Select Committee · Public Accounts Committee

Asylum accommodation and support transformation programme

Status: Closed Opened: 7 Sep 2020 Closed: 25 Mar 2021 6 recommendations 18 conclusions 1 report

The Home Office designed the 2019-2029 asylum seeker accommodation and support contracts to improve services for asylum seekers and their families while their applications for asylum in the UK are being considered. These replaced the previous COMPASS contracts for asylum seeker support with seven similar regional contracts for accommodation and transport, and a new national … Show more

Clear

Reports

1 report
Title HC No. Published Items Response
Twenty-Fifth Report - Asylum accommodation and support tran… HC 683 20 Nov 2020 24 Responded

Recommendations & Conclusions

7 items
1 Conclusion Twenty-Fifth Report - Asylum accommodat… Not Addressed

On the basis of a report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, we took evidence...

On the basis of a report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, we took evidence from the Home Office (the Department) about asylum accommodation and support services in the UK.2

Government response AI summary
The government's response acknowledges the committee's report, stating it is the government's official response to the findings.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
7 Conclusion Twenty-Fifth Report - Asylum accommodat… Not Addressed

As well as call volumes, we asked whether the AIRE service had underestimated the length...

As well as call volumes, we asked whether the AIRE service had underestimated the length of each call. The Department had historical data that suggested calls would take between 12 and 17 minutes. In contrast, Migrant Help based its bid for the AIRE service on an average call length of … Read more

Government response AI summary
The government's response, despite stating agreement with a 'recommendation,' discusses considering future models for asylum seeker accommodation and improving current contracts, including recovering from pandemic impacts. It does not specifically address the committee's observations regarding the AIRE service's call capacity, underestimated call length, or its …
Read full response →
HM Treasury
10 Conclusion Twenty-Fifth Report - Asylum accommodat… Not Addressed

The Department expected providers to be able to share data as part of the new...

The Department expected providers to be able to share data as part of the new contracts, to make sure they are providing the service expected for asylum seekers. The contracts required an automated link for issue reporting between the AIRE provider and the accommodation providers.23 However, the NAO found that … Read more

Government response AI summary
The government response discusses improving general engagement mechanisms with stakeholders and developing a Directorate Engagement Strategy, but it does not address the Committee's specific conclusion regarding the lack of automated data sharing links between AIRE and accommodation providers.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
12 Conclusion Twenty-Fifth Report - Asylum accommodat…

We examined the Windrush scandal in March 2019 and found that the Department lacked understanding...

We examined the Windrush scandal in March 2019 and found that the Department lacked understanding of the needs of applicants for compensation, did not monitor the impact of its ‘compliant environment’ policy on vulnerable members of society and had not done enough to identify people that might have been affected. … Read more

HM Treasury
15 Conclusion Twenty-Fifth Report - Asylum accommodat… Not Addressed

The Department explained that its aim was for as few service users as possible to...

The Department explained that its aim was for as few service users as possible to be accommodated in hotels and that those who do spend as little time as possible in hotels once they are there.37 The Department expected providers to move people with straightforward needs into dispersed accommodation within … Read more

Government response AI summary
The government's response commits to reducing and ending routine hotel accommodation use by procuring more dispersed accommodation and moving on those with concluded asylum claims. However, it does not specifically address the committee's observation regarding provider incentives or the penalty structure for lengthy hotel stays.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
17 Conclusion Twenty-Fifth Report - Asylum accommodat… Not Addressed

The Department told us that it currently accommodated asylum seekers in hotels in approximately 50...

The Department told us that it currently accommodated asylum seekers in hotels in approximately 50 local authorities. It noted that whenever it arranges for a hotel to be used for asylum accommodation, it instructs its relevant teams to contact the local authority and MP affected. We were therefore concerned to … Read more

Government response AI summary
The government response discusses improving general engagement mechanisms with stakeholders and local authorities. However, it does not specifically address the Committee's concern about the lack of timely notification to local authorities and MPs regarding the use of hotels for asylum accommodation.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
23 Conclusion Twenty-Fifth Report - Asylum accommodat… Not Addressed

The Department told us that 429 asylum seekers had been tested for COVID-19, 122 of...

The Department told us that 429 asylum seekers had been tested for COVID-19, 122 of whom had tested positive.63 In its letter to us after our evidence session, the Department further explained that of those that had tested positive, 29 asylum seekers were in hotels.64 The Department also told us … Read more

Government response AI summary
Although the government states it agrees with the recommendation (despite the item being a conclusion), its response focuses on reducing and ending the routine use of hotel accommodation and increasing dispersed accommodation, rather than addressing the specific observations about COVID-19 testing, management difficulties during the …
Read full response →
HM Treasury

Oral evidence sessions

1 session
Date Witnesses
1 Oct 2020 Matthew Rycroft CBE · Home Office, Sean Palmer · Home Office, Shona Dunn · Home Office View ↗

Who gave evidence

3 witnesses
WitnessOrganisationSessions
Matthew Rycroft CBE · Permanent Secretary Home Office 1
Sean Palmer · Director, Immigration and Protection Home Office 1
Shona Dunn · Second Permanent Secretary Home Office 1

Correspondence

5 letters
DateDirectionTitle
16 Apr 2021 Correspondence from Matthew Rycroft CB, Permanent Secretary, Home Office, re Tr…
16 Mar 2021 Correspondence from Matthew Rycroft CBE, Permanent Secretary Home Office, re Re…
8 Mar 2021 Correspondence from PAC Chair Meg Hillier to Matthew Rycroft CBE, Permanent Sec…
12 Jan 2021 Correspondence from Matthew Rycroft, Permanent Secretary, Home Office, re Twent…
20 Oct 2020 Correspondence from Matthew Rycroft, Permanent Secretary, Home Office, re Home …