Recommendation 4

HM Government Not Addressed

The Commissions have asked for further options to be explored but is unclear how the higher costs, greater duration and added risks, including extraordinary health and safety risks, of a continued presence during the building works can be managed. 4. PAC recommendation: The Clerks should set out the threshold of risk they are willing to accept during the works and report back on this level of risk, the trade-offs they feel are possible and how this impacts the potential approach to work. The Delivery Authority should progress the intrusive surveys during the summer to determine what the asbestos removal plan should be, including whether it is safe to remain in the Palace whilst these works take place. Risk threshold The Clerk of the House and the Clerk of the Parliaments agree with the Committee’s recommendation. Target implementation date: risk management processes are already in place. Subject to endorsement by both Houses of Parliament, the target date for implementing the new two-tier governance structure is the end of the calendar year. The articulation of threshold for risk during the works, acceptability of trade-offs and impact on the approach to works will accompany the strategic case that will be put to Parliament. The Clerk of the House and the Clerk of the Parliaments have legal responsibilities relating to the safety of those who work in or visit the Palace and are therefore responsible for the prevention of avoidable serious incidents. In discharging their duties, the Clerks receive advice from experts and have risk, audit and assurance processes in place. Risk management is part of the internal control and assurance arrangements of both Houses. The approach to managing risk is aligned to the Treasury Orange Book and underpinned 41 through professional risk training delivered in partnership with the Institute of Risk Management. The effectiveness of risk as a management control is overseen through the corporate governance arrangements of both Houses. The most significant risks identified are managed directly by the Boards of each House and are recorded in the principal risk register. Whilst each House maintains their own principal risk register a number of risks are managed bicamerally, to increase the effectiveness of controls. This has included a bicameral safety principal risk: both Boards, using the risk management framework, have agreed a cautious risk appetite in this area. The safety risk is subject to regular reviews throughout the year to assess the effectiveness of agreed mitigations. A key mitigation is the role of the Parliamentary Safety Assurance Board (PSAB) who provide leadership and proactive strategic direction in relation to the management of safety, fire and food safety risks for both Houses. Paragraph 18 of the Commissions’ Report recommends that the “the evaluation criteria for the delivery method should explicitly include health and safety risks to building users, including during the works”. The Clerks will ensure that this is a primary criterion for the options assessment and associated Member consultation and other engagement leading up to debates and decisions on the strategic case which will be put to Parliament. Under the new governance arrangements, the Clerk of the House and the Clerk of the Parliaments will have a legal responsibility relating to the R&R works. The two Clerks, supported by the head of the Client Team, will report to the Programme Board and Client Board on levels of risk. However, risk management is not a static activity: risks may change over time and vary depending on the options proposed by the Delivery Authority. The Clerk of the House and the Clerk of the Parliaments will consider the risks on a regular basis, determine whether appropriate mitigations are in place or available, take into account all relevant considerations and advice, and then form a judgment based on all the evidence. There will be trade-offs to consider regarding any potential approaches to the works, some of which may be for Members of both Houses to determine. However, the responsibility for health and safety cannot be delegated and the Clerk of the House and the Clerk of the Parliaments must always act in accordance with their statutory responsibilities. Intrusive surveys The Sponsor Body CEO and the Delivery Authority CEO accept this recommendation. Target implementation date: This recommendation is already being implemented, with plans for commencing intrusive surveys on track to start in July 2022. The plans for commencing intrusive surveys in the upcoming recess periods, which will continue to run over the next few years, are on track to start in July 2022. These surveys will provide the Delivery Authority with key structural and ground condition information as well as adding to the existing records of asbestos. This additional information will provide further details on the quantity, type and location of asbestos in the areas being surveyed. Determining how asbesto