Select Committee · Public Accounts Committee

Fraud and Error

Status: Closed Opened: 23 Mar 2021 Closed: 16 Nov 2021 16 recommendations 15 conclusions 1 report

Before the COVID-19 pandemic, the Government Counter Fraud Function estimated that the level of fraud and error against government was already between £29.3 billion and £51.8 billion annually. The National Audit Office’s work over the past year has shown that the risk of fraud and error has risen significantly during the pandemic, with particular concerns … Show more

Clear

Reports

1 report
Title HC No. Published Items Response
Ninth Report - Fraud and Error HC 253 30 Jun 2021 31 Responded

Recommendations & Conclusions

2 items
23 Recommendation Ninth Report - Fraud and Error Rejected

In written evidence Cifas, the UK’s largest cross-sector fraud sharing organisation, told us there should...

In written evidence Cifas, the UK’s largest cross-sector fraud sharing organisation, told us there should be transparency around the businesses that have been in receipt of COVID-19 support scheme funds, and, in its submission to us, the Fraud Advisory Panel agreed that transparency around fraud and error is “imperative” to … Read more

Government response AI summary
The government explicitly disagrees with the recommendation to set out new transparency principles for government support schemes, including a presumption of publishing business beneficiaries. It cites a duty to protect the privacy of small businesses and clarifies that information is published where required, with facilities …
Read full response →
HM Treasury
30 Conclusion Ninth Report - Fraud and Error Rejected

We asked DWP and HMRC about the different departmental responses to similar fraudulent actions, such...

We asked DWP and HMRC about the different departmental responses to similar fraudulent actions, such as concealment of earnings. HMRC told us it has a policy of using criminal investigations in only the most serious cases, where it is the necessary response and where it will have a real deterrent … Read more

Government response AI summary
The government rejected what it interpreted as a recommendation, disagreeing with the committee's implied criticism of different departmental responses to fraud and stating that DWP and HMRC strategies are closely aligned, while committing to keep practices under review.
Read full response →
HM Treasury

Oral evidence sessions

1 session
Date Witnesses
29 Apr 2021 Cat Little · Cabinet Office, Jim Harra · HMRC, Mark Cheeseman · Cabinet Office, Peter Schofield · Department for Work and Pensions, Sarah Munby · Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy View ↗

Who gave evidence

5 witnesses
WitnessOrganisationSessions
Cat Little · Permanent Secretary Cabinet Office 1
Jim Harra · Permanent Secretary and Chief Executive HMRC 1
Mark Cheeseman · Director, Government Counter Fraud Function Cabinet Office 1
Peter Schofield · Permanent Secretary Department for Work and Pensions 1
Sarah Munby · Permanent Secretary Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy 1

Correspondence

6 letters
DateDirectionTitle
14 Dec 2021 Correspondence from Mark Cheeseman, Director of the Government Counter Fraud Fu…
14 Dec 2021 Correspondence from Sarah Munby, Permanent Secretary, Department for Business, …
25 Oct 2021 Correspondence from Jim Harra, Chief Executive and First Permanent Secretary, r…
25 May 2021 Correspondence from Mark Cheeseman, Director of the Government Counter Fraud Fu…
25 May 2021 Correspondence from George Turner, Director, TaxWatch, re Response to Fraud and…
18 May 2021 Correspondence from Jim Harra, Chief Executive and First Permanent Secretary, r…