Recommendations & Conclusions
22 items
2
Conclusion
10th Report - HS2: Update following the…
Accepted
The Department and HS2 Ltd’s failure to work together effectively is starkly illustrated by them not being able to agree how much HS2 will cost. The Department and HS2 Ltd have still not agreed on how much it will cost to complete Phase 1. They are yet to reach agreement …
Read more
The Department and HS2 Ltd’s failure to work together effectively is starkly illustrated by them not being able to agree how much HS2 will cost. The Department and HS2 Ltd have still not agreed on how much it will cost to complete Phase 1. They are yet to reach agreement on the methodology and assumptions that underpin their cost estimates. This has been exacerbated by HS2 Ltd failing to ensure it receives reliable data from its supply chain. The existing budget, set in 2019, is no longer viable. With the estimates for completing Phase 1 now as high as £66bn in 2019 4 prices and inflation adjustments potentially representing an additional £10bn, the total programme costs could be close to £80bn. Only when the Department and HS2 Ltd are able to agree on cost estimates will they be able to agree a budget with HM Treasury. In the interim, the Department is agreeing annual budget settlements for HS2 Ltd, a short–term funding approach that provides poor value for money for the delivery of any long– term infrastructure project. recommendation Alongside its Treasury Minute response, the Department should write to the committee, setting out details of the agreed cost estimate methodology. The Department should also include in its next six–monthly update to Parliament when it will update programme costs into current prices and how frequently it will do this in the future.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government agrees, stating it is finalizing the cost estimating methodology with HS2 Ltd over the summer and will fully implement it as part of the program reset in 2026. It commits to providing a further update to the Committee with details on the agreed …
Read full response →
HM Treasury
5
Conclusion
10th Report - HS2: Update following the…
Accepted
The Department and HS2 Ltd do not have the skills and capabilities needed to successfully deliver the programme. The Public Accounts Committee has repeatedly raised concerns over the Department and HS2 Ltd having the skills and capability they need. Following the cancellation of Phase 2, HS2 Ltd now needs to …
Read more
The Department and HS2 Ltd do not have the skills and capabilities needed to successfully deliver the programme. The Public Accounts Committee has repeatedly raised concerns over the Department and HS2 Ltd having the skills and capability they need. Following the cancellation of Phase 2, HS2 Ltd now needs to reinforce its capability, such as in commercial management, and focus its culture on the singular purpose of delivering Phase 1 for the lowest feasible cost. The company now has new leadership in Mark Wild, who brings experience of delivering Crossrail and is tasked with delivering the programme’s reset. There are also likely to be changes in advance of the reset to how the Department engages with HS2 Ltd as well as how it organises itself internally following the conclusion of the Major Transport Project Governance and Assurance Review. However, we are not convinced that the Department has sufficiently considered how it could bring fresh thinking to its own leadership of HS2, or whether it has the right skills and capabilities in place to lead the programme effectively and credibly. 6 recommendation The Department should, alongside the reset of the programme, set out how gaps in skills and capabilities, such as in leadership and other key areas, will be addressed to secure the successful delivery of HS2. This should include the performance measures or indicators that leaders will be reviewed against.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government is undertaking a comprehensive change programme to reshape HS2 Ltd's organisation, including executive leadership changes, appointing a new Chair to review board capability, and commencing recruitment for identified gaps. Key performance indicators for 2025-26 are being agreed and will be published, alongside a …
Read full response →
HM Treasury
6
Conclusion
10th Report - HS2: Update following the…
Accepted
The Department’s plans for Euston carry huge risks given the uncertainties about its scope, cost, funding, schedule and delivery model. In the 2024 Autumn budget, the government confirmed that HS2 would terminate at London Euston rather than Old Oak Common in West London, but the scope of the work needed …
Read more
The Department’s plans for Euston carry huge risks given the uncertainties about its scope, cost, funding, schedule and delivery model. In the 2024 Autumn budget, the government confirmed that HS2 would terminate at London Euston rather than Old Oak Common in West London, but the scope of the work needed at Euston is unclear. The task at Euston is significant as there is not only the construction of the HS2 station and potential allowance for future expansion, but also redevelopment of the existing Network Rail station, the underground station and the surrounding area, all within an extremely tight space. The Department has not yet decided on the final delivery model for work at Euston and how this connects with possible commercial development. Its current ambition is also for the approximately £6 billion cost at Euston to be funded through significant contributions from the private sector. However, there is not yet a clear plan for this and we are sceptical that the private sector will provide this level of contribution. In the meantime, local businesses, residents and passengers will continue to face significant disruption at Euston for many years to come. recommendation The Department should include in the six–monthly update to Parliament an update on its progress on Euston, including progress in establishing a delivery model and private financing for the works; how it is managing risks; and latest figures for both the spend to date and total cost estimate.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government agrees to include an update on Euston's progress in its six-monthly report to Parliament in Summer 2025, covering the delivery model, private financing, risk management, and cost figures. They are also responding to a separate committee letter regarding the Euston tunnelling schedule.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
7
Conclusion
10th Report - HS2: Update following the…
Accepted
Things are moving too slowly on making decisions on the disposal of land and property purchased as part of the programme. The Department has yet to determine what land and property can be disposed of following the cancellation of Phase 2, and what land it will retain ownership of for …
Read more
Things are moving too slowly on making decisions on the disposal of land and property purchased as part of the programme. The Department has yet to determine what land and property can be disposed of following the cancellation of Phase 2, and what land it will retain ownership of for the purpose of potential future work. In February 2024, the previous Public Accounts Committee stressed the need for the Department and HS2 Ltd to develop a strategy for the disposal of land and property, and to balance this with the needs of those who have been affected. Very little progress has been made and people who previously owned property that is no longer needed, and who may welcome the opportunity to buy it back, are still waiting for clear timeframes and answers. This includes properties that were already no longer required from changes to the HS2 route in 7
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government agrees with the recommendation, is undertaking a review of the Phase 2 land portfolio including identifying Crichel Down properties, and will write to the Committee to confirm next steps for a disposal programme. This information, along with approaches to future West Coast Main …
Read full response →
HM Treasury
8
Conclusion
10th Report - HS2: Update following the…
Accepted
Over the last decade the Department and HS2 Ltd have repeatedly said they are learning lessons but there is little evidence that lessons have been applied effectively and mistakes avoided. Since 2013, the Department and HS2 Ltd have told the Committee that they have been learning lessons. This has included …
Read more
Over the last decade the Department and HS2 Ltd have repeatedly said they are learning lessons but there is little evidence that lessons have been applied effectively and mistakes avoided. Since 2013, the Department and HS2 Ltd have told the Committee that they have been learning lessons. This has included areas such as around management of costs and schedule. The Department and HS2 Ltd say that they are still drawing on work already completed on HS2 to learn lessons for future delivery and have worked with HM Treasury and the Infrastructure and Projects Authority to consider all the lessons to date. However, escalating costs, programme delays and rescoping demonstrate that the Department and HS2 Ltd have not implemented these lessons effectively. recommendation Alongside its Treasury Minute response, the Department should write to the committee setting out the key lessons they have drawn and then, in its six–monthly update, explain how those lessons have been put into practice. 8 1 Resetting the HS2 programme Introduction
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government agrees to work with HM Treasury and NISTA to identify and apply key lessons from the HS2 programme during the reset, incorporating findings from the Major Transport Projects Governance and Assurance Review. They will write to the Committee outlining these lessons and provide …
Read full response →
HM Treasury
1
Conclusion
10th Report - HS2: Update following the…
Accepted
On the basis of a report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, we took evidence from the Department for Transport (the Department) and High Speed Two Limited (HS2 Ltd) on the current state of the High Speed Two (HS2) programme.1 The Department is the programme’s sponsor, responsible for funding and …
Read more
On the basis of a report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, we took evidence from the Department for Transport (the Department) and High Speed Two Limited (HS2 Ltd) on the current state of the High Speed Two (HS2) programme.1 The Department is the programme’s sponsor, responsible for funding and overseeing delivery. HS2 Ltd, an arm’s–length body of the department, is responsible for delivering an operational railway.2
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government agrees, stating that work is underway to improve oversight and financial control of HS2, including resetting contracts, launching an independent review, reinstating ministerial oversight, and commissioning a comprehensive review by the new HS2 Ltd CEO. Updates on this work and a detailed plan …
Read full response →
HM Treasury
9
Conclusion
10th Report - HS2: Update following the…
Accepted
We were told by HS2 Ltd that it would take time to implement the changes needed as part of the programme’s fundamental reset, with all of 2025 needed to ensure the organisation’s activities are all orientated towards delivering Phase 1. HS2 Ltd estimated that the reset would not be complete, …
Read more
We were told by HS2 Ltd that it would take time to implement the changes needed as part of the programme’s fundamental reset, with all of 2025 needed to ensure the organisation’s activities are all orientated towards delivering Phase 1. HS2 Ltd estimated that the reset would not be complete, with an “assured contractualised baseline” that can be properly measured against, until mid–2026. The Department also explained that the reset will include a re–evaluation and refreshing of the business case and a revised benefit–cost ratio.15 Revising cost estimates
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government agrees with the committee's observation, stating that work is well underway to improve HS2's oversight and financial control, including making clear that HS2 Ltd and suppliers must reset contracts, launching an independent review, and reinstating ministerial oversight. The CEO has been commissioned to …
Read full response →
HM Treasury
10
Conclusion
10th Report - HS2: Update following the…
Accepted
The Department and HS2 Ltd still disagree on the estimated total costs for completing the programme. Despite using the same data, the Department and HS2 Ltd told us that estimates differ because they disagree over a range of technical factors relating to the methodology used for the estimates and assumptions …
Read more
The Department and HS2 Ltd still disagree on the estimated total costs for completing the programme. Despite using the same data, the Department and HS2 Ltd told us that estimates differ because they disagree over a range of technical factors relating to the methodology used for the estimates and assumptions used, for example over the value of remaining risks on the programme and productivity savings.16 HS2 Ltd also had limited cost information from the supply chain, which reduced its ability to assess which cost increases were necessary.17
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government agrees with the recommendation, stating it has commissioned a comprehensive review of the programme and agreed areas of cost estimation with HS2 Ltd. It is working to finalise the cost estimating methodology over the summer and implement it by 2026, providing further updates …
Read full response →
HM Treasury
11
Conclusion
10th Report - HS2: Update following the…
Accepted
Both the Department and HS2 Ltd told us that they were working together to reach an agreed methodology including drawing on third–party technical advice on cost estimation and, to ensure that the underpinning assumptions of future estimates are agreed, establishing an oversight group with HM Treasury representation.18 The Department expressed …
Read more
Both the Department and HS2 Ltd told us that they were working together to reach an agreed methodology including drawing on third–party technical advice on cost estimation and, to ensure that the underpinning assumptions of future estimates are agreed, establishing an oversight group with HM Treasury representation.18 The Department expressed confidence that there would be agreement on the methodology in the coming two to three months.19
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government agrees with the recommendation, outlining steps to finalise and implement an agreed cost estimating methodology with HS2 Ltd, including a comprehensive review and collaboration with NISTA and HM Treasury, by Spring 2026.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
28
Recommendation
10th Report - HS2: Update following the…
Accepted
The Public Accounts Committee has repeatedly raised concerns over whether the Department and HS2 Ltd have had the necessary skills and capability to deliver HS2 successfully. In 2020 the previous Committee cautioned that it was not yet convinced that the Department and HS2 Ltd had the skills and capability they …
Read more
The Public Accounts Committee has repeatedly raised concerns over whether the Department and HS2 Ltd have had the necessary skills and capability to deliver HS2 successfully. In 2020 the previous Committee cautioned that it was not yet convinced that the Department and HS2 Ltd had the skills and capability they needed either then, now or in the future.46 “In 2013 and 2016, previous Public Accounts Committees identified the challenges the Department has faced in securing the skills it needs for High Speed Two as well as its wider programme portfolio. A lack of capability continues to be an issue [ … ], it still has gaps in key areas such as risk management and assurance, project management and project controls.[ … ]Both organisations will need to ensure that they secure the right skills, at the right time, as the programme progresses.”
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government accepts the recommendation, detailing that the new HS2 Ltd CEO has commenced a comprehensive change programme to enhance skills and capabilities, made executive leadership changes, and the department is undertaking parallel activity. A new Chair is being appointed to review board capability and …
Read full response →
HM Treasury
29
Conclusion
10th Report - HS2: Update following the…
Accepted
HS2 Ltd also acknowledged in evidence to the previous Committee in November 2023 that it that it needed to think about its capacity and capability throughout the company to deliver the task ahead.47 While HS2 Ltd’s focus in recent years has been on civil engineering, it has been 44 Q17; …
Read more
HS2 Ltd also acknowledged in evidence to the previous Committee in November 2023 that it that it needed to think about its capacity and capability throughout the company to deliver the task ahead.47 While HS2 Ltd’s focus in recent years has been on civil engineering, it has been 44 Q17; Letter from HS2 Ltd dated 10 January 2025 45 Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government and Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs, Planning proposals to unblock vital infrastructure and drive nature’s recovery, 22 January 2025 46 Committee of Public Accounts, High Speed 2: Spring 2020 update, Third Report of Session 2019–21, HC 84, 17 May 2020 47 Committee of Public Accounts, HS2 and Euston, Tenth Report of Session 2023–24, HC 67, 7 February 2024 17 shifting its focus to the delivery of railway systems, bringing the railway into operation and managing how it will integrate with the wider railway network. HS2 Ltd began making changes to its organisation in January 2024, including establishing a new role of Chief Railway Officer, with responsibility for integration and focusing programme decisions on how to best deliver the railway, rather than individual component projects.48
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government agrees with the committee's observation, detailing that the new CEO has commenced a comprehensive change programme to reshape HS2 Ltd's capabilities, with a reset program expected to conclude in 2026. Parallel departmental activity, a new Chair appointment to review board capabilities, and new …
Read full response →
HM Treasury
30
Conclusion
10th Report - HS2: Update following the…
Accepted
HS2 Ltd now has new leadership, with Mark Wild appointed as the new Chief Executive Officer and taking up the role in December 2024. He brings his experience of delivering Crossrail into operation and is tasked with delivering the programme’s reset.49 He told us that the three things that he …
Read more
HS2 Ltd now has new leadership, with Mark Wild appointed as the new Chief Executive Officer and taking up the role in December 2024. He brings his experience of delivering Crossrail into operation and is tasked with delivering the programme’s reset.49 He told us that the three things that he needs to do with HS2 Ltd are: reinforce its capability, particularly commercial management in the teams that are managing the contractors, bear down on costs and drive productivity; create an organisation that will operate the railway in the future; and focus HS2 Ltd’s culture on the singular purpose of delivering Phase 1 at the lowest feasible cost.50 The Department also told us that it would expect changes to how it would sponsor and oversee HS2 Ltd following the conclusion of the Major Transport Project Governance and Assurance Review early in 2025.51 48 C&AG’s Report, para 4.4 49 Qq 1–3, 5 50 Qq 42, 71 51 Qq 72–73 18 2 Delivering Euston station
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government agrees with the committee's observation, detailing that the new CEO has commenced a comprehensive change programme, made executive leadership changes, and a new Chair is being appointed to review board capability and fill gaps. New KPIs and a performance-related pay scheme are also …
Read full response →
HM Treasury
36
Conclusion
10th Report - HS2: Update following the…
Accepted
In the 2024 Autumn Budget, the government confirmed that HS2 would terminate at Euston, announcing that it would fund the work to tunnel from Old Oak Common in west London to Euston.61 The previous Public Accounts 57 Qq 78–80 58 Q 47 59 Ibid 60 Qq 45–46 61 HM Treasury, …
Read more
In the 2024 Autumn Budget, the government confirmed that HS2 would terminate at Euston, announcing that it would fund the work to tunnel from Old Oak Common in west London to Euston.61 The previous Public Accounts 57 Qq 78–80 58 Q 47 59 Ibid 60 Qq 45–46 61 HM Treasury, Autumn Budget 2024, 30 October 2024. 20 Committee recommended that a decision on tunnelling was needed urgently to avoid incurring much greater costs from stopping and restarting work.62 The Department was unable to tell us, however, when the station will be completed and in operation.63 In the interim however, when it expects HS2 services to begin operating sometime between 2029 and 2033, trains will terminate at Old Oak Common.64
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government agrees with the committee's observation and commits to providing an update on progress at Euston in its next six-monthly report to Parliament in Summer 2025, and is also responding to a specific letter about the Euston tunnelling schedule.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
37
Conclusion
10th Report - HS2: Update following the…
Accepted
The Department acknowledged that establishing a clearer plan for the works at Euston and implementing it will take over a decade and that there will be continued disruption to local businesses and communities at Euston. The Department committed to provide transparency and engagement with local residents on its plan.65 62 …
Read more
The Department acknowledged that establishing a clearer plan for the works at Euston and implementing it will take over a decade and that there will be continued disruption to local businesses and communities at Euston. The Department committed to provide transparency and engagement with local residents on its plan.65 62 Committee of Public Accounts, HS2 and Euston, Tenth Report of Session 2023–24, HC 67, 7 February 2024 63 Qq 81–86 64 Department for Transport, HS2 6-monthly report to Parliament: December 2024, 17 December 2024 65 Q 51 21 3 Addressing implications of Phase 2 cancellation Disposal of land and property
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government agrees with the committee's observation that it committed to transparency and engagement, and states it will provide an update on progress on Euston in its six-monthly report to Parliament in Summer 2025, as well as responding to a letter regarding the tunnelling schedule.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
38
Conclusion
10th Report - HS2: Update following the…
Accepted
Up to the end of March 2024, HS2 Ltd had spent £3.7 billion on buying land and property along the HS2 route, of which £592 million relates to the cancelled Phase 2.66 The types of land and property include agricultural, commercial and residential, with HS2 Ltd purchasing around a thousand …
Read more
Up to the end of March 2024, HS2 Ltd had spent £3.7 billion on buying land and property along the HS2 route, of which £592 million relates to the cancelled Phase 2.66 The types of land and property include agricultural, commercial and residential, with HS2 Ltd purchasing around a thousand properties and 17 square kilometres of land on the Phase 2 route. HS2 Ltd acts as an agent in purchases and disposals for the Department, with the land and property held as assets of the Department.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government responds to the perceived recommendation by stating that preparatory work for a Phase 2 land disposal programme is underway, which includes a review of the land portfolio and identification of Crichel Down properties. It commits to providing updates on next steps to the …
Read full response →
HM Treasury
39
Recommendation
10th Report - HS2: Update following the…
Accepted
In February 2024, the previous Public Accounts Committee stressed the need for the Department and HS2 Ltd to develop a strategy for the disposal of land and property, and to balance the need for value for money for the taxpayer with the needs of those who have been affected. The …
Read more
In February 2024, the previous Public Accounts Committee stressed the need for the Department and HS2 Ltd to develop a strategy for the disposal of land and property, and to balance the need for value for money for the taxpayer with the needs of those who have been affected. The Committee commented that the Department and HS2 Ltd did not yet know when they would dispose of land and property no longer needed.67 The Department reported in December 2024 that it was developing a programme to dispose of land that is surplus to requirements and has completed a small number of pilot sales.68
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government agrees with the recommendation and states that preparatory work is underway for a Phase 2 land disposal programme, including a portfolio review and identification of Crichel Down properties. It commits to providing updates on next steps to the Committee and in future six-monthly …
Read full response →
HM Treasury
41
Recommendation
10th Report - HS2: Update following the…
Accepted
We pressed the Department to ensure that wherever possible, properties should be offered back to the persons from whom they were purchased, and that requests from people who would like to move back into their former homes be handled sympathetically, given that it can take years for cases to be …
Read more
We pressed the Department to ensure that wherever possible, properties should be offered back to the persons from whom they were purchased, and that requests from people who would like to move back into their former homes be handled sympathetically, given that it can take years for cases to be considered through the Crichel Down rules. We raised the case of properties where decisions were still waiting to be made from earlier changes to the HS2 route, such as around Sheffield which was cancelled in 2021 as part of the Department’s Integrated Rail Plan for the North and Midlands.71
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government agrees with the recommendation and states that preparatory work is underway for a Phase 2 land disposal programme, which includes identifying Crichel Down properties. It commits to confirming next steps to the Committee and providing updates in future reports, while developing a programme …
Read full response →
HM Treasury
42
Conclusion
10th Report - HS2: Update following the…
Accepted
The Department told us that it is obliged to secure value for money for the taxpayer and to follow the Crichel Down rules, which require government departments to offer surplus land back to the previous owner at the current market value. However, the Department acknowledged that the rules need to …
Read more
The Department told us that it is obliged to secure value for money for the taxpayer and to follow the Crichel Down rules, which require government departments to offer surplus land back to the previous owner at the current market value. However, the Department acknowledged that the rules need to be applied in a way that remembers that there are human beings at the end of the process.72 Capacity on West Coast Main Line
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government agrees and is undertaking a review of the Phase 2 land portfolio, including identification of Crichel Down properties, as part of a disposal programme. They will write to the Committee with next steps and include updates in a future six-monthly report by Summer …
Read full response →
HM Treasury
46
Conclusion
10th Report - HS2: Update following the…
Accepted
Since 2013, the Department and HS2 Ltd have told the Public Accounts Committee that they have been learning lessons from other major programmes to apply to how they are managing the HS2 programme. For example, in 2019, the Department and the Infrastructure and Projects Authority published a ‘Lessons for the …
Read more
Since 2013, the Department and HS2 Ltd have told the Public Accounts Committee that they have been learning lessons from other major programmes to apply to how they are managing the HS2 programme. For example, in 2019, the Department and the Infrastructure and Projects Authority published a ‘Lessons for the sponsorship of major projects’ report that drew from the Department’s experiences, and the Department told the previous committee that it was embedding the 24 lessons across its portfolio. It pointed to lessons such as using realistic ranges for costing and schedules rather than fixed points, taking action to reset the programme rather than continuing and hoping it is brought back under control, and using benchmarking to test and assure cost estimates.78 More recently, in November 2023, HS2 Ltd also told the previous committee that it was strengthening its governance, with a particular focus on controlling costs.79
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government agrees with the committee's observation, committing to learning and implementing lessons from the HS2 programme reset and transformation, taking into account future review findings, and sharing lessons across government. The department will write to the Committee outlining key lessons and provide further updates …
Read full response →
HM Treasury
49
Conclusion
10th Report - HS2: Update following the…
Accepted
The Department told us that, together with HS2 Ltd, it has worked with HM Treasury and the Infrastructure and Projects Authority to consider all the lessons to date from the HS2 programme but is continuing to ‘mine’ the lessons learned from HS2. The Department also expects the Major Transport Project …
Read more
The Department told us that, together with HS2 Ltd, it has worked with HM Treasury and the Infrastructure and Projects Authority to consider all the lessons to date from the HS2 programme but is continuing to ‘mine’ the lessons learned from HS2. The Department also expects the Major Transport Project Governance and Assurance Review to identify lessons from the programme.82
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government agrees with the conclusion, committing to identify and apply lessons from the HS2 program during the program reset and transformation of HS2 Ltd. It will outline key lessons to the Committee and provide updates in future Parliamentary reports.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
50
Conclusion
10th Report - HS2: Update following the…
Accepted
The Department reflected that a key lesson from the experience of HS2, and which needs to inform all the Department’s future infrastructure plans, is that the Department needs to be very clear when it sets out on a large project what it is there to achieve. Changing the scope significantly …
Read more
The Department reflected that a key lesson from the experience of HS2, and which needs to inform all the Department’s future infrastructure plans, is that the Department needs to be very clear when it sets out on a large project what it is there to achieve. Changing the scope significantly when a project is already underway has a financial cost to it and the Department told us that the escalation of costs seen with HS2 reflects an obvious lesson of “to have a plan and stick to it.”83
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government agrees with the conclusion, committing to identify and apply lessons from the HS2 program during the program reset and transformation of HS2 Ltd. It will outline key lessons to the Committee and provide updates in future Parliamentary reports.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
51
Conclusion
10th Report - HS2: Update following the…
Accepted
The Department also suggested to us that the delivery of infrastructure has been too focused on “grand projects or big schemes that are binary—you do them or you don’t do them” as opposed to setting a long–term intent and delivering it in smaller incremental stages. The Department explained that in …
Read more
The Department also suggested to us that the delivery of infrastructure has been too focused on “grand projects or big schemes that are binary—you do them or you don’t do them” as opposed to setting a long–term intent and delivering it in smaller incremental stages. The Department explained that in such circumstances it can be easier to commit to each stage, is more controllable as a project, you can learn the lessons from each stage and reapply them to subsequent stages and it is likely to bring passenger benefits and economic benefits sooner, as they are not relying on the whole thing.84 82 Q 63 83 Qq 27, 63 84 Q 64 26
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government agrees with the conclusion, committing to identify and apply lessons from the HS2 program regarding project delivery approaches during the program reset and transformation of HS2 Ltd. It will outline key lessons to the Committee and provide updates in future Parliamentary reports.
Read full response →
HM Treasury