Source · Prevention of Future Deaths
Robert Dearing
Ref: 2016-0311
Date: 30 Aug 2016
Coroner: Paul Smith
Area: Lincolnshire (Central)
Responses identified: 0 / 1
View PDF
Unregulated, non-standard anti-glare visors significantly obscured driver vision due to extremely low light transmission. A lack of legislation and British Standard certification for these devices poses a safety risk.
Date
30 Aug 2016
56-day deadline
28 Oct 2016
Responses identified
0 of 1
Coroner's concerns
Unregulated, non-standard anti-glare visors significantly obscured driver vision due to extremely low light transmission. A lack of legislation and British Standard certification for these devices poses a safety risk.
View full coroner's concerns
_ received evidence that an examination of the motor car involved in this collision revealed that at the time of the collision it was fitted with a non-standard 'Sunblaster" anti-glare sun visor which had been clipped onto the standard internal fitted visor . The additional visor measured approximately 3Ocm X 1Ocm when folded. It was of bi-fold design, which allowed it to be opened down, to measure 30cm x 2Ocm_ It was possible for the visor to be used with either one, or both sections of the visor in use, ie either single or double thickness (II) At the time of the collision the driver had been the visor folded, so that it was used in "double thickness mode (IV) received evidence that whilst there is specific legislation governing the light transmission qualities of vehicle windscreen glass, that the legislation does not currently extend to such devices, which are unregulated. received evidence that there is currently no British Standard certification for such items_ I received evidence that there was a legal requirement that the vehicle windscreen should have a Visual Light Transmission (VLT) reading of not less than 75%. (Vi) received evidence that an analysis of the anti-glare visor demonstrated that if used in single thickness mode, it had a VLT of between 17.5% and 22.1%. When used in double thickness mode, as in this case, the VLT readings were greatly reduced, to between 3.9% and 4.2%_ (VII) received evidence that such results could be considered dangerous in that the driver's vision of the road ahead may be considerably obscured. In addition received evidence that;, if used in single mode, the fold line between the two sections may fall across the driver's eye-line and present a further impediment to the driver's field of view
Report sections
Investigation and inquest
On 13 July 2015 commenced an investigation into the death of Robert Arnold Dearing, aged 49 The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 21 July 2016. conclusion of the inquest was that Mr Dearing died as a result of a road traffic collision, the medical cause of death being: 1a. Head Injury
Circumstances of the death
On the 3rd 2015 at approximately 08.10am Mr Dearing was his pedal cycle along the C420 road, known locally as Sand Lane, Barkston, Grantham Lincolnshire_ He had almost reached the Sand Lane Railway Bridge, which carries the railway line across Sand Lane, the road passing under the bridge for a distance of approximately 20 metres_ The weather was bright and sunny, the sun ahead of Mr Dearing, and slightly to his left hand side. The immediate approach to the bridge had substantial hedges and mature trees which overhung the carriageway, causing substantial shadows The area of the road beneath the bridge was in deep shadow
5. Mr Dearing was wearing dark coloured clothing: Mr Dearing was struck from the rear by a motor car driven in the same direction of travel. The driver failed to see Mr Dearing prior to impact: received evidence that the driver offered by way of explanation for her failure to see Mr Dearing, that she had been distracted by the sun shining between her rear view mirror and sun visor, and also that he had been hidden in the shadows which were accentuated by the sudden change from bright sunlight to deep shade. At the time of the collision the driver was using a non-standard anti-glare visor fitted to the internal visor The July riding being being
5. Mr Dearing was wearing dark coloured clothing: Mr Dearing was struck from the rear by a motor car driven in the same direction of travel. The driver failed to see Mr Dearing prior to impact: received evidence that the driver offered by way of explanation for her failure to see Mr Dearing, that she had been distracted by the sun shining between her rear view mirror and sun visor, and also that he had been hidden in the shadows which were accentuated by the sudden change from bright sunlight to deep shade. At the time of the collision the driver was using a non-standard anti-glare visor fitted to the internal visor The July riding being being
Action should be taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe you ANDIOR your organisation have the power to take such action.
Similar PFD reports
Related inquiry recommendations
Manchester Arena Inquiry
Mandatory Ambulance Liaison Officer at events
COVID-19 Inquiry
Independent Statutory Resilience Body
COVID-19 Inquiry
Improved Risk Assessment Approach
COVID-19 Inquiry
Triennial Pandemic Exercises
COVID-19 Inquiry
Publish Exercise Reports and Lessons
Post Office Horizon Inquiry
Apply best offer principle equally in GLOS
Post Office Horizon Inquiry
Post Office to engage in negotiations during HSSA appeal period
Post Office Horizon Inquiry
Set deadline for HSS claims with guidance on late applications
Post Office Horizon Inquiry
Clarify whether HCRS and OCS assessment processes differ
Post Office Horizon Inquiry
Establish standing public body to administer future redress schemes
Report details
- Reference
- 2016-0311
- Date of report
- 30 August 2016
- Coroner
- Paul Smith
- Coroner area
- Lincolnshire (Central)
Responses identified
Responses identified
0 of 1
1 response not yet linked
Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 28 Oct 2016.
Sent to
- Department for Transport