephone: 020 7218 9000 (Switchboard) PENNY MOADAUNT MP MinisTer OF STATE FOR THE ARMED FORCES DIMSU/4/I1 l September 2015 AAv Mr tut Thank you for your letter of 20 July in which you enclosed a Copy of your Regulation 28 Report following the Inquest into the deaths of Corporal James Dunsby, Lance Corporal Craig Roberts and Lance Corporal Edward Maher: As you will be aware, my Department takes very seriously its relationship with HM Coroners and we fully recognise how important it is that we learn all possible lessons to ensure that deaths under similar circumstances in the future can be prevented. We are also committed to supporting our servicemen and their families and we recognise fully that it is unacceptable to lose three soldiers in such circumstances: In your report you have raised concerns about a number of issues which will address in the paragraphs below: A new tracker system has been introduced recently: The new system's slow manlstatic tunction does not work. It is therefore still the case that those running the exercise have no means t0 identify static or slow moving soldiers: The new tracker system was introduced in to service in November 2014 and first used on an exercise in January 2015. The system functions correctly in that it provides alerts if any beacon breaches the slow moving parameters However there are challenges in how this is interpreted by those using it, as the system can not identify the cause (e-g: an individual taking a break or stopping to fill water bottles) which can overload the operators making it difficult to identify those at risk: In addition there are issues with system's ability to cope with the volume of data it receives when in continuous contact with a large number of beacons, as this was not how it was designed. This will be rectified in an upgrade scheduled to take place before the end of this calendar year: In order to overcome the issues with interpretation of the slow man/static function in the intervening period, the following mitigation measures have been put in place: Mrs Louise Hunt HM Senior Coroner the of Birmingham and Solihull Coroner's Court 50 Newton Street Birmingham BN4 6NE the City -

Each candidate's beacon is visually monitored by Directing Staff to ensure they are on track; If their position is not updating automatically the indicator on screen changes colour;, alerting Directing Staif that there may be a problem: The rate of refresh of the system has been reduced to once every 5 minutes, which overcomes some of the issues with both overload on Directing Staff and the system itself, brief stops (e-g: to check navigation) are less likely to be detected: Directing Staff at Check Points will alert the Command Vehicle if a candidate does not arrive at the expected time. Where a candidate's pace or location raises cause for concern a quick reaction force (QRF) is immediately sent to their last known location; In addition t0 the QRF (e.g: if are addressing another issues) one of the directing staff is able to move from the closest check point to their last known location to investigate as necessary: The system allows text messaging between candidate and Directing Staff and is used t0 check candidates' status and location_ No candidates are allowed to commence or continue the exercise until the Directing Staff have confirmation from the system that their beacon is working: Spare beacons are available at checkpoints and any delays while these are allocated and checked does not impact on candidate exercise times: 2 Those in a senior commanding position were unaware that the new tracker systems slow man/static function did not work until the inquest- this came to light &8 asked for a demonstration of the new system which was undertaken on the Malvem's on Sunday 21 June 2015. was informed the slow manlstatic function did not work heard no evidence that any steps have been taken t0 address this problem and no interim measures have been in place to mitigate the risk; All commanders on the exercise now have a full understanding of the new tracker system; its capabilities and limitations. Representatives from the company who produce the system attended the last exercise (and will attend future iterations) to update on any issues and better understand the concerns of the Directing Slaff. In addition the company are contracted to provide direct support to exercises as well as 24/7 remote advice as required_ Upgrades outlined under Point 1 should address remaining concerns; however to_ ensure all matters raised during the inquest and in the various investigations are being addressed, a meeting will take place in October between the delivery authorities (Defence Equipment and Support) and the Directing Staff: The timing of this meeting will ensure all requirements are captured and either addressed or alternative mitigations put in place before the next planned selection exercise. as they put

3. Witnesses at the inquest confirmed that before this tragedy they were unaware of the main guidance for heat illness namely JSP539-joint service code of practice- climatic illness and injury in the armed forces Version 2:1 November 2012. Some witnesses in & very senior position -AA and SR44- clalmed, retrospectively that this guidance was not applicable to this endurance exercise. Others and confirmed it was the current guidance and no separate guidance had been issued for exercises with this specialist group: am concerned that the MOD still do not have a clear plan and guidance for the detection of Heat illness in this type of exercise and have failed to instruct commanders of the importance of adhering to JSP539 for this type of activity: JSP 539 provides the principles which should be applied by all UK Armed Forces in order to minimise the risk of climatic injurles. To ensure all commanders are aware of the importance of adhering to JSP 539,the Defence Safety Authority recently issued an Urgent Satety Advice notice on Climatic Illness and Injury Awareness and Prevention This advice reminds Armed Forces personnel of the sources of information and risk assessments to be undertaken in order to try and prevent and treat heat illness (and cold injury) The Medical Plan for the exercise was completely revised in advance of the most recent iteration (June 2015). Prior to all future exercises this plan must be reviewed and signed off by the Senior_Medical Officer and Chief Instructor of the Lead Regular Unit (see response to Point 7 tor further detail): Oversight is provided by medical staff in HQ Specialist Military Units. The revised Medical Plan requires that a comprehensive training package on climatic illness and injury and JSP539 is established. This has improved knowledge and awareness of the JSP and climatic illness and injury: In addition, the Medical Plan has introduced a requirement for all professional medics on the exercise to conduct virtual exercises and rehearsals prior t0 future exercises
4. Senior commanders had received no training before this tragedy on JSP539. There was no clear system for disseminating information t0 different regiments and no means t check those commanding this type of exercise had the requisite knowledge and training: Commanders of Specialist Units are all now briefed on JSP 539 as part of their pre-appointment training: All specialist units will now receive appropriate training packages on JSP 539, heat illness and its treatment If a requirement t0 operate outside the parameters of JSP 539 is identified by the Directing Staff;, then a formal waiver must be issued by Director Specialist Military Units. This approval requires an explanation of the measures in place to justify such deviation as well as the operational necessity for them:: The Medical Plan for the exercise provides for training of all Directing Staff in JSP 539 and is signed off by the Training Officer of the Specialist Military Unit responsible Furthermore, all students are required t0 sign declarations that they have read and understood Standard Operating Instructions (which include JSP 539), which ensures they are aware of all relevant procedures: Military

5. Senior commanders were unaware that the statf who completed the risk assessment for this exercise and who conducted the exercise had not been trained in the preparation of risk assessments: The risk assessment used simply adopted a risk assessment that had been prepared by the lead regular unit: Training in the conduct of Risk Assessments was addressed in the immediate aftermath of the incident in 2013 and following the improvement notice issued by the HSE: In addition to this, work is being conducted to review how the organisation can improve training in this area and HQ specialist military 4nits is reviewing and rewriting its Training Governance and Assurance Policy which will lead to further changes in the policy and procedures of subordinate units. The revised Training Governance and Assurance was completed in August and changes by the subordinate units will be in place before the end of the calendar year; prior to the next iteration of the exercise_
6. Senior commanders were unaware that the staff who conducted this exercise were unaware of climatic guidance in JSP539 and therefore did not understand the implications of the weather forecast and the importance of heat illness and its treatment; As explained under 4 above, all specialist units will now receive appropriate training packages on JSP 539,heat illness and its treatment. 7_ Senior commanders were unaware that the reservist units had & different build up to test week: The reservists had & military skills week the week before test week whereas the signals regiment had build up marches None of the signals regiment students suffered heat illness. The overall command of the exercise, including the preparatory training immediately preceding il, nOw rests with the Commanding Otticer of the Lead Reguiar Unit This has simpiified the reporting chains and command responsibilities and ensured that information can be provided to a single command chain which has the authority to make changes to the exercise in light of this information as appropriate: In consultation with the HSE the preparatory training undertaken by Reserve Units was reviewed following the incident: Following this Reserves were included in the build up marches undertaken by Regulars in the week preceding the exercise: A further review was underiaken at the end of June 2015 which concluded that this had failed to fully mitigate the risk A further change was made prior to the most recent exercise with Reserves now undertaking instructor-led marches (at controlled pace) before moving on to the more demanding build up marches undertaken by Regulars As explained below; have also directed that a non-statutory inquiry be conducted t look at, amongst other issues, the requirement of the Reserve Units to undertake this exercise and the exact training requirement dictated by their role. Policy _ point

8 The general system tor reporting heat illness cases is disjointed and results in cases being missed and therefore not reported. Inaccurate data impedes the ability of the MOD to assess the true incidence of heat illness during exercises and to put in place any plan thats required to mitigate ongoing risks of heat illness. acknowledge that there have been fallings in the accurate recording of cases of heat illness historically: The Defence People Health Boards Heat Illness Working Group; in collaboration with the Defence Safety Authority, is working to improve the process tor reporting of heat Illness and injury: Progress will be reported to the Defence People Health Board in October and will write to you in November with an update on this important work: The revised Medical Plan for the specialist exercise requires prompt and accurate reporting of all climatic injuries, s0 as to enable an accurate capture of the required data. At the time of the incident there was no mechanism to record Reserve medical information on the Defence Medical Inforation Capability Programme (DMICP) There was a system for Medical Reporting of cases of heat illness but this relied on the use of paper forms which may have contributed to failings in their recording: Medical information relating to Reservists is now being loaded on to DMICP , thus statistics relating to climatic injuries sustalned by both Regular and Reserve personnel will show up in health audits by Defence Statistics. This has been reflected in the exercise Medical Plan:
9. The tracker system used at the time was known to be unfit for purpose in that the slow man/static function did not work eftectively: No commander at any level addressed this deficiency in any directions to staff or further risk assessments: accept that there were issues with the tracker system in place at the time, which was not designed to provide the slow man/static functionality being developed in the new system: also accept that these issues were not appropriately mitigated by other means. Our actions to address these issues are outlined at Point 1_
10. A previous tatality, Soldier G see LAIT report October 2012, had identified that treatment for casualties should be within the "golden hour" . In additlon following Private Poole's death in 2009 it was identified that the tracker was not fit for purpose and standard operating procedures were issues dated January 2011. None of these recommendations were implemented by those involved in this exercise. Lam concerned that lessons had not been learnt from these previous events. There appears t0 be no clear pathway for communicating this sort of information. There is a foral process in place for the capturing of lessons leamtidentified (Land Forces Standing Order (LFSO) 1118 Learning Lessons in the Land Environment): Lessons are managed through the Defence Lessons Implementation and Management System (DLIMS) process which provides for a comprehensive way in which to consider that appropriate lessons are leamt, and that all appropriate steps are taken to prevent or minimise a recurrence. There is a clear and well established process, which is now being reinforced through the Training and Governance Policy review referred to under

Point 5 which will formalise the DLIMS process as a core part of the biannual review of normal training, including exercises such as this. The lessons Identified in the two incidents You refer to were captured by this process The 'Golden Hour' is nomally applicable to circumstances where patients have suffered from major trauma or severe injury and need to access deiinitive emergency treatmentia that time frame. It is not always relevant to environmental injurylillness which should be judged on & case by case basis: In cases ol heat stroke the immediate and most pressing medical and first aid action (after attending t0 airway breathing and circulation) is to cool the patient as quickly as possible: The cooling can often be initiated in the ield fairiy quickly and, in some circumstances, this can be done more effectively in the pre- hospital environment: In the case of the issues with the tracker in use at the time of Marine Poole's death; work was undertaken to enhance its capability and improvements were introduced in December 2010. It was subsequently identified that there was a need to replace te system and this led to revised set of "User Requirements' which included staterenta taken from the Lessons Identified: The time it took to implement the new was nota result of a failure to identify the lessons, but a result of the complexity of procuring such a piece of equipment: accept that further mitigation should have been put in place t0 address the gap in capability while the systers were being upgradedand pepCaced;chese issues have now been addressed through the improvements in training_ andahe conduct of risk assessments and improved awareness throughout the command chain of the capabilities of the system:
11. There is no system in place to ensure that WBGT readings obtained at are communicated to exercise commanders in the area during the Sennybridge camp day: accept that the lack of a to obtain and monitor WBGT readings from Sennybridge Camp was a aling; Having reviewed this it has been concluded that_ obtaining readings from Sennybridge Camp would be of limited value in determining the climatic risks in the training area, which is some distance from and oi different terrain t0 the camp area: WBGT readings are now taken at the command vehicle (located in the exercise area) and at the highest point in order to understand the range of conditions out on the course being used They are continuously monitored throughout the exercise and any changes in the readings are recorded in the communications log and all check points notified of these and any control measures required as a result: In order to improve on this and to provide as accurate information a8 possible a scoping exercise is currently being conducted to look at establishing further WBGT meters across the routes used This will allow geographical variations to be better taken into account and Dynamic Risk Assessments t0 be conducted t0 inform route planning and overall timings andlor objectives in light of the prevailing conditions: This work will be completed in time to allow any changes to be implemented in advance of the next iteration of the exercise. system system

12 There was no involvement of a doctor experienced in heat illness detection and treatment when devising the medical plan for this exercise; the medical plan was prepared by a junior combat medical technician. The revised Medical Plan, outlined at point 3, put in place for the most recent and all future exercises is to be reviewed (and signed) by the Senior Medical Officer and Chief Instructor of the Training Squadron from the Lead Regular Unit; tollowing consultation with the medical team in the higher headquarters. The Senior Medical Officer is trained in and has experience of heat illness detection as well as wider medical risks with exercises of this type: are also able to draw on the expertise within the organisation and across the Defence medical community The revised Medical Plan also requires that a professional medic (who would be experienced in heat illness detection and treatment) , reviews the Medical Plan each to the start of exercises, taking account of the prevailing and forecast climatic conditions, route changes, availability of support assets and any students who are considered to be 'at risk' changes to the Medical Plan must be made in consultation with the Senior Medical Officer and Chief Instructor from the Lead Regular Unit; 13 There was no prior Iiaison with the NHS and Mountain rescue before this exercise about what their involvement might be in the case of any injuries or illness: Local Commanders now Iiaise with local Police and Mountain Rescue prior to the start of every exercise. In addition; communications are established with the closest Search and Rescue location t0 confirm the communications plan and Medical Staff are required to liaise with local hospitals: The Medical Plan directs that rehearsals and virtual exercises be undertaken to consider the response, including timelines; to medical emergencies. In addressing your concerns have sought assurances from the Royal Army; Royal Air Force and Joint Forces Command as to whether any wider lessons from your recommendations apply to their activities: have received assurances that activities are conducted in line with the appropriate MOD policies, for example on risk assessments, climatic illness and injury: This work has identified a number of improvements; most notably the Royal identified lessons in three of its training activities all of which have been addressed or will be addressed by March 2016 with mitigation in place until that time. We continue to work with the Health and Safety Executive t0 take forward their recommendations and seek their advice on implementing improved processes; have directed that two further inquiries be conducted by the Ministry of Defence. Firstly; a Service Inquiry will look at the events of 13 July 2013 t0 try and ensure that all safety- related lessons, including those identified in your Regulation 28 report, are learnt for endurance training across the whole of Defence: This will be conducted by a Service Inquiry Panel, convened by the Director General Defence Safety Authority: which will provide an independent;, thorough and objective review outside of the chain of command: In order to ensure all relevant issues are captured and considered by the Service Inquiry; have also written t0 the Director of Specialist Military Units, They day; ! prior Any likely Nawy; Navy

Commander Joint Forces Command and the Chief of the General Staff directing that they identify areas of arduous activity that may be relevant to the Service Inquiry and make these known to the Service Inquiry panel: Secondly; a non-statutory inquiry wil look at the care and support provided t0 the bereaved families in this case and to those members of the MOD who were closely involved in the incident; and review the training needs analysis for the reserve units involved in this incident in light of their current role hope that this response helps to address your specific concerns regarding the tragic deaths Of Corporal Dunsby; Lance Cororai Roberts Lance Corporal Maher am content for you to copy this response to the Chief Coroner and other Interested Persons have also undertaken to place & copy of this response in the Library of the House of Commons: will do So When Parliament returs trom the conference recess in October; a8 per your request for a slight delay to rightly aford the bereaved families time t consider my reply: PENNY MORDAUNT MP

Report sections

Investigation and inquest
In July 2013 commenced an investigation into the deaths of Craig Roberts, James Dunsby and Edward Maher. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 14lh July 2015. The conclusion of the inquest was a narrative as per the attached record of inquests
Circumstances of the death
Craig Roberts, Edward Maher and James Dunsby were all reserve soldiers who were taking part in the a selection process for a specialist unit being held at Brecon Beacons in South Wales in 2013 Reservists have to successfully complete a part time 6 month selection pathway made up of two phases, the aptitude selection (leading up to test week), and then for successful candidates, a continuation phase. Aptitude training started with an induction weekend followed by 8 training weekends culminating in a 2 week training camp at Sennybridge Induction weekend involved a medical, briefings and fitness test first 2 training weekends comprised of hill preparation inc briefings on map reading, skills, medical matters and kit requirements_ Hills preparation weekend concluded with a combat fitness test in uniform, wearing boots and carrying a weight to be completed in a set time. The remaining 6 weekends involved a series of and night marches in the same area as test week. Reserve Units (RU)1 and 2 combine for these activities Only 20 out of 67 candidates from RU 1 got through to test week Most reservists arrived at in Wales on 04/07 . The first week of the camp July The day Camp was spent by reservists as follows: 05/07 6 mile run. 08/07 heat injury presentation by 1U. 07/07 a march over 24 km was to be complete within 4hrs 45 mins due to the weather reserve instructors adjusted the march, reduced the weight to be carried, provided additional water at Pen Y Fan and Windy Gap for drinking and emergency cooling, carried the march out in groups, removed the time limit and provided sweepers The next 4 days were military skills. 12/07 was a rest with a final briefing and handover to Signals Regiment who were responsible for test week: The Signals Regiment run their own course open to a variety of regiments course includes an aptitude phase and test week The Signals Regiment are a regular army unit and they were able to train for a continuous two week period in the run up to test week in the relevant training area undertaking "Lodestone" marches. Distance and weight to carry were increased over time against speed. They were acclimatising to the environment and conditions in the build up to test week Notably the week before test week saw increasing temperatures from 21.4C on 05/07 Up to 26.3 on 12/07 (temp from Sennybridge as this is the best available data) For the test march on 13th 2013 there were 37 reservists made up of reserve units and 2 and 41 regular troops from the Signals Regiment: Directing staff (DS) for the march were made up of Signals regiment and RU staff: Test week briefing to DS and candidates was undertaken by solider 1B on 12/07/13. Test march covered 26.4km (as the crow flies) through check points, actual distance estimated as 29-30km depending on the route taken. Candidates had to carry a bergan weighing no less than 49lbs, not including food or water were required to carry 3 litres minimum of water: They had to carry a dummy rifle. were expected to finish the course within 8 hours and 48 minutes_ Four different routes were allocated to soldiers red, black, green and orange_ Black and red routes started from checkpoint 1 going in opposite directions and green and orange from checkpoint 4 going in opposite directions. Water was available at checkpoints (CP) 1, 4 and 5 _ CP's with vehicle access_ The distances between check points where water was not available were CPA 3 _ 5 was 12.67km, CP 4 ~ 2 - 1 was 9.8km: Weather forecast for the was available at the control room at the camp. The met office forecast was a Wet bulb globe temperature (WBGT) of 25 and max speed of 1Oknots. Many news agencies were reporting that it was forecast to be the hottest of the year with temperatures predicted to reach 27 degrees_ Further WBGT tests were done at 08.00, 12.00 and 16.00 at Sennybridge camp: The result at 12.00 on 13/07/13 was 31.2 There was no WBGT equipment on day-The July five They They day day the march and this result was never asked for nor communicated to the hills. All soldiers were issued with a GPS tracker device kept in the section of their bergans. The Iocation of the trackers could be monitored on computer screens within a control vehicle manned by Signals Regiment staff based at checkpoint 1A, 1B and 1C. The tracker refreshed every 10 minutes on the control screen: Neither the slow man nor the static functions were enabled, Tracker devices are equipped with an emergency button which if pressed would activate a signal to the control vehicle_ Candidates set off at two minute intervals from the checkpoints with Roberts and Maher setting off on the black route and Dunsby on the red route. Maher set of at 06.46 Black route 4 Roberts set off at 06.56 Black route 9 Dunsby set off at 06.52 Red route 7 Checkpoint procedure was for candidates to approach and within 10 to 15 yards to drop to one knee with map and compass in hand. Each candidate was then called forward by the directing staff manning the checkpoints and asked for his call sign and route number and where he has just come from and he will then be given the coordinates for the next checkpoint and will show the directing staff where he is going on the map If the directing staff were the candidate would continue. The means to withdraw were voluntary withdrawal which meant the soldier could not have a further go at selection, medical withdrawal the solider could have another go at test week, training officer withdrawal the soldier may have another go at test week depending on the reason for withdrawal: During the there were a number of heat related casualties_ Soldier 2J medically withdrew at CP4 at 12.14pm with heat illness and Soldier 2P medically withdrew at CP1 at 12.46pm with heat illness, 1W assessed at CP4 for heat illness at 12.22 but was allowed to continue. Soldier 4E medically withdrew at 14.26 with heat illness 1W was identified as slow to progress at 15.45 and directing staff went to him from CPZ. He was assisted down the mountain and found to be suffering from heat illness. He was hospitalised. 1X had his man down alarm triggered at 16.55. He was evacuated by air ambulance to hospital. 2D made it to the finish but later collapsed at camp and had to insist that he was taken to hospital where he was diagnosed with acute kidney injury due to heat illness. 4G was an unidentified heat illness casualty he finished the course but was unwell afterwards though he did not seek medical assistance. The chronology for each solider is set out in the attached record of inquest top happy; day
Action should be taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe you and your organisations have the power to take such action.

Similar PFD reports

Shared signals

Related inquiry recommendations

Similar themes

Report details

Reference
2015-0228
Date of report
20 July 2015
Coroner
Louise Hunt
Coroner area
Birmingham & Solihull

Responses identified

Responses identified 1 of 2
1 response not yet linked

Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 15 Sep 2015.

Sent to

Special Forces
Defence

Source links