Select Committee · Committees on Arms Export Controls

UK arms exports in 2019

Status: Closed Opened: 9 Feb 2021 Closed: 9 Jan 2023 34 recommendations 12 conclusions 1 report

The Committees on Arms Export Controls are examining the Government’s 2019 Strategic Export Controls Annual Report (published in November 2020), with a focus on enforcement and compliance matters. This inquiry will build on issues identified during the scoping evidence sessions that CAEC has undertaken since it was re-established. Read the call for evidence for more …

Clear

Reports

1 report
Title HC No. Published Items Response
First Joint Report - Developments in UK Strategic Export C… HC 282 28 Oct 2022 46 Responded

Recommendations & Conclusions

7 items
5 Recommendation First Joint Report - Developments in U… Accepted in Part

We share our predecessor committees’ concerns over the continued delays in delivering the new LITE...

We share our predecessor committees’ concerns over the continued delays in delivering the new LITE IT system. The rollout of the new LITE IT system must be progressed urgently. In response to our report the Government should set out a specific timeline for each stage of the transition and the …

Government response. The government stated that the LITE IT service is being progressed urgently and is a live, functioning service being delivered in phases. It committed to providing six-monthly updates on progress but did not provide a specific timeline for each transition …
9 Recommendation First Joint Report - Developments in U… Accepted in Part

It is also disappointing that the Government has not published terms of reference outlining the...

It is also disappointing that the Government has not published terms of reference outlining the aims and remit of the ECJU Transformation Programme. The Government should publish the terms of reference for the ECJU Transformation Programme, and provide us with six-monthly updates on the Programme, including progress on its intended …

Government response. The government declined to publish formal terms of reference, stating the Transformation Programme is internal and its aims were already communicated. However, it committed to providing the committee with regular updates on the transformation and its continuous improvement activities.
10 Recommendation First Joint Report - Developments in U… Accepted in Part

We welcome the consultation that has taken place with the unions.

We welcome the consultation that has taken place with the unions. This must continue and the Government must ensure that they draw on the expertise of ECJU staff at all levels. We also welcome the customer survey of exporters. However, this engagement should go further We recommend that the Government …

Government response. The government stated the Transformation Programme is internal but committed to creating a new dedicated team and stakeholder engagement strategy in 2023 to establish formal mechanisms for consistent industry engagement. It did not commit to a broader public consultation.
15 Recommendation First Joint Report - Developments in U… Accepted in Part

In response to our report, the Government should set out which countries’ systems, from inside...

In response to our report, the Government should set out which countries’ systems, from inside and outside the EU, that it considered when drafting the new Criteria. The Government should also explain the processes it has put in place to ensure continued cooperation with the EU on strategic export controls. …

Government response. The government stated it benchmarked against the US, Germany, France, and Sweden when developing its approach. However, it rejected the recommendation for an independent review as unnecessary and disproportionate, and did not explain processes for continued EU cooperation.
17 Recommendation First Joint Report - Developments in U… Accepted in Part

We welcome the increase in trained Compliance Inspectors mentioned in the 2021 Annual Report.

We welcome the increase in trained Compliance Inspectors mentioned in the 2021 Annual Report. In response to our report the Government should give further details of this increase in Inspectors, including the numbers of Inspectors employed, details of the work they are undertaking and how they are measuring the impact …

Government response. The government provides details of five current Compliance Inspectors and the recruitment of three more, stating their current focus on priority intelligence-led visits, but does not explain how they are measuring the impact of this change.
19 Conclusion First Joint Report - Developments in U… Accepted in Part

We are concerned by the increase in recent years of the numbers of companies found...

We are concerned by the increase in recent years of the numbers of companies found to be non-compliant after a revisit and the lack of information given in the Annual Reports on specific companies and countries for findings of non-compliance. This raises questions over the effectiveness of compliance visits. (Paragraph …

Government response. The government defends its robust compliance approach and states the effectiveness of visits is demonstrated by reduced non-compliance on revisits. It also commits to reviewing the methodology of reporting in future Annual Reports to better demonstrate visit effectiveness, partially addressing …
22 Recommendation First Joint Report - Developments in U… Accepted in Part

We are also troubled by the concerns expressed regarding the level of technical knowledge within...

We are also troubled by the concerns expressed regarding the level of technical knowledge within ECJU and the reported reduction in technical experts accompanying compliance officers on compliance visits. We recommend that the ECJU ensure that technical experts accompany compliance inspectors on a greater number of visits and that the …

Government response. The government states that ECJU plans to reintroduce technical experts attending in-person compliance audits where beneficial, but does not explicitly commit to a greater number or a review of overall expertise levels within the Transformation Programme.

Oral evidence sessions

6 sessions
Date Witnesses
10 Feb 2022 Ranil Jayawardena MP · Department for International Trade, Rt Hon James Cleverly MP · Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office View ↗
16 Nov 2021 Joanne Cheetham · HM Revenue and Customs, Richard Las · HM Revenue and Customs View ↗
29 Jun 2021 David Lorello · Covington and Burling LLP, Dr Clara Portela · University of Valencia, Fenella McGerty · International Institute for Strategic Studies View ↗
18 May 2021 Andrew Kinniburgh · Make UK Defence, Nick Radiven · Prospect View ↗
20 Apr 2021 Mike Lewis · Conflict Armament Research View ↗
16 Mar 2021 Dr Andrea Edoardo Varisco · Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, Dr Sibylle Bauer · Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, Kolja Brockmann · Stockholm International Peace Research Institute View ↗

Correspondence

7 letters
DateDirectionTitle
7 Sep 2023 Correspondence from the Minister of State for International Trade, updating on …
24 May 2023 Correspondence with the Secretary of State for Business and Trade on the Govern…
4 Apr 2023 Correspondence from the Secretary of State for Business and Trade on the Govern…
20 Oct 2022 Annex A: Correspondence with the FCDO and DIT, dated 31 May 2022
20 Oct 2022 Annex B: Correspondence with the FCDO and DIT, dated 31 May 2022
20 Oct 2022 Correspondence from the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development and the Department …
20 Oct 2022 Annex C: Correspondence with the FCDO and DIT, dated 31 May 2022