Select committee: Public Accounts Committee
Recommendation 3
65th Report - Efficiency and resilience of the Probation Service
Published 4 Feb 2026
Addressed to HM Treasury
Public Accounts Committee Efficiency and resilience of the Probation Service All items in this report Report on parliament.uk ↗ Inquiry on parliament.uk ↗
Recommendation (the committee's words)
Longstanding staff shortages have left probation staff dealing with excessive and unmanageable workloads. At March 2025, there were 5,636 full-time equivalent probation officers in post, 79% of target staffing. According to HMPPS’s data, probation officers have been working on average at 118% capacity for several years, with highs of 126% in some regions, including London. However, actual workloads will have been higher than this as HMPPS’s recent refresh of probation activity timings showed it had seriously underestimated the time needed for staff to complete tasks. This underestimation, on top of existing staff vacancies, meant that it had been operating the service with just half the number of sentence management staff required. Probation staff have also had to deal with a high level of change to probation processes, which adds to their workloads. Researchers told us that probation staff have felt alienated by frequent changes and that the Probation Service’s culture is built on ‘emotional strain’ and ‘trauma’. Staff sickness and staff turnover has risen or remained high - in the year ending March 2025, the leaving rate for probation staff was 9.3% (6.2% in 2021) and sickness rate was 13.2 working days (8.9 in 2021). The most common cause of staff sickness is mental ill health. 4 recommendation HMPPS should, in its Treasury Minute response, set out: a. when and how it expects to be able to provide clarity to staff on when their workloads will reduce to acceptable levels; and b. the volume of changes it expects staff will need to introduce and how it plans to make this manageable for staff.
From: Public Accounts Committee, 65th Report - Efficiency and resilience of the Probation Service (HC 1235), 4 February 2026
Government response
The government responded to the whole report on 7 April 2026 (deadline 4 April 2026).
Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.The government states that it "agrees with the Committee's recommendation" on each of the Committee's recommendations, and sets out timelines, a revised performance framework and reporting commitments.
- On performance, the government "expects the Probation Service to demonstrate measurable and sustained improvements" over the spending review period to March 2029, with a revised performance framework centred on "a smaller number of priority metrics" to be introduced in April 2026.
- On reoffending, it says it is "very challenging to attribute changes in the reoffending measure to individual initiatives", and that evaluation of 'Reset' "will be published by July 2026".
- On workloads, the Our Future Probation Service programme was launched with the "primary objective to reduce workloads by 25% by April 2027", and HMPPS plans to share more detail with staff during March and April 2026.
- It commits to write to the Committee on Serco's performance against its key performance indicators within six months of the report (target August 2026), and on third and private sector support and electronic monitoring capacity (target October 2026).