Source · Prevention of Future Deaths
William Bergman
Ref: 2017-0343
Date: 31 Oct 2017
Coroner: ME Hassell
Area: London Inner (North)
Responses identified: 0 / 1
View PDF
A staff nurse prematurely dismissed a head injury as minor, failing to conduct vital observations or seek medical review for an elderly patient. This raises concerns that other healthcare professionals may similarly underestimate the severity of head injuries.
Date
31 Oct 2017
56-day deadline
1 Apr 2018 est.
Responses identified
0 of 1
Coroner's concerns
A staff nurse prematurely dismissed a head injury as minor, failing to conduct vital observations or seek medical review for an elderly patient. This raises concerns that other healthcare professionals may similarly underestimate the severity of head injuries.
View full coroner's concerns
The staff nurse who was called to see Mr Bergman after the accident, quickly formed the opinion that he was fine.
Although the medical records were not available for consideration because Barts Health has been unable to locate them, she said that she would not go into detail such as whether he felt sick.
She did not ask for immediate general observations, then to be repeated. She did not ask for immediate neurological observations, then to be repeated. She did not ask for a medical review.
She said very candidly that she did not consider the possibility of a minor head injury in an elderly person with vascular dementia and liver cirrhosis having the potential for a major consequence.
When she noted a bruise (which a family member attending Mr Bergman that day described as being accompanied by a lump) some hours later, she did not change her management plan.
She completed a Datix report only the following day, after Mr Bergman’s death.
The staff nurse said in court how sorry she was that she had not acted differently, and described her contact with Mr Bergman as career changing.
The reason I write to you now is because if one staff nurse responded in this way to a head injury, immediately assuming that it was minor and therefore with minor consequences, then others may behave in the same way.
Although the medical records were not available for consideration because Barts Health has been unable to locate them, she said that she would not go into detail such as whether he felt sick.
She did not ask for immediate general observations, then to be repeated. She did not ask for immediate neurological observations, then to be repeated. She did not ask for a medical review.
She said very candidly that she did not consider the possibility of a minor head injury in an elderly person with vascular dementia and liver cirrhosis having the potential for a major consequence.
When she noted a bruise (which a family member attending Mr Bergman that day described as being accompanied by a lump) some hours later, she did not change her management plan.
She completed a Datix report only the following day, after Mr Bergman’s death.
The staff nurse said in court how sorry she was that she had not acted differently, and described her contact with Mr Bergman as career changing.
The reason I write to you now is because if one staff nurse responded in this way to a head injury, immediately assuming that it was minor and therefore with minor consequences, then others may behave in the same way.
Report sections
Investigation and inquest
On 29 December 2016, one of my assistant coroners, Sarah Bourke, commenced an investigation into the death of William Bergman, aged 88 years. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest earlier today. The jury made a narrative determination, which I attach.
Circumstances of the death
Mr Bergman, who suffered with vascular dementia, was admitted to the Royal London Hospital and diagnosed with pneumonia. He died following an impact to his forehead sustained while healthcare assistants were changing him on 19 December 2016, variously described as hitting it on the cot side or on the side of the nearby television. His deterioration was noted several hours after the incident, and when he was then scanned, he was found to have sustained a subdural haematoma and a massive intracranial bleed.
Copies sent to
Care Quality Commission for England
Similar PFD reports
Related inquiry recommendations
Scottish Hospitals Inquiry
Training for IPC professionals engineers and clinicians
Scottish Hospitals Inquiry
IPC role specifications and staffing levels
Southport Inquiry
Autism spectrum disorder police training
Southport Inquiry
Prevent training on online activity assessment
Southport Inquiry
Neurodiversity training for Prevent practitioners
Southport Inquiry
Balancing vulnerability with professional curiosity
Southport Inquiry
Sharing information about closed Prevent referrals
Southport Inquiry
Prevent Supervisor training on closure decisions
Southport Inquiry
Prevent referral training for organisations
Southport Inquiry
Taxi driver duty to report criminal activity
Report details
- Reference
- 2017-0343
- Date of report
- 31 October 2017
- Coroner
- ME Hassell
- Coroner area
- London Inner (North)
Responses identified
Responses identified
0 of 1
1 response not yet linked
Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 1 Apr 2018 (estimated).
Sent to
- Barts Hospital NHS Trust