Source · Prevention of Future Deaths

Kevin Gilbert

Date: 14 Dec 2015 Coroner: Rachel Redman Area: Kent (Central and South East) Responses identified: 0 / 1 View PDF

There was confusion and unreasonable delay in transferring an acute aortic dissection patient to a tertiary center, including a failure to escalate the transfer decision to a consultant.

Date 14 Dec 2015
56-day deadline 8 Feb 2016 est.
Responses identified 0 of 1
Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths

Coroner's concerns

AI summary
There was confusion and unreasonable delay in transferring an acute aortic dissection patient to a tertiary center, including a failure to escalate the transfer decision to a consultant.
View full coroner's concerns
There appeared to be confusion on the part oi as to the standing protocols at St Thomas' Hospital concerning transfer of patients with a diagnosis of aortic dissection: Given that Mr Gilbert was presenting at William Harvey Hospital as an acute emergency requiring specialist surgery at a tertiary centre and that his diagnosis of suspicion made on presenting clinical symptoms by a Consultant in Accident and Emergency medicine which was confirmed by CT scan, it was not reasonable for to rely on his understanding of the procedure of accepting such patients and wait for the CT imagery before agreeing that he could be transferred, It was not reasonable to declinel request for the decision to accept Mr Gilbert to be escalated to a Consultant on the basis that Iwas in theatre and unable to talk to heard evidence from my independent expert in Cardiothoracic that had Mr Gilbert been transferred to St Thomas' Hospital without delay he may have been in a position to undergo lifesaving surgery: Whilst his blood pressure was low during the 3 hour wait; he was self-ventilating and did not arrest until shortly after 3. Had he arrested at St Thomas' Hospital; the facilities there to perform emergency surgery were more specialist and suitable than at William Harvey Hospital. Mr Gilberts chances of survival would have been greater had the in accepting him for transfer been avoided.

Report sections

Investigation and inquest
On 5th February commenced an Investigation into the death of Kevin John Gilbert Cbreclusestigation concluded at the end of the Inquest onead December 201 Silbet couclusion of the Inquest was that Kevin John Gilbert died as a result of natural causes
Circumstances of the death
Mr Gilbert suffered an aortic root dissection in the of 29.01.15 which diagnosed provisionally on his symptoms and then by confirmatory was after arrivalat the Accident and Emergency Department aortogram soon at William Harvey Hospital by Consultant in Accident and Emergency Medicine. Mr Gilbert was Stabilised and considered to be a suitable patient for transfer to St Thoenas' forrepair ofthe dissection because othis ag8e49 pearansfed [aCt Ofrotevantosevtol medical (mild asthma only) spoke tol previous Cardiothoracic on call SpR in surgery at St Thomas' Hospital atjust after 12.45pm who advised that he would need t0 see the images before he could Mr patienth accept Gilbert as a hhad already asked the Radiology Department to send them to St Thomas' Hospital but it wasn t until 3.4Opm that Dr Cummings confirmed td that he had received them and that Mr Gilbert could be transferred. previous 3 hours_ called Mr Cummings During the of the situation several times to stress the urgency and critical condition of his patient Atone point; he sought to escalate his request and asked to speak to Mr Cummings' Consultant; Mr Avlonitis, be told that he was in surgery and unavailable . to Mr Gilbert left William Harvey Hospital shortly after 3.4Opm in an ambulance for road journey to St Thomas' Hospital. At 3.54pm he returned to William the Hospital as he had arrested shortly after departure. AlI Harvey attempts were made to sesscitate him including pericardiocentesis and resuscitative thoracotomy but without success. His death was confirmed at 4.25pm: The cause of Mr Gilbert's death was:- 1a Acute haemopericardium 1b Aortic dissection. morning history radiology the
Action should be taken
That all clinicians at St Thomas' Hospital who are involved in decisions to accept the transfer ofpatients to their hospital are familiar with its procedures_ pn 30.01.15 expressing his concern that the in Mr Gilbert's transfer may have contributed to his death and suggesting that alternative methods to the image transfer system eg telemedicine or a similar direct patient review system are implemented. This prompted an e mail from] all Registrars in the Cardiothoracic Surgery department dated 24" February 2015 referring to the possibility of confusion on their part regarding the process of accepting dissection referrals He confirmed that such referrals must be discussed immediately with the on-call Consultant and that there is no departmental policy to transfer the CT scan for viewing before a decision for patient transfer is made: If it is necessary to view the CT imagery in the firstplace, that decision should only be made by a Consultant (Consultant Cardiothoracic Surgeon gave evidence ing absence at the Inquest and confirmed that a Consultant must be informed by his junior staff of the request for emergency admission: Whilst it appeared that an e mail had been circulated to the Registrars by lafter Mr Gilbert's death, and receipt of letter request that all appropriate action is taken to ensure that junior clinical Surgery, 4Opm: delay delay staff are aware of the requirement that such emergencies requiring admission are discussed in the first instance with the Consultant: If it is deemed within your hospital that an e mail to this effect is sufficient; then it would seem that appropriate action has already been taken by the hospital.

Similar PFD reports

Shared signals

Related inquiry recommendations

Similar themes

Report details

Date of report
14 December 2015
Coroner
Rachel Redman
Coroner area
Kent (Central and South East)

Responses identified

Responses identified 0 of 1
1 response not yet linked

Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 8 Feb 2016 (estimated).

Sent to

St Thomas' Hospital

Source links