Source · Prevention of Future Deaths

Amelia Barbosa

Ref: 2023-0167 Date: 19 May 2023 Coroner: Samantha Goward Area: Cambridgeshire and Peterborough 1 response identified · 1 indexed addressee View PDF

AI-generated concerns summaryTraining for midwives on correct cord blood sampling techniques was insufficient, potentially leading to inaccurate pH results and false reassurance. There were also gaps in training for neonatal resuscitation, specifically regarding UVC/IO access and the timely provision of blood transfusions.

Date 19 May 2023
56-day deadline 15 Jul 2023 stated in the report
Responses identified 1 of 1
Child Death (from 2015)

Coroner's concerns

AI summary
Training for midwives on correct cord blood sampling techniques was insufficient, potentially leading to inaccurate pH results and false reassurance. There were also gaps in training for neonatal resuscitation, specifically regarding UVC/IO access and the timely provision of blood transfusions.
View full coroner's concerns
1. While I heard evidence that there has been training for Midwives on how to take cord blood, and I was provided with a copy of a poster that was said to have been in use at the Trust for some time, in April 2023, over 2 years after this delivery, the Midwife gave evidence that she and her colleagues were of the opinion that it was appropriate to take a sample from anywhere in the cord, not just in the clamped area. The expert and the Trust’s own Head of Midwifery advised that this was not appropriate. It therefore does not appear that the learning has been passed on to all Trust Midwives and there is a risk that in future cases those treating the baby will be falsely reassured by normal cord pH results which may not be accurate.

2. While I read evidence of some training that had been provided in response to HSIB recommendations for further training on auscultation in addition to saturation monitoring and ECG monitoring during resuscitation, the independent expert also recommended training on UVC and IO access. I am also concerned that there does not appear to have been training in relation to the provision of blood transfusions in such cases to ensure that all potential reversible causes are treated before resuscitation stops. The Head of Midwifery who attended the inquest to advise on issues relating to the recommendations was not in a position to provide evidence on the neonatal position and I have been provided with no evidence by the Trust that these issues have been considered. I am concerned that they require further action.

Responses

1 respondent

North West Anglia NHS Foundation Trust

NHS Trust
Indexed date: 4 Jul 2023 PDF
AI-classified response stance Action Taken
AI-generated response summary

• A poster was produced and issued to clarify that cord blood samples must be taken from the clamped area. • The neonatal resuscitation trolley is now routinely stocked with short intraosseous needles, and the Trust will introduce annual updates for UVC/IO procedures from September. • Paediatricians have accepted a low threshold for giving blood transfusions, preferring a bolus with blood rather than fluids, in line with NLS Guidelines 2021.

View full response
Dear Ms Goward Inquest relating to the death of Amelia BARBOSA I refer to your Regulation 28 Report dated 19th May issued following the inquest. There were two matters of concern which you have asked the Trust to respond to. The first area of concern relates to the taking of cord blood samples by midwifery staff. You heard evidence at the inquest that the midwife in this .case did indeed attempt to take a sample of blood from that part of the umbilical cord which had been clamped. Unfortunately, she was unable to obtain any blood from there and therefore obtained a sample from the unclamped part of the cord. Following the inquest the midwifery department has produced and issued a poster in relation to this. I have enclosed a copy of the poster which makes it clear that cord blood samples must be taken from the clamped area and not from any other part of the cord or placenta. If the midwife is unable to obtain any blood from this part of the cord then they are to inform the Paediatricians in order that they can take a capillary sample. The second area of the concern relates to the attempts to resuscitate after Amelia had been delivered in a very poor condition. An experienced Paediatric Registrar was in charge of the resuscitation until the Consultant Paediatrician arrived. The Registrar was unable to insert an umbilical vein catheter (UVC) in order to administer drugs and fluids. He therefore attempted intraosseous access. However, as only long intraosseous needles were available in theatre there was a delay whilst short intraosseous needles were located. I can confirm that following this incident the neonatal resuscitation trolley is now routinely stocked with short intraosseous needles. As for UVC insertion, this is a technically difficult skill and UVCs are only inserted by Paediatric Registrars and Consultant Paediatricians. Before a

Paediatric Registrar can be signed off they must be able to insert UVCs under observation. However, as the independent expert stated during the inquest, there are occasions when it is simply not technically possible to insert a UVC. Hence the decision in this case to try to gain intraosseous access to give drugs and fluids. I can also confirm that there is regular training for undertaking these procedures on the ATLS (Advance Trauma Life Support) course which clinicians attend every four years. In addition, the Trust will be introducing annual updates for these procedures from September of this year for all doctors involved in looking after neonates. Your report also referred to training in relation to the provision of blood transfusions. Whether a blood transfusion is given during a resuscitation is a matter of clinical judgement for the clinician in charge of resuscitation. However, it has been accepted by our Paediatricians that there should be a low threshold for giving a blood transfusion. In particular, it is preferable to give a bolus with blood rather than fluids. This adopts the NLS (Newborn Life Support) Guidelines from 2021 which recommends this. I hope that our response to your report has provided reassurance to both you and the family that the necessary changes to our practice have been made following Amelia's tragic death. I would also like to take this opportunity on behalf of the Trust to reiterate our deep condolences for Amelia's parents.

Report sections

Investigation and inquest
On 14 October 2021 an investigation in to the death of Amelia Barbosa was commenced. Amelia died on 13 December 2020, aged 7 days. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 17 May 2023. The conclusion of the inquest was: Medical Cause of Death – 1a Hypoxic Ischaemic Encepalopathy, 2 Placental pathologies: acute chorioamnionitis and delayed vilious maturation Conclusion – Died as a result of an acute hypoxic injury in the period immediately before delivery, and which continued during resuscitation, leading to hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy.
Circumstances of the death
1. In summary, Amelia’s mother had a routine pregnancy and was given a due date of 01 December 2020. She attended Peterborough City Hospital at around 1030 hours on 5 December 2020.

2. From very early on, the CTG trace was classified as suspicious on a number of occasions and on some occasions as pathological. Evidence and a report from HSIB confirms that assessment and decision making during this period was appropriate.

3. Due to a failure to progress in the second stage of labour and suspected fetal compromise at around 0240 hours, a decision was made for a Category 2 Caesarean section delivery.

4. The CTG trace was stopped at 0404 hours to enable the Caesarean to take place.
5. As had been anticipated, there was some difficulty due to Amelia’s head being impacted, but the Obstetrician and senior Midwife worked together and this was resolved within 4 minutes.

6. Due to difficulties siting a spinal anaesthetic, and Amelia’s head being impacted, the time from decision to delivery was 83 minutes. Expert evidence confirmed that, on the balance of probabilities, Amelia suffered an acute hypoxic insult commencing around 10 minutes before her delivery and which was ongoing during resuscitation.

7. At delivery, no APGAR scores were recorded as they should have been. However, based upon the evidence in the notes, I accepted the hypothesis from HSIB that it is likely that her scores were 0 at 1 minute and 1 at 5 minutes.

8. The Midwife took cord blood gases but, as there was no blood in the clamped section of the cord, the blood was taken from a different part of the cord. I heard independent expert evidence from a Consultant Neonatologist that these are not likely to have been reliable as they were taken from close to the base of the placenta rather than the clamped section of cord.

9. The evidence of the Midwife at the inquest was that she felt, and she had since discussed this with colleagues who agreed, that if necessary it was fine to take blood from anywhere in the cord. Both the independent expert and the Trust’s own Head of Midwifery, who gave evidence on changes made at the Trust in light of HSIB recommendations, agreed that blood should not be taken from anywhere other than the clamped section of cord. Further, if that was not possible, it must be clearly communicated to the Neonatal/Paediatric team.

10. There were a number of issues identified with the resuscitation and concerns raised by both HSIB and the independent expert, some of which were addressed by the Trust who produced evidence to confirm how these issues had been resolved.

11. However, other issues were identified. One such issue was that the independent expert advised that resuscitation attempts should not have stopped until all reversible causes had been considered and treated. Prior to resuscitation stopping, no blood transfusion had been given. Amelia had been described to be very pale. Her haemoglobin level was later found to be 94. Both the expert and HSIB felt a transfusion should have been given. The treating Registrar also gave evidence that, had he been aware of the issue with the cord blood and another issue relating to the condition of the placenta, he would have given a transfusion. The treating Consultant who gave evidence however disagreed.

12. One of the recommendations from HSIB was for there to be training and feedback to those involved in this case, and others who were not, to learn lessons.

13. There was also difficulty inserting an umbilical venous catheter, which I accept can be difficult even in experienced hands, and the delay in intra osseous access, which was contributed to by the lack of correct equipment on the resus trolley, led to a delay in Amelia receiving adrenaline, fluid volume and sodium bicarbonate. The expert recommended that staff undergo training to improve their skills for obtaining UVC and IO access.

14. While in NICU there was also a delay in Amelia being effectively cooled due to the active cooling machine not working. I was advised that this has now been replaced.

15. Amelia was transferred to Addenbrooke’s Hospital where the extent of her injuries were confirmed and she sadly died on 13 December 2020.

Similar PFD reports

Shared signals

Report details

Reference
2023-0167
Date of report
19 May 2023
Coroner
Samantha Goward
Coroner area
Cambridgeshire and Peterborough

Responses identified

Responses identified 1 of 1
All listed responses identified

Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 15 Jul 2023 (stated in the report).

Sent to

North West Anglia NHS Foundation Trust

Source links