Source · Select Committees · Public Accounts Committee

Recommendation 34

34

In our May evidence session we asked the Delivery Authority whether, given its earlier analysis...

Conclusion
In our May evidence session we asked the Delivery Authority whether, given its earlier analysis of continued presence options, it was comfortable developing these current options. The Delivery Authority told us that it had agreed a task brief to respond to a new and different question on the issue of decant.91 In May 2022, the Clerk told us that whatever option was ultimately decided upon, some form of decant for a “significant period of time” would be required in order to restore and renew the services in and around the two Chambers.92 Transparency and accountability
Government Response

A response document is linked to this report, dated 2 September 2022. Response attribution to this conclusion has not been verified. Read the response document ↗