Source · Prevention of Future Deaths

Philippa Day

Ref: 2021-0043 Date: 12 Feb 2021 Coroner: Gordon Clow Area: Nottingham and Nottinghamshire Responses identified: 2 / 2 View PDF

DWP call handlers lacked training for mentally ill claimants, and brief, inaccurate call records hindered decision-making. The assessment process was inflexible, preventing correction of errors or flexible appointment management.

Date 12 Feb 2021
56-day deadline 12 Apr 2021
Responses identified 2 of 2
Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths Mental Health related deaths Other related deaths

Coroner's concerns

AI summary
DWP call handlers lacked training for mentally ill claimants, and brief, inaccurate call records hindered decision-making. The assessment process was inflexible, preventing correction of errors or flexible appointment management.
View full coroner's concerns
1. Call handlers as the DWP had not received, in their preparatory course prior to commencing work taking calls from claimants, specific training as to how best to interact with persons suffering from mental ill health in such a way as to avoid inadvertently exacerbating the difficulties experienced in progressing claims for benefits by such persons;

2. Records of calls handled were very brief and, at times, inaccurate. The records did not facilitate accurate decision making or enable queries to be dealt with efficiently and without inadvertently exacerbating the difficulties experienced by Philippa Day in progressing her benefits claims; and

3. The change of assessment process did not allow for a decision, which was incorrect, to be rectified without evidence of a subsequent change of circumstances. In addition, when a change of review process was appropriate, there was no means by which upcoming appointments could be cancelled without causing prejudice to Philippa Day. A misleading letter was sent which led Philippa Day to consider that her benefits would be stopped if she did not attend the upcoming appointment.

Responses

2 respondents
Department for Work and Pensions Central Government
12 Apr 2021 PDF
Action Taken

The DWP has already introduced a highly visible "watermark" in the PIP computer system showing if a customer has additional support needs. Script changes to better support vulnerable claimants will go live by the end of May 2021, and strengthened wording regarding DLA will be introduced by early May 2021. (AI summary)

View full response
Dear Mr Clow,

RESPONSE TO REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS

Introduction

This is the Department for Work and Pensions’ (“DWP”) response to HMAC Clow’s Report to Prevent Future Deaths made under Regulation 28 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013 dated 12 February 2021. The report arose from an inquest held between 8 and 20 January 2021 into the death of Philippa Jane Louise Day, who was a Personal Independence Payment (“PIP”) claimant with DWP. I would like to take this opportunity to add my condolences to Philippa Day’s family and acknowledge the tragic nature of this case. I would also like to thank the Coroner for his report. The Report to Prevent Future Deaths covered three matters of concern to the Coroner. This response is structured accordingly. Those matters were:
1. Call handlers as the DWP had not received, in their preparatory course prior to commencing work taking calls from claimants, specific training as to how best to interact with persons suffering from mental ill health in such a way as to avoid inadvertently exacerbating the difficulties experienced in progressing claims for benefits by such persons;
2. Records of calls handled were very brief and, at times, inaccurate. The records did not facilitate accurate decision making or enable queries to be dealt with efficiently and without inadvertently exacerbating the difficulties experienced by Philippa Day in progressing her benefits claims; and
3. The change of assessment process did not allow for a decision, which was incorrect, to be rectified without evidence of a subsequent change of circumstances. In addition, when a change of review process was appropriate, there was no means by which

2

upcoming appointments could be cancelled without causing prejudice to Philippa Day. A misleading letter was sent which led Philippa Day to consider that her benefits would be stopped if she did not attend the upcoming appointment. This response therefore firstly covers action that DWP is taking to increase the level of training relating to mental health conditions that call handlers will undertake before they take their first call from a claimant on their own (i.e. without a more experienced colleague on hand to advise them, a standard approach to initial training in service centres in many organisations in both the private and public sector). It then describes the steps underway to improve record-keeping and note-taking during and after calls. It then reports on changes to the assessment process we are developing in conjunction with the PIP Assessment Providers. Finally, I relate a number of other relevant actions DWP is either taking or has already taken to help mitigate the risk of these circumstances happening again in the future. Capita Business Services Ltd (“Capita”), who deliver parts of the PIP service to claimants on DWP’s behalf, have submitted a separate response where the Report to Prevent Future Deaths touches on matters for which they are responsible. However, the two organisations are working together (and with Independent Assessment Services, “IAS”, who also deliver assessments as part of the PIP system) to address the concerns raised in both the Coroner’s findings on Philippa Day’s death and his subsequent Report to Prevent Future Deaths. Mental health awareness training DWP has taken significant steps to improve its staff’s ability to understand the wide range of mental health issues that benefit claimants may face. It may help if I cover in some detail the training in place before and after this case. In August 2018 DWP began including an existing training module on supporting vulnerable customers to all new entrants joining any of its service delivery teams. This provides a foundation level understanding to colleagues of the kinds of issues people with mental health conditions may face; what constitutes good practice when working with those claimants; and where claimants can be directed to find sources of expert help and support. From July 2019 we began rolling out further training, on mental health, behaviour and relationships. This enables colleagues to recognise the effect of their personal impact on people with mental health conditions, and to respond appropriately to unexpected customer behaviour and identify a claimant’s ability to proceed with a call or a face-to-face meeting. It also helps colleagues identify a claimant’s needs and signpost them to sources of help and support, where appropriate. We recognise the need to treat everyone with empathy and care; especially those with mental health conditions. Because of this, and in response to the Coroner’s concerns, we have amended our training for new entrants. From 1 April 2021 all new entrants handling PIP and Employment Support Allowance (“ESA”; an income-maintenance benefit for people with a disability or health condition that limits their capacity to work or engage in work-related activity) will therefore undertake the mental health, behaviour and relationships training in addition to the “supporting vulnerable customers” training before they handle calls from claimants on their own. We are also arranging for existing colleagues in those roles who have not yet received the training to undertake it by 30 June 2021.

3

Improvements to record-keeping and note-taking I would now like to outline activity that, together with a major change in how DWP approaches decision making in PIP and ESA claims, will go some way towards reducing the risks associated with incomplete or inaccurate note-taking. We issued internal communications to all staff working on PIP and ESA early in March 2021 to reinforce the importance of recording notes on the appropriate computer systems and remind them that all colleagues are required to ensure that notes:
a. are made following all interactions with customers or third parties where an accurate record of it is needed, and
b. are an accurate and factual account of the conversation, including both any action agreed or taken, and the full reasons for decisions made. To ensure a consistent focus on recording accurate notes on the system we are now building the subject into our PIP decision-making “quality assurance checks” and updating the documents that define quality standards for PIP colleagues. Dedicated “quality checkers” within DWP check notes are compliant with those standards; are recorded in a standard format and accurately represent conversations and decisions. Updating these processes requires an IT change, which we have planned. We also plan to add a new section, about recording notes on the PIP computer system, to the instructions that colleagues working on PIP claims use for guidance. We expect both of these actions to be completed by the end of Summer 2021. At the same time we have also strengthened the guidance around note-taking for colleagues who manage ESA claims. We plan to issue two further communications to those colleagues, covering specific aspects of ESA claims, in the next few months. As in PIP, we have set new quality standards around note-taking. Quality checkers will now deem only notes that meet the standards outlined in the best-practice guides to have complied with ESA processes. The changes to quality assurance checks in ESA came into effect from March 2021. In addition, since August 2019 DWP has been rolling out training and new guidance for colleagues working on PIP and ESA claims to promote a new approach to making decisions that considers a wider range of evidence that could be relevant to a claim. This new approach, known as “holistic decision making” involves decision-makers proactively contacting claimants to gather evidence, and spending more time considering all evidence available to them before making a decision. It is now embedded across all teams handling PIP and ESA claims. Holistic decision making by necessity requires more extensive record keeping and note- taking on case files for decision makers to explain their decisions. In turn, that means that notes recorded on claimants’ files that might have been considered acceptable in internal quality assurance checks up to the time of Philippa Day’s PIP application would now result in feedback and appropriate action taken with the colleague involved, ranging from informal coaching conversations to more formal management action where consistent poor performance is identified. The process regarding note-taking in Universal Credit (“UC”) claims has always been slightly different to that used in ESA and PIP. UC is an online-based service, which means a certain

4

amount of written record keeping is built in to it automatically. We encourage claimants to use an online ‘Journal’ to share information with their work coach or case manager via online messages, which are free text in format. Similarly, case managers and work coaches communicate with claimants in the same way. Journal messages remain on a claimant’s UC record for future reference for the duration of the claim, forming a permanent written record of conversations. There would of course be a risk that key information could be lost within the detail of what can be lengthy conversations with a claimant. To guard against this, UC case managers and work coaches can ‘pin’ information shared either via the journal or as the result of a conversation with a claimant (face-to-face or by telephone) that they deem critical. Pinning a note to the claim means it will be flagged to anyone viewing a claimant record as soon as they open that record. Colleagues working on UC claims are trained on the effective use of journal messages and pinned notes effectively, and also on the standard of messaging and note-taking required. Changes to the health assessment process I now turn to the third matter of concern described by the Coroner. DWP is working with Capita and IAS, to ensure a process is put in place that allows assessments to be paused even when an appointment has already been scheduled to allow for the gathering of additional information or changing the type or location of the assessment. The new process ensures that a claimant’s assessment can be paused without affecting that claim while the reason for the pause is addressed. Elements of this change have already been implemented with the full process, including the IT elements, being implemented across the whole of the PIP assessment service by the end of September 2021. This process will be supported by new letter templates to be used in correspondence between the PIP Assessment Provider (i.e. Capita or IAS) and the claimant, which DWP will review before approving. These will ensure clear communication around the reason for the pause; confirming any steps that are being taken; and reassuring claimants that their claim will not be affected during this pause. Letter templates will be clear and easy to understand, adhering to existing guidelines for writing in plain English in Government communications. Other action Finally, I would like to update you on additional steps taken by DWP in response to concerns raised throughout the inquest that we committed to addressing at the time. These include:
a. We have amended the script that call handlers use in new PIP claims, strengthening wording around additional support to clearly identify claimants with vulnerabilities such as mental health conditions, as well as those who have difficulties communicating with DWP and who therefore may need additional support to manage their claim. We have also strengthened guidance for DWP case managers who may speak to claimants after the initial application has been completed, aiming to give them greater confidence when considering when they may need to apply an additional support marker to a claimant’s records and when it may be needed. We have improved training to help call handlers better identify those who may need that support.

5

In developing the script changes we have worked with behavioural science experts in DWP to maximise the effectiveness of the wording. We have sought feedback from front-line call handlers and, via DWP’s Operational Stakeholder Engagement Forum, external stakeholder organisations. These changes require changes to the PIP IT system to implement them and they will be live by the end of May 2021.
b. We have strengthened the wording in the PIP application script when Disability Living Allowance (“DLA”, a benefit for people with long-term disabilities and health conditions, which PIP is replacing for working age people) claimants start a PIP application. The revised wording warns them that their DLA will stop in most cases if they do not return their “PIP2” form (the questionnaire that claimants complete setting out their ability to undertake daily living and mobility activities in PIP). The new wording will be introduced by early May 2021.
c. We enhanced the PIP computer system in February 2021 by introducing a highly visible “watermark”, prominently displayed on the first page that appears when accessing a customer’s records, showing if the customer currently holds, or has previously had, Additional Support Indicated or Additional Support Determined markers on their records to indicate to any PIP colleague dealing with the customer that they have, or have previously had, additional support needs. DWP is determined to learn from this deeply tragic case and takes the Coroner’s concerns very seriously. We are constantly reviewing the service we provide to claimants across all DWP services and are committed to improving them for all our customers and especially the many vulnerable people who receive benefits like PIP to help them manage the effects of health conditions and disabilities on their daily lives.
Capita Private Sector
12 Apr 2021 PDF
Action Planned

Capita is pausing the issue of appointment letters during Change of Assessment or Further Review periods. They are also working with DWP to review the tone and language in written communications. Full implementation of the changes will be in place by 30 September 2021. (AI summary)

View full response
Dear Mr Clow,

Regulation 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS Philippa Jane Louise Day (died 16 October 2019)

On behalf of Capita, I would like to say how very sorry we are for the mistakes we made in processing Philippa’s Personal Independence Payment claim and the additional stress this caused her. We have conveyed our apologies and condolences to Philippa’s family and offered to meet them to explain the improvements we have already made and will be making to how we deliver our Personal Independence Payment service. In partnership with the Department for Work and Pensions, we have very carefully considered the issues raised in your Findings of Fact, Conclusion and Prevention of Future Deaths Report of 27 January 2021.

We strive at all times to ensure that we safely deliver our services for the benefit of members of the public. It is a source of profound regret that we made mistakes in this case. We are determined to learn from these mistakes.

On 12 February 2021, you issued a Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths (the Report). Paragraphs 1 and 2 of the Matters of Concern in the Report were addressed to the Department for Work and Pensions. We understand the Department for Work and Pensions will be responding to those paragraphs and separately addressing paragraph 3 of the Matters of Concern.

We respond below to paragraph 3 of the Matters of Concern. We have divided paragraph 3 into three separate sections and explained the steps we are now taking to address the concerns expressed in each section.

Paragraph 3 of the Matters of Concern states the following:

The change of assessment process did not allow for a decision, which was incorrect, to be rectified without evidence of a subsequent change of circumstances. In addition, when a change of review process was appropriate, there was no means by which upcoming appointments could be cancelled without causing prejudice to Philippa Day. A misleading letter was sent which led Philippa Day to consider that her benefits would be stopped if she did not attend the upcoming appointment.

Capita Business Services Limited Registered office: 65 Gresham Street, London, EC2V 7NQ Registered in: England Company No. 02299747

Section 1 of Paragraph 3 “The change of assessment process did not allow for a decision, which was incorrect, to be rectified without evidence of a subsequent change of circumstances”. When a case is referred to Capita by the Department for Work and Pensions for assessment, an Initial Review is undertaken by one of our Disability Assessors. Our Disability Assessors are all trained and qualified health professionals (nurses, physiotherapists, paramedics or occupational therapists) with at least two years’ experience. They are required to select the most appropriate and safest assessment route for assessing a Claimant. This may result in a paper-based review or a face-to-face assessment which could be completed in a clinic or at home (and now, following changes made to our processes due to the current pandemic, by telephone). Review of the Initial Assessment Route Decision Currently, once the Initial Review decision has been communicated to the Claimant, the outcome of the Review may only be reconsidered if either new evidence is made available to Capita, or a health professional involved in the Claimant’s care notifies us that the setting chosen at Initial Review is not appropriate. Capita will now amend its processes so that any change of assessment request made by Claimants or their representatives will be reviewed by one of our Disability Assessors within 3 working days of the request, whether or not new evidence is provided (the Change of Assessment Review). The Change of Assessment Review will check the decision that was made by the original Disability Assessor at the Initial Review and, if appropriate, select a different assessment route. To improve objectivity and prevent unintentional bias, the Change of Assessment Review will be undertaken by a different Disability Assessor to the one who completed the Initial Review. The second Disability Assessor will be able to contact the Claimant and the Claimant’s representatives for further information, if required. In addition, the process will be amended so that on receipt of a change of assessment request, the Personal Independence Payment claim will be paused to allow for the Change of Assessment Review. Within 24 hours of a change of assessment request a Capita employee will contact the Claimant:
- Notifying them of the pause in the process and that a Change of Assessment Review will be undertaken;
- Confirming that the Change of Assessment Review will not prejudice their claim but will pause the processing of it while the Review is being undertaken; and
- Asking how they would like to be informed of the outcome of the Change of Assessment Review.

We will suspend any further appointment letters being sent to the Claimant during the period of the Change of Assessment Review. In agreement with the Department for Work and Pensions, the pausing of the case during the Change of Assessment Review will be recorded in our system and will have no detrimental impact for the Claimant. While the processing of the Claimant’s claim will be paused during the period of the Review, the Department for Work and Pensions will backdate any award to the date of the original claim and existing Claimants should continue to be in receipt of current disability benefits.

Capita Business Services Limited Registered office: 65 Gresham Street, London, EC2V 7NQ Registered in: England Company No. 02299747

A Capita employee will notify the Claimant of the outcome of the Change of Assessment Review within 24 hours of its completion regardless of whether the original Initial Review decision has been changed. Further Review following the Change of Assessment Review After being notified of the outcome of the Change of Assessment Review, the Claimant will be offered two options:
1. To accept the outcome of the Change of Assessment Review - unless the Claimant wishes to challenge their assessment route, following the Change of Assessment Review, they will be informed that their application will proceed under the assessment route determined by such review.

2. To seek a Further Review - if the Claimant wishes to challenge the assessment route, determined by the Change of Assessment Review, they will be invited by a Capita employee to provide further evidence as to why they believe the assessment route should be changed. If further evidence is provided, Capita will undertake a further review of the assessment route (Further Review). Any further evidence must be provided to Capita within 15 working days of notifying the Claimant of the outcome of their Change of Assessment Review. The claim process will remain paused during this period. We will provide clear guidance to the Claimant on:
- The type of evidence that would be considered relevant;
- That Capita will accept verbal evidence from a third party or written evidence; and
- How, where and when the evidence needs to be provided. The Claimant will also be informed by the Capita employee that a Further Review will lead to a pause in the processing of their claim for the period of the Further Review. We will suspend any further appointment letters being sent to the Claimant during the period of the Further Review. In agreement with the Department for Work and Pensions, the pausing of the case during the Further Review will be recorded in our system and will have no detrimental impact for the Claimant. While the processing of the Claimant’s claim will be paused during the period of the Further Review, the Department for Work and Pensions will backdate any award to the date of the original claim and existing Claimants should continue to be in receipt of current disability benefits. If new evidence is provided, this will be recorded on our system and the case will be passed to one of Capita’s Disability Assessors for the Further Review. To improve objectivity and prevent unintentional bias, the Further Review will be undertaken by a different Disability Assessor to those who completed the Initial Review and the Change of Assessment Review. The Disability Assessor conducting the Further Review will contact the Claimant and the Claimant’s representatives for further information, if required. A Capita employee will notify the Claimant of the outcome of the Further Review within 24 hours of its completion regardless of whether the Change of Assessment Review decision has been changed. If no evidence is received within the 15 working days and unless a good reason has been provided for the failure to produce that evidence we will assume the Claimant no longer wishes to challenge their

Capita Business Services Limited Registered office: 65 Gresham Street, London, EC2V 7NQ Registered in: England Company No. 02299747

assessment route. Once this has been confirmed, the Claimant will be informed that their application will now continue to proceed as per the assessment route determined by the Change of Assessment Review. If further evidence comes in after the 15 working day period we may elect to pause the process and undertake a Further Review if appropriate. In other words, the 15 working day period is not an absolute time deadline. However, we would like to avoid unnecessary delays to the consideration of claims for the benefit of our Claimants. Following the outcome of the Further Review, the Claimant will be informed by a Capita employee that their application will proceed under the assessment route determined by such review. Section 2 of Paragraph 3 “In addition, when a change of review process was appropriate, there was no means by which upcoming appointments could be cancelled without causing prejudice to Philippa Day. Currently, the Department for Work and Pensions process entitles the Claimant to cancel their appointment on one occasion without suffering any detriment. In accordance with Capita’s contract with the Department for Work and Pensions, should a Claimant attempt to cancel on a second occasion, they will be informed that they must attend their appointment. If the Claimant does not attend, their case is returned to the Department for Work and Pensions, which then establishes whether there was good cause for the Claimant’s failure to attend. This may result in a delay in the processing of the claim. In agreement with the Department for Work and Pensions, and as outlined above in Section 1, the assessment process will now be paused while Capita undertakes any Change of Assessment Review or Further Review. During this period, any appointments will be cancelled by Capita and will not be classified as a Claimant cancellation. The Claimant will not suffer any detriment as a result of challenging the assessment route as any award will be backdated to the date of the original claim. Section 3 of Paragraph 3 “A misleading letter was sent which led Philippa Day to consider that her benefits would be stopped if she did not attend the upcoming appointment. “ The changes to be made to our systems will prevent the issue of any appointment letters being sent to the Claimant during the period when a Change of Assessment Review or Further Review is being conducted, other than a letter confirming that the assessment process has been paused while the relevant review is conducted. We are also working closely with the Department for Work and Pensions to further review the tone and language used in any written communications with Claimants. This is being done to ensure, not only that they impart clear and important factual information, but also to ensure that they do not cause any unnecessary distress, anxiety or upset to those going through the Personal Independence Payment process. Timings and Progress Capita is already adopting the Change of Assessment and Further Review processes outlined in section 1 above. Full implementation of the remaining improvements require process and system developments, training and contractual amendments which will enable all changes to be in place as soon as possible and by no later than 30 September 2021.

Capita Business Services Limited Registered office: 65 Gresham Street, London, EC2V 7NQ Registered in: England Company No. 02299747

Capita truly cares about the Claimants we support through the Personal Independence Payment process. We are fully committed to learning from this tragedy and to continuously improving how we safely deliver services for the benefit of members of the public.

As noted above, we will also seek to discuss the changes described in this letter with Philippa’s family and our stakeholder groups.

Please do not hesitate to contact me if you require any further clarity or have any queries about any aspects of this letter.

Report sections

Investigation and inquest
On 17 February 2020 I commenced an investigation into the death of Philippa Jane Louise DAY aged
27. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 27 January 2021.

The conclusion of the inquest was a narrative conclusion:-

Despite possessing significant intelligence and ability, Philippa Day was very seriously affected by a range of complex and comorbid mental health conditions. Her primary mental health condition was Emotionally Unstable Personality Disorder which impacted on all areas of her life. Philippa received consistent and professional support from a multi-disciplinary team of mental health professionals who worked effectively together in order to implement a range of appropriate evidence-based interventions in line with applicable national guidance. Despite this treatment, Philippa Day led a notably dysfunctional lifestyle which, but for extensive and consistent support from her family and treating clinicians, would have likely resulted in homelessness and near-constant distress. The support made available to Philippa Day from family and mental health clinicians led to Philippa Day experiencing stable housing, a reduction in risk, a good relationship with her son and a base from which she was able to engage in complex therapeutic interventions which, but for the event which caused her death, would have been likely to result in improvements to her mental health. The following stressors contributed to a decision taken by Philippa, on either the 7th or 8th August 2019, to take an overdose of her prescribed insulin:- a) Her mental health problems and the consequent impact of these upon her family and social relationships; b) Her growing sense of failure as a parent at the point just before her son reached the milestone of starting school; and c) Philippa’s fears that the therapy she was shortly due to commence in earnest would end in failure due to her perception of herself as inadequate and undeserving. Philippa Day was eligible to receive disability benefits. The process of claiming benefits was inevitably going to be stressful for Philippa and the process of claiming Personal Independence Payments, which commenced in November 2018, began from a position of mistrust on the part of

Philippa who was predisposed by her mental health problems to wrongly imagine malign motives on the part of those administering her claim. The administration of Philippa Day’s benefits claim was characterised by multiple errors, some of which occurred repeatedly throughout the period of her claim. As a result of errors made, Philippa Day’s income from benefits more than halved for a period of several months, causing her severe financial hardship. This then resulted in Philippa Day taking out high interest loans creating a financial problem that Philippa Day did not have the means to solve. A decision was made in June 2019 to require Philippa Day to attend an assessment at an assessment centre. No assessment was in fact required in order to determine her claim and there was clear and abundant medical evidence that an assessment outside of the home would exacerbate her mental health against a background of two recent overdoses. The requirement for her to attend this appointment created a risk of a mental health crisis resulting in an overdose. This risk was implicit in the information held in connection with the benefits claim and explicit in advice given to those processing her claim by Philippa Day’s community psychiatric nurse shortly prior to Philippa’s overdose. Although the error in decision making was drawn to the attention of those administering the claim on more than one occasion, it was not rectified as it should have been. The failure to administer the claim in such a way as to avoid exacerbating Philippa Day’s pre-existing mental health problems was the predominant factor, save for her severe mental illness, affecting a decision taken by Philippa Day to take an overdose of her prescribed insulin on the 7th or 8th August 2019. The distress caused by the administration of Philippa Day’s welfare benefits claim led to Philippa Day suffering acute distress and exacerbated many of her other chronic stressors. Were it not for these problems, it is unlikely that Philippa Day would have taken an overdose of her prescribed insulin on 7th or 8th August 2019. In doing so, it was, at the least, Philippa Day’s intention to place her life at risk and to cause herself serious physical harm. It is not possible to determine on the available evidence whether or not it was her intention to thereby end her life. The overdose resulted in Philippa Day suffering hypoglycaemic encephalopathy. She entered a coma from which she was not able to recover and despite all appropriate efforts being made by a team of clinicians over many weeks, Philippa Day’s life could not be saved and she died of her injuries on 16th October 2019.
Circumstances of the death
See box 3 above
Copies sent to
Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust

Similar PFD reports

Shared signals

Related inquiry recommendations

Similar themes

Report details

Reference
2021-0043
Date of report
12 February 2021
Coroner
Gordon Clow
Coroner area
Nottingham and Nottinghamshire

Responses identified

Responses identified 2 of 2
All listed responses identified

Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 12 Apr 2021.

Sent to

Capita
Department for Work and Pensions

Source links