Recommendations & Conclusions
13 items
5
Recommendation
3rd Report - Political finance and fore…
Accepted
Crypto donations pose an unnecessary and unacceptably high risk to the integrity of the political finance system and public trust in it. We accept that future regulations may institutionalise the use of alternative payment systems for use in donations. At present, however, the opportunity to evade rules is too high, …
Read more
Crypto donations pose an unnecessary and unacceptably high risk to the integrity of the political finance system and public trust in it. We accept that future regulations may institutionalise the use of alternative payment systems for use in donations. At present, however, the opportunity to evade rules is too high, the adequacy of mitigations too low, and the resource cost of attempting to implement acceptable oversight is disproportionate. We see no democratic imperative to permit the use of crypto in political finance until adequate safeguards are in place. (Conclusion, Paragraph 68)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government wholeheartedly agrees with the committee's conclusion and has accepted the recommendation to introduce an immediate moratorium on cryptoasset donations to political parties, effective from March 25, 2026, until sufficient safeguards are in place.
Read full response →
Cabinet Office
6
Recommendation
3rd Report - Political finance and fore…
Accepted
Crypto also poses wider upstream risks to the integrity of political finance: donors can convert ‘dirty’ foreign crypto funds into ‘clean’ UK fiat and then donate it without arousing much suspicion. A ‘last mile’ ban on crypto donations is therefore not a panacea. Specialist capabilities to address upstream risks are …
Read more
Crypto also poses wider upstream risks to the integrity of political finance: donors can convert ‘dirty’ foreign crypto funds into ‘clean’ UK fiat and then donate it without arousing much suspicion. A ‘last mile’ ban on crypto donations is therefore not a panacea. Specialist capabilities to address upstream risks are underpowered and require further work. (Conclusion, Paragraph 69)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government wholeheartedly agrees and has accepted a recommendation from the Rycroft Review to introduce an immediate moratorium on cryptoasset donations, which will apply from March 25, 2026.
Read full response →
Cabinet Office
7
Recommendation
3rd Report - Political finance and fore…
Accepted
The Government should introduce a binding moratorium on crypto donations as an amendment to the Representation of the People Bill. This moratorium should remain in place until the Electoral Commission has issued statutory guidance on crypto donations which applies to its regulated entities. The Bill should be further amended to …
Read more
The Government should introduce a binding moratorium on crypto donations as an amendment to the Representation of the People Bill. This moratorium should remain in place until the Electoral Commission has issued statutory guidance on crypto donations which applies to its regulated entities. The Bill should be further amended to provide for that guidance to be subject to the affirmative procedure to provide Parliament with an appropriate scrutiny opportunity and an opportunity to object. We suggest the Electoral Commission must develop satisfactory safeguards in time for the next General Election. (Recommendation, Paragraph 70) Corporate donations
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government wholeheartedly accepts the recommendation to introduce a binding moratorium on crypto donations, confirming that it will apply to all such donations from 25 March 2026, with a 30-day period for returning or forfeiting previous donations.
Read full response →
Cabinet Office
8
Recommendation
3rd Report - Political finance and fore…
Accepted
The Representation of the People Bill contains inexplicable deficiencies on corporate donations. We support limiting donations to those carrying out meaningful activity in the UK. However, the Bill contains a loophole, which would allow companies to donate the upper limit of their UK-generated revenue hundreds of times over to individual …
Read more
The Representation of the People Bill contains inexplicable deficiencies on corporate donations. We support limiting donations to those carrying out meaningful activity in the UK. However, the Bill contains a loophole, which would allow companies to donate the upper limit of their UK-generated revenue hundreds of times over to individual MPs and candidates. That needs fixing. (Conclusion, Paragraph 76)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government agrees with the concern about a loophole in corporate donations allowing multiple contributions and has accepted recommendations to fix it. It is introducing a new requirement for donors to submit a declaration to ensure companies do not evade rules on donation limits.
Read full response →
Cabinet Office
9
Recommendation
3rd Report - Political finance and fore…
Accepted
The Government should amend Part 4 of the Representation of the People Bill to specify that limits on corporate donations apply to the total amount per company, rather than per recipient. (Recommendation, Paragraph 77) 39 Criminal liability for acting as a foreign conduit
Read more
The Government should amend Part 4 of the Representation of the People Bill to specify that limits on corporate donations apply to the total amount per company, rather than per recipient. (Recommendation, Paragraph 77) 39 Criminal liability for acting as a foreign conduit
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government agrees with the concern regarding corporate donation limits and has accepted in full a similar recommendation from the Rycroft review, also introducing a declaration requirement for donors above a set threshold.
Read full response →
Cabinet Office
10
Conclusion
3rd Report - Political finance and fore…
Accepted
The Representation of the People Bill does not include strong enough safeguards to prevent UK subsidiaries donating on behalf of foreign parent companies or wealthy individuals. There are further loopholes enabling donors to receive large sums of foreign money in connection with a donation and not declare it. And it …
Read more
The Representation of the People Bill does not include strong enough safeguards to prevent UK subsidiaries donating on behalf of foreign parent companies or wealthy individuals. There are further loopholes enabling donors to receive large sums of foreign money in connection with a donation and not declare it. And it has missed opportunities to amend the terminology on donor and recipient due diligence responsibilities, which currently hamper law enforcement from launching adequate investigations and bringing prosecutions. (Conclusion, Paragraph 90)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government agrees with the concern regarding corporate donation limits and has accepted a similar Rycroft review recommendation in full, also introducing a declaration requirement for donors above a set threshold to prevent evasion.
Read full response →
Cabinet Office
11
Recommendation
3rd Report - Political finance and fore…
Accepted
We welcome the Government’s commitment to commence Section 54A of the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act. But the provisions need more work to adequately address concerns about donors acting as conduits for foreign money. We are sceptical about simply commencing 54A via secondary legislation without amendments. (Conclusion, Paragraph 91)
Read more
We welcome the Government’s commitment to commence Section 54A of the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act. But the provisions need more work to adequately address concerns about donors acting as conduits for foreign money. We are sceptical about simply commencing 54A via secondary legislation without amendments. (Conclusion, Paragraph 91)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government commits to commencing Section 54A PPERA before the end of this Parliament, introducing a declaration requirement, a new due diligence requirement, and amending the threshold to prevent foreign or impermissible donations.
Read full response →
Cabinet Office
12
Recommendation
3rd Report - Political finance and fore…
Accepted
The Government should amend the Representation of the People Bill to introduce an alternative version of Section 54A in primary legislation. This would create a critical mechanism to implement much needed changes. (Recommendation, Paragraph 92)
Government response AI summary
The government agrees with the objective and will commit to commencing Section 54A PPERA before the end of Parliament, introducing a declaration requirement for donations above a set threshold, and amending the S54A threshold.
Read full response →
Cabinet Office
14
Recommendation
3rd Report - Political finance and fore…
Accepted
The alternative version of Section 54A should specify that the relevant persons are liable if they fail to act on ‘reasonable grounds to suspect’ that a false declaration or otherwise impermissible donation is being facilitated. Such changes would bring the legislation in line with money laundering rules and the Proceeds …
Read more
The alternative version of Section 54A should specify that the relevant persons are liable if they fail to act on ‘reasonable grounds to suspect’ that a false declaration or otherwise impermissible donation is being facilitated. Such changes would bring the legislation in line with money laundering rules and the Proceeds of Crime Act. Donors should also have to make an explicit declaration subject to criminal liability that they are not donating money for or on behalf of a foreign entity. Related changes should apply to other relevant aspects of PPERA and the Representation of the People Bill. (Recommendation, Paragraph 94)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government agrees with the objective and will commence Section 54A PPERA before the end of Parliament, introducing a declaration requirement for donations with criminal liability for false declarations, and a new due diligence requirement for donors.
Read full response →
Cabinet Office
15
Recommendation
3rd Report - Political finance and fore…
Accepted
The alternative version of Section 54A should specify that a regulated recipient may not accept a donation where there is ‘reasonable grounds to suspect’ that it derives from an impermissible foreign source, or has been provided in connection with an impermissible foreign source. Serious failures to conduct adequate due diligence …
Read more
The alternative version of Section 54A should specify that a regulated recipient may not accept a donation where there is ‘reasonable grounds to suspect’ that it derives from an impermissible foreign source, or has been provided in connection with an impermissible foreign source. Serious failures to conduct adequate due diligence in this regard should be subject to criminal proceedings. (Recommendation, Paragraph 95) 40
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government agrees with the objective and will commence Section 54A PPERA before the end of Parliament, introducing a declaration requirement for donations above a set threshold, establishing criminal liability for false declarations, and amending the S54A threshold.
Read full response →
Cabinet Office
17
Recommendation
3rd Report - Political finance and fore…
Accepted
The Government should review options to reduce the risk of foreign money entering UK political finance via individual donors whose primary long- term residence is overseas. For example, individual donors whose primary residence is overseas could be required to have UK financial assets registerable with HM Revenue and Customs for …
Read more
The Government should review options to reduce the risk of foreign money entering UK political finance via individual donors whose primary long- term residence is overseas. For example, individual donors whose primary residence is overseas could be required to have UK financial assets registerable with HM Revenue and Customs for the past 12 months which are sufficient to cover the cost of their donation. This would broadly mirror the Bill’s other requirements for corporate donors to have generated sufficient money in the UK. (Recommendation, Paragraph 103) Source of funds
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government agrees with the concern and will introduce a £100,000 annual cap on donations from overseas electors, effective from March 2026, alongside a minimum residency period for individuals returning to the UK.
Read full response →
Cabinet Office
18
Conclusion
3rd Report - Political finance and fore…
Accepted
We welcome the proposed improvement to the Electoral Commission’s data sharing powers under Clause 69. (Conclusion, Paragraph 107)
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the importance and confirms it is taking forward measures through the Representation of the People Bill to extend the Electoral Commission's data sharing and receiving powers. It states it will amend the Bill accordingly, though some tools require further consideration.
Read full response →
Cabinet Office
19
Conclusion
3rd Report - Political finance and fore…
Accepted
The Electoral Commission needs new powers to ask for information about whether the source of funds used in political donations is permissible. This is vital to ensuring effective deterrence and enabling the regulator to identify risks of foreign money. At the moment the Electoral Commission’s powers are too circumscribed: it …
Read more
The Electoral Commission needs new powers to ask for information about whether the source of funds used in political donations is permissible. This is vital to ensuring effective deterrence and enabling the regulator to identify risks of foreign money. At the moment the Electoral Commission’s powers are too circumscribed: it cannot launch investigations without high evidence thresholds, and it cannot obtain that evidence without a formal investigation. (Conclusion, Paragraph 114)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government recognizes the importance of equipping the Electoral Commission and will extend its powers to require information disclosure outside of formal investigations and enable information sharing with relevant public authorities.
Read full response →
Cabinet Office