Public Inquiry

Grenfell Tower Inquiry

Completed · Chair: Sir Martin Moore-Bick · Established August 2017 · Commissioned by Cabinet Office

Public inquiry into the fire at Grenfell Tower on 14 June 2017, which killed 72 people.

More about this inquiry

Public inquiry into the fire at Grenfell Tower on 14 June 2017, which killed 72 people. The inquiry examined the circumstances leading up to and surrounding the fire.

Where it stands

Public hearings were held on 418 days between July 2017 and November 2022.

The inquiry has published 2 reports, most recently Grenfell Tower Inquiry: Phase 2 Report on 4 September 2024.

The most recent government response on the record is Grenfell Tower Inquiry Phase 2 Report: Government response (HTML version), dated 26 February 2025.

Government response (104 recommendations)

Delivery (the addressees’ latest statements)

  • Home Office says completed 43
  • Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government says in progress 31
  • Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government says completed 30

Record checked against the sources 11 June 2026. Latest activity 10 September 2026.

Latest on the recommendations

All 104 recommendations

Reports

Reports and timeline

Recent milestones

  • Grenfell Tower Inquiry Phase 2 Report: Government response26 February 2025
  • Grenfell Tower Inquiry Phase 2 report published4 September 2024
  • Government Response4 September 2024
Full timeline

Costs

£177,639,000

Total reported cost to January 2025 Costs in detail

Parliament

202

mentions in Parliament Parliamentary activity

Recommendations

9 shown (filtered)
Clear filters

P2-1: Establish single construction industry regulator

Accepted in part · Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government says in progress

Recommended

That the government draw together under a single regulator all the functions relating to the construction industry to which we have referred. (113.6)

Since then (summary written by this site)

In September 2026, the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government reported that it had completed the transition of the Building Safety Regulator out of the Health and Safety Executive and published its consultation response on the single regulator (Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, Sep 2026). In the same September 2026 update, the department stated that bringing forward primary legislation is the next step, with introduction planned between 2027 and 2029 before the single regulator is established between 2028 and 2029 (Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, Sep 2026; Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, Sep 2026). HM Government had accepted the recommendation in principle in February 2025, excluding product testing and certification functions to avoid creating a conflict of interest (Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government response, Feb 2025).

Addressed to UK Government · Full record

P2-13: Make construction regulator responsible for product conformity certificates

Accepted in part · Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government says in progress

Recommended

That the construction regulator should be responsible for assessing the conformity of construction products with the requirements of legislation, statutory guidance and industry standards and issuing certificates as appropriate. We should expect such certificates to become pre-eminent in the market. (113.22)

Since then (summary written by this site)

The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government stated in September 2026 that it is reviewing responses to consultations on the Construction Products Reform White Paper and the General Safety Requirement, with plans to publish responses and set out next steps later in the year (Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, Sep 2026). The department's implementation timeline projects introducing primary and secondary legislation between 2027 and 2029 when parliamentary time allows, followed by establishing the single regulator and concluding the legislative framework between 2028 and 2029 (Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, Sep 2026).

Addressed to UK Government · Full record

P2-14: Require test results disclosure and transparency for construction products

Accepted in part · Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government says in progress

Recommended

a) that copies of all test results supporting any certificate issued by the construction regulator be included in the certificate; b) that manufacturers be required to provide the construction regulator with the full testing history of the product or material to which the certificate relates and inform the regulator of any material circumstances that may affect its performance; and c) manufacturers be required by law to provide on request copies of all test results that support claims about fire performance made for their products. (113.23)

Since then (summary written by this site)

In September 2026, the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government reported that consultations on its Construction Products Reform White Paper and a General Safety Requirement had closed, with responses being considered to refine proposals ahead of publishing government replies later in the year (Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, Sep 2026). The department set out in September 2026 that primary and secondary legislation remains to be introduced between 2027 and 2029 when parliamentary time allows, with the regulatory framework to be finalised and a single regulator established between 2028 and 2029 (Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, Sep 2026).

Addressed to UK Government · Full record

P2-25: Maintain public record of inquiry recommendations

Accepted in part · Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government says completed

Recommended

That it be made a legal requirement for the government to maintain a publicly accessible record of recommendations made by select committees, coroners and public inquiries together with a description of the steps taken in response. If the government decides not to accept a recommendation, it should record its reasons for doing so. Scrutiny of its actions should be a matter for Parliament, to which it should be required to report annually. (113.40)

Since then (summary written by this site)

In September 2026, Baroness Blake of Leeds stated that the government had delivered the Inquiry's recommendation on transparency through new dashboards that publicly track progress across inquiries (Baroness Blake of Leeds, Sep 2026). The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government previously reported in February 2026 that the recommendation was complete and had been fully discharged after launching quarterly dashboards on GOV.UK covering several inquiries (Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, Feb 2026). The department added that it would continue to review the need for legislation while maintaining and improving the dashboards (Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, Feb 2026).

Addressed to UK Government · Full record

P2-28: Require gas valve accessibility inspections every three years

Accepted in part · Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government says completed

Recommended

We therefore recommend that every gas transporter be required by law to check the accessibility of each such valve on its system at least once every three years and to report the results of that inspection to the Health and Safety Executive as part of its gas safety case review. (113.44)

Since then (summary written by this site)

The Inquiry recommended requiring gas transporters to inspect valve accessibility every three years. In September 2026, the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government stated that the recommendation was "complete and has been fully discharged" (Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, Sep 2026). The department previously reported in February 2026 that the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) was analysing network operator data to inform targeted engagement on valve access (Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, Feb 2026). In February 2025, HM Government had accepted the recommendation in principle, agreeing that valve accessibility is key but noting that inspection intervals might need to vary (Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government response, Feb 2025).

Addressed to UK Government · Full record

P2-29: Establish independent College of Fire and Rescue

Accepted in part · Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government says in progress

Recommended

We welcome the government’s ambition to create an independent College of Fire and Rescue expressed in the white paper Reforming our Fire and Rescue Service and we therefore recommend that the government establish such a college immediately with sufficient resources to provide the following services nationally: a. practical training at all levels supplementary to that provided by individual fire and rescue services; b. education in the form of lectures and seminars on different aspects of the work of the fire and rescue services in order to share experience and promote good practice; c. research into matters that may affect the work of the fire and rescue services, including major fires; d. the development of equipment, policies and procedures suitable for ensuring the effectiveness of fire and rescue services nationally and the safety of firefighters and the public; e. setting and maintaining national standards of managerial competence for senior managers, including control room managers, and providing management training for, and regular assessment of, senior ranks by reference to such standards. (113.51)

Since then (summary written by this site)

The Inquiry recommended establishing an independent College of Fire and Rescue. In September 2026, the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government reported that a public consultation on the college closed in July 2026, with work focused on analysing responses to inform a formal response and implementation plans (Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, Sep 2026). In its September 2026 timeline, the department scheduled publication of its consultation response for early 2027, with primary legislation planned between 2027 and 2029 and implementation beginning between 2028 and 2029 (Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, Sep 2026). HM Government accepted the recommendation in principle in February 2025, stating that establishing the college would require primary legislation (Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government response, Feb 2025).

Addressed to UK Government · Full record

P2-30: College to have permanent staff and training facilities

Accepted in part · Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government says in progress

Recommended

Although it is for the government to decide how the college should be constituted, we recommend that it should have a permanent staff of sufficient size to manage its operations and develop its functions in response to the demands of fire and rescue services nationally and the requirements of the board. The college will need access to permanent facilities, including facilities for practical training and education. We envisage that much of the training and education will be delivered and led by firefighters of suitable experience drawn as the occasion requires from fire and rescue services around the country. (113.53)

Since then (summary written by this site)

The Inquiry recommended that the fire college have permanent staff and practical training facilities. In September 2026, the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government reported that a public consultation on the college's aims, scope, and design closed in July 2026, though permanent staff and facilities were not mentioned (Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, Sep 2026). In its September 2026 timeline, the department indicated that publishing a consultation response in early 2027, primary legislation between 2027 and 2029, and implementation from 2028 remain outstanding (Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, Sep 2026). HM Government had accepted the recommendation in principle in February 2025, stating that the college's structure and delivery would be captured by the consultation (Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government response, Feb 2025).

Addressed to UK Government · Full record

P2-43: Require voluntary sector partnerships in contingency planning

Accepted in part · Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government says in progress

Recommended

Regulation 23 of the Civil Contingencies Act 2004 (Contingency Planning) Regulations 2005 requires a Category 1 responder to have regard when making its plans to the activities of relevant voluntary organisations. We therefore recommend that the regulation be amended to require Category 1 responders to establish and maintain partnerships with the voluntary, community and faith organisations in the areas in which they are responsible for preparing for and responding to emergencies. (113.68)

Since then (summary written by this site)

In September 2026, the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government reported that it is finalising updates to the National Resilience Standards to strengthen voluntary sector partnership working while continuing an impact assessment into statutory options (Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, Sep 2026). The department scheduled this assessment and its decision on how to strengthen partnerships for the final quarter of 2026 (Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, Sep 2026). In February 2026, the department stated that a public consultation found no consensus in favour of regulatory change, adding that a final decision on amending regulations will be taken during the 2027 review of the Civil Contingencies Act (Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, Feb 2026).

Addressed to UK Government · Full record

P2-48: Verify training quality of Category 1 responders

Accepted in part · Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government says in progress

Recommended

That a mechanism be introduced for independently verifying the frequency and quality of training provided by local authorities and other Category 1 responders. (113.71)

Since then (summary written by this site)

In September 2026, the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government reported that it had begun testing proposals with the sector to establish a reporting process on training quality and frequency (Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, Sep 2026; Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, Sep 2026). The department stated in September 2026 that publication of updated resilience guidance for local authorities had been delayed to the fourth quarter of 2026 to align with wider devolution and standards work (Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, Sep 2026; Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, Sep 2026). HM Government had previously accepted the recommendation in principle in February 2025, proposing revised national occupational standards and reporting frameworks across Category 1 responders (Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government response, Feb 2025).

Addressed to UK Government · Full record

Reports and timeline

Reports

Timeline

Grenfell Tower Fire

Fire at Grenfell Tower in North Kensington killed 72 people.

Inquiry Announced

Source

Grenfell Tower Fire (Written Ministerial Statement HCWS18)

Written Ministerial Statement HCWS18: "I am announcing today the appointment of Sir Martin Moore-Bick to head the Public Inquiry into the Grenfell Tower fire." The Inquiry's own key-documents page separately lists a Prime Minister's appointment letter dated 28 June 2017 (title only, not independently fetched this pass).

Source

Grenfell Tower Inquiry terms of reference published

Prime Minister's response accepting in full the Chairman's 10 August 2017 recommendation. Applies to the whole inquiry; both Phase 1 and Phase 2 operated under this single, unamended Terms of Reference (see grenfell_instruments.tsv).

Source

Procedural Hearing

First procedural hearing held.

Chairman's response to Procedural Hearing on 11-12 December 2017

Source

Inquiry publishes details of core participants

First published core participants list: 532 individuals and organisations designated by that date (504 bereaved/survivors/residents, 28 organisations). Applies to the whole inquiry (pre-phase split).

Source

Phase 1 Hearings Begin

Phase 1 hearings commenced, examining events of the night of the fire.

Show all 18 milestones

Grenfell Tower Inquiry Phase 1 evidential hearings begin

Phase 1. "Evidential hearings began on 4 June 2018." Preceded by commemorative hearings for the 72 who died, held 21-30 May 2018.

Source

Grenfell Tower Inquiry Phase 1 report published

Source

Grenfell Tower Inquiry Phase 1 report: government response

Phase 1. Joint response from the Ministry of Housing, Communities & Local Government and the Home Office, published 21 January 2020, responding to the 30 October 2019 Phase 1 report.

Source

Opening statements, 27 January 2020

Source

Presentations relating to the deceased, 21 July 2022

Source

Overarching statements and Module 7 closing statements, 7-10 November 2022

Source

Phase 2 oral closing statements concluded

Source

Government Response

Prime Minister apologised on behalf of the state.

Source

Grenfell Tower Inquiry Phase 2 report published

Source

Grenfell Tower Inquiry Phase 2 Report: Government response

Phase 2. Command paper CP 1248, joint response from the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, Cabinet Office and Home Office, presented to Parliament 26 February 2025 (page last updated 2 June 2025). Government committed to reporting annually to Parliament on implementation.

Source

Costs

Total reported cost: £177,639,000
Period Total Inquiry legal CP legal Source
Jan 2025 £4,426,000 £800,000 £1,017,000

FY24-25 (to Jan 2025)

Source and qualifications

Accounting period: 1 Apr 2024 to 31 Jan 2025.

Calculated from cumulative financial reports. Inquiry Legal = Chairman, Panel and Counsel. Staff = Secretariat, Accommodation and Operations. Technology = Hearing Room and Legal Tech. Other = Assessors and Expert Witnesses.

FY24-25 (to Jan 2025)

Jan 2025 (cum.) £177,639,000 £30,408,000 £68,888,000

Final Cost Report to 31 January 2025 (Cumulative)

Source and qualifications

Accounting period: 1 Aug 2017 to 31 Jan 2025.

Total inquiry costs Aug 2017 - Jan 2025. Inquiry Legal = Chairman (Sir Martin Moore-Bick), Panel and Counsel. Staff = Secretariat, Accommodation and Operations. Technology = Hearing Room and Legal Tech. Other = Assessors and Expert Witnesses. 619 core participants (585 BSR) funded through 24 solicitors firms and 59 counsel.

Final Cost Report to 31 January 2025 (Cumulative)

Mar 2024 £3,245,000 £1,444,000 £-1,785,000

FY23-24

Source and qualifications

Accounting period: 1 Apr 2023 to 31 Mar 2024.

Signed resource-accounting correction recorded 9 October 2026: the FY2023/24 financial report publishes a £1.785m credit (−£1,785,000) for Core Participant Recognised Legal Representation, reflecting suppliers overestimating prior-year billing. The report separately states actual cash spend of £122,000 for FY2023/24; that cash observation is neither a substitute for nor additive to the resource credit. The £3.245m period total remains unchanged. The earlier note saying the negative adjustment is shown as £0 is superseded; the prior notes below remain unchanged for audit and any other valid statements remain in force.

Prior notes (unchanged):
Calculated from cumulative financial reports. Inquiry Legal = Chairman, Panel and Counsel. Staff = Secretariat, Accommodation and Operations. Technology = Hearing Room and Legal Tech. Other = Assessors and Expert Witnesses. FY23-24 had negative CP Legal adjustment (-£1.8m) for prior over-estimates, shown as £0.

FY23-24

Mar 2023 £20,698,000 £4,815,000 £8,318,000

FY22-23

Source and qualifications

Accounting period: 1 Apr 2022 to 31 Mar 2023.

Calculated from cumulative financial reports. Inquiry Legal = Chairman, Panel and Counsel. Staff = Secretariat, Accommodation and Operations. Technology = Hearing Room and Legal Tech. Other = Assessors and Expert Witnesses.

FY22-23

Mar 2022 £31,939,000 £6,604,000 £11,299,000

FY21-22

Source and qualifications

Accounting period: 1 Apr 2021 to 31 Mar 2022.

Calculated from cumulative financial reports. Inquiry Legal = Chairman, Panel and Counsel. Staff = Secretariat, Accommodation and Operations. Technology = Hearing Room and Legal Tech. Other = Assessors and Expert Witnesses.

FY21-22

Mar 2021 £77,064,000 £11,615,000 £31,152,000

FY19-21 (Apr 2019 - Mar 2021)

Source and qualifications

Accounting period: 1 Apr 2019 to 31 Mar 2021.

Calculated from cumulative financial reports. Inquiry Legal = Chairman, Panel and Counsel. Staff = Secretariat, Accommodation and Operations. Technology = Hearing Room and Legal Tech. Other = Assessors and Expert Witnesses.

FY19-21 (Apr 2019 - Mar 2021)

Mar 2019 £40,267,000 £5,130,000 £18,887,000

FY17-19 (Aug 2017 - Mar 2019)

Source and qualifications

Accounting period: 1 Aug 2017 to 31 Mar 2019.

Calculated from cumulative financial reports. Inquiry Legal = Chairman, Panel and Counsel. Staff = Secretariat, Accommodation and Operations. Technology = Hearing Room and Legal Tech. Other = Assessors and Expert Witnesses.

FY17-19 (Aug 2017 - Mar 2019)

1 Aug 2017 – 31 Jan 2025 · Final Cost Report to 31 January 2025 (Cumulative)

Final Cost Report to 31 January 2025 (Cumulative)

Source and qualifications

Accounting period: 1 Aug 2017 to 31 Jan 2025.

Total inquiry costs Aug 2017 - Jan 2025. Inquiry Legal = Chairman (Sir Martin Moore-Bick), Panel and Counsel. Staff = Secretariat, Accommodation and Operations. Technology = Hearing Room and Legal Tech. Other = Assessors and Expert Witnesses. 619 core participants (585 BSR) funded through 24 solicitors firms and 59 counsel.

Final Cost Report to 31 January 2025 (Cumulative)

Detailed cost breakdown · to Jan 2025
Inquiry legal costs
£30,408,000
Core participant legal costs
£68,888,000
Staff
£40,670,000
Technology
£23,985,000
Other
£13,688,000

Parliamentary activity

202 mentions since Jun 2017
11 debates 129 questions 54 statements

Grenfell Tower inquiry Phase 2 Government Progress Report

Written Ministerial Statement House of Commons Florence Eshalomi · Labour

Statement: My Noble Friend the Minister for Building Safety, Fire and Resilience (Baroness Blake of Leeds CBE) has today made the following statement:The Grenfell Tower fire was a preventable tragedy that claimed 72 lives and exposed deep-rooted weaknesses in the systems designed to keep people safe. …

Grenfell Tower inquiry Phase 2 Government Progress Report

Written Ministerial Statement House of Lords Baroness Blake of Leeds · Labour

Statement: The Grenfell Tower fire was a preventable tragedy that claimed 72 lives and exposed deep-rooted weaknesses in the systems designed to keep people safe. It remains a profound failure of oversight and accountability which should never have happened and the bereaved, survivors and local community …

Arconic Architectural Products

Written Question House of Lords Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth · Conservative

Asked: To ask His Majesty's Government whether they are continuing to enter into contracts with Arconic for the supply of cladding panels.

Answered by Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: The Government remains committed to holding organisations to account for the failings identified by the Grenfell Tower Inquiry. Officials across Government continue to consider what further commercial measures may be appropriate while safeguarding the integrity of the criminal investigation. MHCLG does not enter into direct contracts with Arconic for the supply of cladding panels.

Grenfell Tower Inquiry

Written Question House of Commons Sir James Cleverly · Conservative

Asked: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, with reference to the written statement of 20 May 2026, HCWS51, on Grenfell Tower Inquiry Phase 2 Report Update, which organisations are subject to the policy of not sharing a public platform; and …

Answered by Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: The Government is committed to taking clear and proportionate action in response to the Grenfell Tower Inquiry’s findings. The Public Engagement Policy and which companies it applies to is published on GOV.UK . Ministers and senior civil servants will decide how and when they engage with external bodies bearing in mind the principles of accountability, transparency and the balance of …

Construction: Incentives

Written Question House of Lords Lord Hunt of Wirral · Conservative

Asked: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment it has made of the practical incentives, other than retention payments, available to ensure good building construction practices.

Answered by Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: Since 2023, dutyholders, including clients, principal contractors and principal designers, are regulated through the building control process. Prosecutions may be brought for breaches of the building regulations under Section 35 of the Building Act 1984 where appropriate. The government has also accepted a recommendation of the Grenfell Tower Inquiry Report to introduce principal contractor licensing, to ensure principal contractors working …

Buildings: Safety

Written Question House of Commons Edward Morello · Liberal Democrat

Asked: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what support is available to leaseholders in West Dorset facing costs associated with building safety remediation and compliance following the Grenfell Tower Inquiry.

Answered by Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: We recognise concerns about building safety costs and are clear that costs should be fair, transparent and represent value for money. Protections are in place to limit the costs of remediating historical building safety defects. Cladding remediation costs are met by Government funding programmes or developers, while further protections, including the Developer Remediation Contract, contribution caps for certain leaseholders, and …

High Rise Flats: Fire Prevention

Written Question House of Commons Edward Morello · Liberal Democrat

Asked: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what steps he is taking to ensure leaseholders are not required to meet the costs of remediation works arising from the Grenfell Tower Inquiry recommendations.

Answered by Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: We recognise concerns about building safety costs and are clear that costs should be fair, transparent and represent value for money. Protections are in place to limit the costs of remediating historical building safety defects. Cladding remediation costs are met by Government funding programmes or developers, while further protections, including the Developer Remediation Contract, contribution caps for certain leaseholders, and …

Grenfell Tower Inquiry Phase 2 Report Update

Written Ministerial Statement House of Lords Baroness Taylor of Stevenage · Labour

Statement: My Honourable Friend the Minister for Building Safety, Fire and Democracy (Samantha Dixon MBE MP) has today made the following statement:The Grenfell Tower tragedy exposed deep-rooted weaknesses in the systems designed to keep people safe. The preventable loss of 72 lives remains a profound failure …

View all 202 mentions →

Evidence & impact

AI-generated · 26 Mar 2026
The Grenfell Tower Inquiry was established following the fire on 14 June 2017 that resulted in 72 deaths. The inquiry, chaired by Sir Martin Moore-Bick, published its Phase 1 report in October 2019 focusing on the events of the night, and its Phase 2 report in September 2024 examining the causes of the fire.

The inquiry's Phase 1 recommendations led to documented changes in fire service operations. London Fire Brigade revised its policies for handling fire survival guidance calls and introduced new training on external wall fires. The National Fire Chiefs Council published guidance addressing evacuation strategies and external wall fire risks. Several fire services introduced electronic systems for recording emergency calls.

Two significant pieces of legislation followed the inquiry's work. The Fire Safety Act 2021 clarified that the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 applies to external walls and flat entrance doors. The Building Safety Act 2022 established the Building Safety Regulator and introduced new requirements for high-rise residential buildings, including the appointment of accountable persons and the maintenance of building safety information.

The inquiry's 104 recommendations span operational procedures, training requirements, regulatory reform, and building safety management. While legislative changes and operational reforms are documented in the public record, evidence of action on several specific recommendations, particularly those requiring inter-service coordination or standardised information systems, has not been identified in publicly available sources.
Reforms attributed to this inquiry · AI-generated• The Fire Safety Act 2021 extended the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 to cover external walls and flat entrance doors
• The Building Safety Act 2022 established the Building Safety Regulator and introduced requirements for building safety information
• London Fire Brigade introduced new policies for handling fire survival guidance calls following Phase 1 recommendations
• National Fire Chiefs Council published new guidance on evacuation strategies and external wall fires
• Fire and rescue services across England introduced training programmes on external wall fire risks
• Electronic systems for recording fire survival guidance calls introduced by multiple fire services
Unfinished business · AI-generated• No published evidence of legislation requiring building owners to provide external wall information to fire services in a standardised format
• No published evidence of mandatory national standards for control room to incident commander communications
• No published evidence of statutory requirements for regular refresher training intervals for control room operators
• No published evidence of implemented protocols for inter-service control room information sharing between LFB, LAS and MPS

Findings about the inquiry's recommendations as a whole

HM Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services (1 Nov 2024)
This site's summary of the finding: LFB rated "outstanding" for responding to major and multi-agency incidents. Significant improvements since January 2022 inspection. Understanding of risk improved.

Influence & connections

Influenced by Summerland Fire Inquiry
The Summerland fire of 1973 demonstrated that combustible cladding materials can enable rapid and catastrophic fire spread. The same lesson was tragically repeated at Grenfell Tower 44 years later.
Influenced by Ronan Point Inquiry
Ronan Point introduced the concept of resistance to disproportionate collapse in building regulations. The Grenfell Tower fire raised the same fundamental question about the gap between building regulation and safety in practice.

Key facts

Duration: 7 years Total reported cost: £177.6m Hearing days: 400 Core participants: 646 Statements: 1,500 Documents disclosed: 300,000 Report pages: 1,700