Public Inquiry

Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry

Ongoing · Chair: Sir Wyn Williams · Established June 2021 · Commissioned by Department for Business and Trade

Public inquiry into the Post Office Horizon IT scandal, examining how more than 900 sub-postmasters were wrongly prosecuted based on faulty Fujitsu software between 1999 and 2015.

Where it stands

Public hearings have been held on 242 days, most recently on 17 December 2024.

The inquiry has published 2 reports, most recently Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry: Volume 1 Report on 8 July 2025.

The most recent government response on the record is RESP0000004 - Post Office Limited Letter to Inquiry in response to Recommendation 19., dated 31 October 2025.

Government response (27 recommendations)

Delivery (the addressees’ latest statements)

  • Cabinet Office says completed 14
  • No statement from Department for Business and Trade found in the sources searched 8
  • Cabinet Office says in progress 4
  • Department for Business and Trade says not accepted 1

Record checked against the sources 18 June 2026. Latest activity 5 October 2026.

Latest on the recommendations

All 27 recommendations

Reports

Reports and timeline

Recent milestones

  • Final report Volume 1 published8 July 2025
  • Final Report Expected30 June 2025
  • Hearings conclude17 December 2024
Full timeline

Costs

£83,739,770

Total reported cost to March 2026 Costs in detail

Parliament

35

mentions in Parliament Parliamentary activity

Recommendations

1 shown (filtered)
Clear filters

POH-13: Close HSS Dispute Resolution Procedure when HSSA opens

Not accepted · Department for Business and Trade says not accepted

Recommended

The current Dispute Resolution Procedure in HSS should be closed once all claimants currently within the Procedure have either (a) settled their claims or (b) transferred to HSSA. No claimant who is not in the Dispute Resolution Procedure when HSSA opens should be eligible to join the Dispute Resolution Procedure.

Since then (summary written by this site)

The Inquiry recommended closing the Horizon Shortfall Scheme dispute resolution procedure once appeals open. In October 2025, Blair McDougall, Minister for Small Business and Economic Transformation, stated that the Department for Business and Trade rejected closing the procedure to avoid unfairly restricting postmasters' choices (Blair McDougall, Oct 2025). In March 2026, the Business and Trade Committee HC 1598 acknowledged the refusal without disputing it, while finding that the wider shortfall scheme suffered from operational problems (Business and Trade Committee HC 1598, Mar 2026). The committee reported that thousands of claimants were still awaiting settlement (Business and Trade Committee HC 1598, Mar 2026).

Addressed to Department for Business and Trade · Full record

Reports and timeline

Timeline

Inquiry announced

The Prime Minister committed to an independent inquiry into the Horizon IT system, established on a non-statutory basis.

Source

Prime Minister committed to an inquiry

The Prime Minister committed to an inquiry on 26 February 2020. The Independent Review was established on 10 June 2020.

Source

Non-statutory inquiry announced

Initially non-statutory inquiry established.

Source

Chair appointed

Source

Converted to statutory inquiry

Inquiry converted to statutory public inquiry with power to compel witnesses.

First preliminary hearing

Source

Human impact hearings open

Human impact hearings commenced.

Phase 4 hearings

Source

Show all 15 milestones

Interim report on compensation

Sir Wyn Williams laid before Parliament his first interim report, on the compensation schemes.

Source

Phases 5 and 6 hearings

Source

Phase 7 hearings

Source

Final closing statements

Source

Hearings conclude

Closing statements ended the oral hearings, which ran across Phases 1 to 7 from February 2022.

Source

Final Report Expected

Chair Sir Wyn Williams expected to publish final report.

Source

Final report Volume 1 published

Volume 1 of the final report, on the human impact of the scandal and redress, was laid before Parliament (HC 1119); further volumes remain pending.

Source

Costs

Total reported cost: £83,739,770
Period Total Inquiry legal CP legal Source
Mar 2026 £8,979,208 £5,997,782 £236,637

Financial Report 1 April 2025 - 31 March 2026 (Financial Year 2025-26)

Source and qualifications

Accounting period: 1 Apr 2025 to 31 Mar 2026.

Financial Report 1 April 2025 - 31 March 2026 (Financial Year 2025-26)

Mar 2026 (cum.) £83,739,770 Not reported Not reported

Financial Report 1 April 2025 - 31 March 2026 (cumulative expenditure since Inquiry start, stated in Notes on financial figures)

Source and qualifications
Mar 2025 £25,990,264 £11,319,337 £5,204,208

Financial Report 1 April 2024 - 31 March 2025 (Financial Year 2024-25, updated/re-issued August 2026)

Source and qualifications
Mar 2024 £26,793,005 £12,180,655 £6,150,587

Financial Report 1 April 2023 - 31 March 2024 (Financial Year 2023-24, updated/re-issued August 2026)

Source and qualifications
Mar 2023 £18,491,383 £8,061,912 £3,905,857

Financial Report 1 April 2020 - 31 March 2023 (Financial Year 2022-23)

Source and qualifications

Accounting period: 1 Apr 2022 to 31 Mar 2023.

Financial Report 1 April 2020 - 31 March 2023 (Financial Year 2022-23)

Mar 2022 £3,087,287 £1,265,635 £645,569

Financial Report 1 April 2020 - 31 March 2023 (Financial Year 2021-22)

Source and qualifications

Accounting period: 1 Apr 2021 to 31 Mar 2022.

Financial Report 1 April 2020 - 31 March 2023 (Financial Year 2021-22)

Mar 2021 £360,345 £93,370 Not reported

Financial Report 1 April 2020 - 31 March 2023 (Financial Year 2020-21)

Source and qualifications

Accounting period: 1 Apr 2020 to 31 Mar 2021.

Financial Report 1 April 2020 - 31 March 2023 (Financial Year 2020-21)

1 Apr 2020 – 31 Mar 2026 · Financial Report 1 April 2025 - 31 March 2026 (cumulative expenditure since Inquiry start, stated in Notes on financial figures)

Financial Report 1 April 2025 - 31 March 2026 (cumulative expenditure since Inquiry start, stated in Notes on financial figures)

Source and qualifications
Detailed cost breakdown · to Mar 2026
Inquiry legal costs
£5,997,782
Core participant legal costs
£236,637
Panel remuneration
£515,102
Staff
£962,583
Other
£1,267,104

Parliamentary activity

35 mentions since Sep 2015
2 debates 26 questions

Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry

Written Question House of Commons Dr Al Pinkerton · Liberal Democrat

Asked: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what discussions he has had with the Post Office Horizon Inquiry on the publication of evidence.

Answered by Ministry of Justice: The Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry is a statutory inquiry under the Inquiries Act 2005 and Sir Wyn Williams and the Inquiry team have the right to receive full access to the information and witnesses they require in order to investigate what went wrong at the Post Office. The Inquiry is entirely independent. Within its published terms of reference, Sir …

Fujitsu: Contracts

Written Question House of Commons John Milne · Liberal Democrat

Asked: To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, whether his Department has assessed the suitability of Fujitsu Ltd to continue holding public sector contracts following its role in the Horizon IT system failures.

Answered by Cabinet Office: The impact that the Horizon scandal has had on postmasters and their families is horrendous. This Government is determined to hold those responsible to account. Fujitsu’s culpability needs to be assessed in light of the final report of Sir Wyn Williams’s Inquiry. Once it is published we will carefully consider whether to launch debarment investigations based on the findings in …

Fujitsu: Contracts

Written Question House of Commons John Milne · Liberal Democrat

Asked: To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, how Fujitsu Ltd’s central role in the Horizon IT failures is affecting its eligibility for future government contracts.

Answered by Cabinet Office: The impact that the Horizon scandal has had on postmasters and their families is horrendous. This Government is determined to hold those responsible to account. Fujitsu’s culpability needs to be assessed in light of the final report of Sir Wyn Williams’s Inquiry. Once it is published we will carefully consider whether to launch debarment investigations based on the findings in …

Procurement: Standards

Written Question House of Lords Baroness Ritchie of Downpatrick · Labour

Asked: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the answer by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent on 9 July (HL Deb col 1326), what is the timeline for completing assessments under the Procurement Act 2023 of suppliers who have engaged in poor performance or professional misconduct.

Answered by Cabinet Office: The timeline for completing assessments of suppliers who have engaged in poor performance or professional misconduct is dependent on the circumstances of each individual case. The impact of the Horizon scandal on postmasters and their families has been horrendous. The Government is determined to hold those responsible to account and will continue to seek to make rapid progress on compensation …

Fujitsu: Contracts

Written Question House of Commons Navendu Mishra · Labour

Asked: To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, whether he plans to review Government contracts with Fujitsu.

Answered by Cabinet Office: The impact of the Horizon scandal on postmasters and their families has been horrendous. The Government is determined to hold those responsible to account and will continue to seek to make rapid progress on compensation and redress. Fujitsu’s role in Horizon is one of the issues currently being reviewed by Sir Wyn Williams’s statutory inquiry. The Government are carefully considering …

Fujitsu: Contracts

Written Question House of Lords Baroness Ritchie of Downpatrick · Labour

Asked: To ask His Majesty's Government whether they have assessed Fujitsu for exclusion under the Procurement Act 2023.

Answered by Cabinet Office: The timeline for completing assessments of suppliers who have engaged in poor performance or professional misconduct is dependent on the circumstances of each individual case. The impact of the Horizon scandal on postmasters and their families has been horrendous. The Government is determined to hold those responsible to account and will continue to seek to make rapid progress on compensation …

Fujitsu: Contracts

Written Question House of Lords Baroness Ritchie of Downpatrick · Labour

Asked: To ask His Majesty's Government what is the total value of the 12 contracts issued to Fujitsu in the last 12 months; and how many of these were new contracts rather than transitional arrangements.

Answered by Cabinet Office: The timeline for completing assessments of suppliers who have engaged in poor performance or professional misconduct is dependent on the circumstances of each individual case. The impact of the Horizon scandal on postmasters and their families has been horrendous. The Government is determined to hold those responsible to account and will continue to seek to make rapid progress on compensation …

View all 35 mentions →

Key facts

Duration (ongoing): 5 years, 4 months Total reported cost: £83.7m Witnesses: 298 Hearing days: 226 Statements: 788