Source · Prevention of Future Deaths

Frank Mellers

Ref: 2015-0464 Date: 17 Nov 2015 Coroner: Zafar Siddique Area: Black Country Responses identified: 1 / 2 View PDF

The report identifies that the patient's DNAR status was fixed without family consultation, poor communication between staff led to resuscitation attempts despite the DNAR, and guidelines for DNAR communication may need examination.

Date 17 Nov 2015
56-day deadline 12 Jan 2016 est.
Responses identified 1 of 2
Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths

Coroner's concerns

AI summary
The report identifies that the patient's DNAR status was fixed without family consultation, poor communication between staff led to resuscitation attempts despite the DNAR, and guidelines for DNAR communication may need examination.
View full coroner's concerns
Evidence emerging from the inquest suggested that the patient's DNAR status was fixed without any reference_toldiscussion_with his_family: It is recognised [ILI: PROTECT] The The day that this is a medical decision for the physician but good practice and guidelines require that the family be kept up to date with all such decisions.

(2) There was generally poor communication between nursing and medical staff as evidenced the inquest when a decision was made to attempt resuscitation despite there a DNAR in place_ (3) In light of the inquest findings, you may consider that the guidelines and policy in the issuing and communication of DNAR may need to be examined

Responses

1 respondent
Frank Mellers
8 Jan 2016 PDF
Action Taken

Following a Root Cause Analysis, the importance of ward rounds has been reiterated, a DNAR indicator has been developed on ward boards, the DNAR policy has been reviewed, and a DNAR leaflet has been developed for patients and families. Peer audits are being carried out to review the effectiveness of DNAR forms, and the findings of the inquest have been shared with relevant staff. (AI summary)

View full response
Dear Mr Siddique Re: Frank Mellers deceased Date of Birth: I8t September 1921 Date of Death: 17lh September 2015 Date of Inquest: 17th November 2015 am writing in response to your report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. would like to assure you that as a result of the Inquest findings, Mr Mellers' case was formally reported and investigated as a Serious Incident As an organisation we have formal processes for investigating Serious Incidents_ To this end, a Root Cause Analysis was completed which included a review of the systems in place for maintaining at the time: The learning from both the Inquest and the internal investigation will be shared with staff across the organisation. Summary of Incident Mr Mellers arrived via the Emergency Department on 14"h September 2015 following a mechanical fall at home. As a result of this Iall, Mr Mellers was identified as having sustained a fracture to the left neck of femur for which he underwent a hemi-arthroplasty procedure. operatively; & Do Not Attempt Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation (DNAR) document had been completed and discussed with Mr Mellers following concerns raised about the effect anesthesia during surgery would have: A telephone call was made to Mr Mellers' Grand Daughter to inform her of the risks associated with the surgery: Mr Mellers surgery was carried out on 16 September 2015 and is noted to have progressed well with no immediate concerns noted. Mr Mellers was identified to be recovering well and returned to the ward the same day: Through the night; Mr Mellers is noted to have reducing blood pressure, oxygen saturation and temperature for which interventions were put in place to support him, Mr Mellers is recorded as appearing comfortable and reporting no increase in pain at that time_ On 17 September 2015,a call was made for the cardiac arrest team to attend to Mr Mellers; they did this and were able to regain pulse. However; following this, Mr Mellers experienced a second arrest and decision was made to abandon the resuscitation as the team realised that there was a DNAR in place. Mr Mellers was recorded as dying at 12 20hrs. Cont'd. safety Pre

Page 2 Coroner' $ Concerns During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern: In the Coroners opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken: The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: Evidence emerging from the inquest suggested that the patients DNAR status was fixed without any reference toldiscussion with his family: It is recognised that this is a medical decision for the physician but good practice guidelines require that the family be kept up to date with all such decisions:
2. There was generally poor communication between nursing and medical staff as evidenced during the inquest when a decision was made to attempt resuscitation despite there a DNAR in place: 3 In light of the inquest findings, you may consider that the guidelines and policy in the issuing and communication of DNAR may need to be examined: Action Taken Root Cause Analysis was undertaken following Mr Mellers Inquest and action has been taken with regard to communication with patient's families and between nursing and medical teams about DNAR: The following actions have been taken: We have reiterated the importance of the use of our ward round standard which emphasises the importance of daily ward rounds to be carried out between both staff groups to ensure strong and robust care management: We have developed an indicator on our Ward Boards to ensure that where a patient has a DNAR in place it is highlighted to all staff. The Ward Boards act as a communication tool to allow for fast reference by all staff groups during handovers and during the course of the day: We reviewed our policy to ensure that it is compliant with best practice (including communication) with regard to DNAR: We have developed a leaflet to provide patients and families with information about DNAR (enc) The findings f Mr Mellers Inquest have been shared with relevant stalf, including all Consultants have undertaken over the past several months a series of peer audits throughout a variety of care settings to review the effectiveness with which DNAR forms are being utilised: am pleased to report that during this period we have seen signiticant improvements in the quality, completeness and robustness of the use of DNAR with particular emphasis placed upon ensuring discussions with patients and their families are clear and fully documented about the purpose and potential outcome of a DNAR: We will be carrying out these audits and reviews on a basis to assure that the learning from this incident which we have disseminated across our organisation: Finally, may we take this opportunity to offer our unreserved apologies to Mr Mellers family along with our sincere condolences for their loss:

Report sections

Investigation and inquest
On 23 September 2015, commenced an investigation into the death of Mr Frank Mellers (dob 8/9/21). investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 17 November 2015. conclusion of the inquest was & narrative conclusion: Mr Mellers had a fall at home on the 4 September 2015 and sustained a fractured left hip. He was admitted to Hospital the same and had an operation t0 repair the fracture on the 16 September 2015. Post operatively he initially made good recovery and a do not attempt resuscitation notice (DNAR) was in place prior to surgery. There were a number of occasions of poor communication with the family of the deceased where Iittle or no explanation was given to the family as to his actual DNAR status . In addition he was thought to be not classified as DNAR by nursing staff and CPR was commenced when his condition declined and he suffered a cardiac arrest on the 17 September 2015 He was initially resuscitated and then had a further heart attack and on this second occasion, CPR was not commenced and he died on the 17 September 2015 as a result of congestive cardiac failure, Ischaemic heart disease contributed to by the stress of the necessary operation to repair the fracture. The medical cause of death was 1a) Congestive cardiac failure 1b) Ischaemic heart disease Ic) Post-operative repair of fracture neck of femur.
Circumstances of the death
The circumstances are apparent from the conclusion outlined above
Action should be taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe you have the power to take such action,

Similar PFD reports

Shared signals

Related inquiry recommendations

Similar themes

Report details

Reference
2015-0464
Date of report
17 November 2015
Coroner
Zafar Siddique
Coroner area
Black Country

Responses identified

Responses identified 1 of 2
1 response not yet linked

Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 12 Jan 2016 (estimated).

Sent to

Care Quality Commission (CQC)
Walsall Manor Hospital

Source links