Source · Select Committees · Public Accounts Committee

Tenth Report - Restoration and Renewal of Parliament

Public Accounts Committee HC 49 Published 29 June 2022

Report Status

Government responded

Conclusions & Recommendations

40 items (11 recs)

Source

View on Parliament website ↗

Government Response

AI assessment · 40 of 40 classified

Accepted 22

Accepted in Part 1

Acknowledged 12

Deferred 4

Not Addressed 1

Government response

Treasury minutes: Government response to the Committee of Public Accounts on the Tenth report from Session 2022-23 · published 2 Sep 2022

Read the government response ↗ Response on the Index

Recommendations & Conclusions

1 item

6 Recommendation Not Addressed

The Parliamentary Accounting Officers have not made clear whether the House authorities can deliver the...

Recommendation

The Parliamentary Accounting Officers have not made clear whether the House authorities can deliver the work envisaged by Parliament. We are concerned that the Clerks may feel constrained in sharing their professional views as Accounting and Corporate officers on what … Read more The Parliamentary Accounting Officers have not made clear whether the House authorities can deliver the work envisaged by Parliament. We are concerned that the Clerks may feel constrained in sharing their professional views as Accounting and Corporate officers on what is deliverable. For government programmes, Accounting Officers must assess the delivery risks, publishing a summary of these, and seek a ministerial direction should they consider what they are being asked to do is undeliverable. In January 2020 the Speaker of the House established a new procedure, modelled on Accounting Officers’ ability to seek a ministerial direction, allowing the Clerk of the House to place a statement of his views in the House of Commons Library, if he feels a decision taken by the Speaker comprises either a substantial breach of the Standing Orders, or a departure from long-established conventions, without authorisation by the House itself.1 The Clerks have not shared their views on what work could be delivered. The Commissions convened an independent panel to provide them with advice and assurance on both the governance options and proposed approach to the work. The Commissions considered the independent panel’s review in June 2022, subsequently publishing this as part of a joint report setting out areas the Houses would be invited to vote on. Recommendations: Given their roles as Accounting and Corporate Officers, the Clerks should make available to Members their expert advice on the future programme governance and the viability of different approach to the works. Should the Clerks be tasked with delivering a programme which they cannot assure themselves is value for money, or the best use of taxpayers’ funds, then following the principle of transparency set out by the Speaker in January 2020, 1 Letter from the Speaker, Sir Lindsay Hoyle, to the Clerk of the House, Dr John Benger, January 29, 2020 Restoration and Renewal of Parliament 9 they should write to the Commons and Lord Show less

Government Response Summary

The government's response provides lists of Treasury Minutes responses for previous sessions without addressing the specific recommendation about the Clerks making their expert advice available and writing to the Commons and Lords should they be tasked with delivering a programme which they cannot assure themselves is value for money.

HM Treasury

View Details →