Source · Prevention of Future Deaths

Ethan Johnson

Ref: 2015-0393 Date: 29 Sep 2015 Coroner: Thomas Osborne Area: Milton Keynes Responses identified: 1 / 1 View PDF

There was a critical lack of leadership and support for junior staff managing an abnormal CTG trace, compounded by a hierarchical system preventing timely consultant attendance.

Date 29 Sep 2015
56-day deadline 24 Nov 2015
Responses identified 1 of 1
Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths

Coroner's concerns

AI summary
There was a critical lack of leadership and support for junior staff managing an abnormal CTG trace, compounded by a hierarchical system preventing timely consultant attendance.
View full coroner's concerns
Tel 01908 254326 | Fax 01908 253636 (1)That the most junior member of staff (midwife) was left to look after even though the CTG trace was deemed abnormal. The midwife felt unsupported.

(2) Two further members of staff reviewed the CTG trace and yet it appears that no one was in a position of leadership to require a doctor to attend and review the trace and (3)When the consultant on call was requested to attend he indicated that he would do so later. No one on the unit had the leadership role to insist upon his attendance.

(4) No one on duty in the unit was able to assume the leadership role and be in a position to offer advice, support and to direct the course of events.

(5) There appeared to be a lack of understanding by members of staff as to labour ward management because of the lack of effective leadership.

(6) There still appears to be a hierarchical approach to escalation of care within the unit.

Tel 01908 254326 | Fax 01908 253636

Responses

1 respondent
Milton Keynes University Hospitals NHS NHS / Health Body
29 Sep 2015 PDF
Action Taken

The Trust has strengthened the preceptorship period for newly qualified midwives, implemented 2-hourly 'intentional rounding' by a Band 7 Coordinator, and implemented a daily 'safety huddle' on the delivery suite. (AI summary)

View full response
Dear Mr Osborne Re REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS Thank you for your letter of 29th September 2015, raising concerns following the Inquest into the death of Ethan Johnson. The Trust is always willing and eager to develop and make changes to improve the care it provides to the Iocal population and has considered the matters you raise and responds as follows:
1. That the most junior member of staff (midwife) was left to look afters even though the CTG trace was deemed abnormal. The midwife felt unsupported. In this particular case the concerns were identified and appropriately escalated within a minutes_ All our junior midwives are fully qualified and are conversant with the escalation process and how to summon help in an emergency. All staff have been reminded of this process. In response to your concern, however; the new Head of Midwifery has strengthened the preceptorship period for newly qualified midwives. This means that are supernumerary for several weeks and will be supported by experienced senior practice development midwives, whilst being familiarised in departmental processes Furthermore, 2 hourly 'intentional rounding' of all patients undergoing 1:1 care (antenatal, labour, and postnatal) by a Band Co-ordinator is now in place to ensure that appropriate care is being given through support of the patient's individual midwife_ In addition, 'safety huddle' been implemented. This is a meeting at the delivery suite whiteboard, consisting of the Labour Ward coordinator and medical teams, including the Consultant: This ensures that all staff are aware of each patient's clinical status and their As a teaching hospital, we conduct oducation and research to improve healthcare for WeCARE our patients. During your visit students may be involved in yaur care; or yDu may be Chief Executive: Joe Harrison asked to participate in clinical trial. Please speak l0 your doctor or nurse you have Chainan: Baroness Wall of New Bamet any concems_ Way Keynes few they has

management plan. The department is also in the process of changing the existing patient whiteboard, to include time of doctor review in cases where the CTG trace is deemed suspicious
2. Two further members of staff reviewed the CTG trace and it appears that no one was in & position of leadership to require a doctor to attend and review the trace and On the ward the CTG did not require immediate intervention, SO when the doctor had not attended within a reasonable timescale it was escalated appropriately- We have written to every member of staff clarifying their responsibilities if asked to review a patient; as well as what to do if senior help has been unable to attend. This includes timescales for upward escalation 'Fresh eyeslears' stickers have been introduced to ensure hourly senior review of both intermittent and continuous fetal monitoring: Central Electronic Fetal Monitoring has now been installed and an internationally renowned expert on fetal monitoring has delivered training in the Trust_
3. When the consultant on call was requested t0 attend he indicated that he would do so later. No one on the unit had the leadership role to insist upon attendance_ The Consultant attended delivery suite within 14 minutes of being called, This is an appropriate time for the case for which he was called (i.e. not A new, specifically dedicated Matron for Labour Ward has ensured that a revised handover communication tool (SBAR) is embedded in practice, so that a succinct common language is in place to enable the medical staff to make an appropriate assessment of when to attend: There is now a Manager of the on the Maternity Unit; No one on duty in the unit was able to assume the leadership role and be in & position to offer advice, support and to direct the course of events larrived on delivery suite at 13.10 hours, monitoring was commenced at 13.13 hours, and concerns hecame apparent with the acute fetal bradycardia (low heart rate) at
13.25 hours wher Consultant) was already on delivery suite managing a separate_maternal emergency_ At this point he directed Ythe Registrar) to deal with in the first instance and the appropriate management plan was carried out by taking her immediately to theatre to expedite delivery of the baby_ Thereforel appropriately directed Ito deal with one problem whilst he dealt with the other. is an experienced obstetrician , and the difficulties encountered during the procedure (caesarean section) could not have been predicted. yet they are his Day

5. There appeared to be a lack of understanding by members of staff as to Labour Ward management because of the lack of effective leadership_ We notel concerns about the apparent chaotic situation; however , the situation had changed from needing routine intervention, to the recognition that an extreme emergency had developed, requiring the baby to be delivered within 30 minutes Our staff practice emergency scenarios such as this on a regular basis where each member of the multidisciplinary team has a clearly designated role, but in this case the unexpected difficulties encountered at delivery of Ethan Johnson could not have been foreseen. We fully acknowledge that we should have de-briefed Iso that this situation could have been clarified.
6. There still appears to be a hierarchical approach to escalation of care within the unit: There are existing clear instructions for all midwifery staff; from new Band 5 Midwife to Matron level and also for all levels of medical staff in respect of escalation to a Consultant Please see copy of written policy which has been recirculated to all staff. Joint leadership training for Senior Midwives and Consultants will be undertaken in January 2016 which will further strengthen multidisciplinary team-working_ We are also currently reviewing of role of our Consultant Midwife in terms of supporting clinical leadership on Labour Ward. We trust that this addresses your concerns. Should you wish the Trust to provide any further information in respect of this issue, please contact me_

Report sections

Investigation and inquest
On 06/01/2015 I commenced an investigation into the death of Ethan Robert Johnson. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 15th September 2015. The conclusion of the inquest was Narrative as follows: The deceased was born on 4th January 2015 at 13.46. Prior to his delivery he suffered perinatal asphyxia and meconium aspiration. The problem with his wellbeing were first identified by an abnormal CTG at 12.15 and the delay in his subsequent delivery by caesarean section resulted in a lost opportunity to deliver him earlier and render further medical treatment. His cause of death was given after a post-mortem examination as 1a) Meconium Aspiration 1b) Perinatal Asphyxia
Circumstances of the death
Ethan Johnson was a new born baby. His Mother was admitted to the Maternity Unit for induction of labour at 40+11 weeks.

Mum informed midwife on admission that there had not been foetal movements felt since 9pm the night before admission but said that this was her normal pattern of movements. CTG on admission showed a non-reactive trace. Mum spontaneously ruptured membranes and thick meconium was noted. Mum was transferred to Delivery Suite and repeat CTG was deemed pathological. A Category One (Urgent) Caesarean Section was performed under general anaesthetic. There was some difficulty during the delivery and Ethan was born at 1.46pm with no respiratory effort, no heart rate and was floppy and pale. Resuscitation was commenced immediately, his airway was inspected under direct vision by SHO and copious amount of thick meconium aspirated from beneath vocal cords. Resuscitation was carried out and a heart rate was first detected at 35 minutes of age. Ethan was transferred to the Neonatal Unit at 2.44pm. He was still undergoing various treatments and was discussed with a tertiary Neonatal Consultant at the John Radcliffe Hospital. He felt that the situation and outlook was extremely poor and advised discussing withdrawal of intensive care with the parents. A discussion was held with both parents at around 4pm and the decision was made to withdraw treatment. Ethan was extubated at 11.30pm and his death was confirmed at 3.26am on 05/01/2015.
Copies sent to
Local Safeguarding Children BoardCare Quality Commission
Inquest conclusion
The deceased was born on 4th January 2015 at 13.46. Prior to his delivery he suffered perinatal asphyxia and meconium aspiration. The problem with his wellbeing were first identified by an abnormal CTG at 12.15 and the delay in his subsequent delivery by caesarean section resulted in a lost opportunity to deliver him earlier and render further medical treatment. His cause of death was given after a post-mortem examination as 1a) Meconium Aspiration 1b) Perinatal Asphyxia

Similar PFD reports

Shared signals

Related inquiry recommendations

Similar themes

Report details

Reference
2015-0393
Date of report
29 September 2015
Coroner
Thomas Osborne
Coroner area
Milton Keynes

Responses identified

Responses identified 1 of 1
All listed responses identified

Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 24 Nov 2015.

Sent to

Milton Keynes Hospital

Source links