Recommendations & Conclusions
8 items
1
Conclusion
4th Report - Covid-19 and the criminal …
Not Addressed
In considering the Government’s approach to its use of the criminal law during the covid-19 pandemic we recognise that the Government was required to act in exceptional circumstances and to respond to a public health emergency of a scale not seen in recent times. We therefore give credit to the …
Read more
In considering the Government’s approach to its use of the criminal law during the covid-19 pandemic we recognise that the Government was required to act in exceptional circumstances and to respond to a public health emergency of a scale not seen in recent times. We therefore give credit to the Government and all those involved in developing and enforcing covid-19 offences in such difficult and unpredictable circumstances. The creation and enforcement of these offences played an important part in protecting the public.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government reiterated its general actions and challenges faced during the pandemic in protecting public health and livelihoods, without specifically engaging with the committee's expression of credit for their efforts.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
2
Conclusion
4th Report - Covid-19 and the criminal …
Not Addressed
The Government’s first priority must be to protect public health and save lives. The Government should be commended for moving to strike a difficult balance between the need to provide police forces with tools to enforce the rules without criminalising behaviour in ways incompatible with the fundamental values of our …
Read more
The Government’s first priority must be to protect public health and save lives. The Government should be commended for moving to strike a difficult balance between the need to provide police forces with tools to enforce the rules without criminalising behaviour in ways incompatible with the fundamental values of our society.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government reiterated its general actions and challenges faced during the pandemic in protecting public health and livelihoods, without specifically engaging with the committee's commendation for striking a difficult balance.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
4
Recommendation
4th Report - Covid-19 and the criminal …
Not Addressed
At the time of publication of this report, we recognise that almost of all of the covid-19 restrictions we refer to are no longer in force. However, should the covid-19 situation worsen again, and restrictions need to be reintroduced, we would urge the Government to act in line with the …
Read more
At the time of publication of this report, we recognise that almost of all of the covid-19 restrictions we refer to are no longer in force. However, should the covid-19 situation worsen again, and restrictions need to be reintroduced, we would urge the Government to act in line with the principles embodied in the conclusions of this report and with the lessons learnt. (Paragraph 8) Creating covid-19 offences
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government outlines its future strategy for managing COVID-19, focusing on removing restrictions, pharmaceutical capabilities, and maintaining resilience, but does not explicitly commit to acting in line with the specific principles and lessons learned from the committee's report.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
11
Conclusion
4th Report - Covid-19 and the criminal …
Not Addressed
Parliament has a responsibility to ensure that any criminalisation has democratic legitimacy. Legitimacy is vital when widespread curtailment of civil liberties is at stake and the risk of people ignoring the rules owing to low risk of detection is high.
Read more
Parliament has a responsibility to ensure that any criminalisation has democratic legitimacy. Legitimacy is vital when widespread curtailment of civil liberties is at stake and the risk of people ignoring the rules owing to low risk of detection is high.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government response broadly describes its actions during the pandemic but does not specifically address the committee's observation regarding Parliament's responsibility for ensuring democratic legitimacy in criminalisation.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
23
Recommendation
4th Report - Covid-19 and the criminal …
Not Addressed
The Government should conduct a review of fixed penalty notices for covid-19 offences. The review should consider: • how effective the fixed penalty notice scheme has been for delivering public compliance; • what alternative options there might be for enforcing public health restrictions during a pandemic; and • whether the …
Read more
The Government should conduct a review of fixed penalty notices for covid-19 offences. The review should consider: • how effective the fixed penalty notice scheme has been for delivering public compliance; • what alternative options there might be for enforcing public health restrictions during a pandemic; and • whether the use of fixed penalty notices should be limited to certain types of offences in the future. These terms of reference could be considered as part of our suggested review by the UKHSA.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government repeated the committee's recommendation for a review of fixed penalty notices for COVID-19 offences but did not explicitly commit to conducting such a review. Instead, it described the existing policing approach and the role of FPNs during the pandemic.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
24
Conclusion
4th Report - Covid-19 and the criminal …
Not Addressed
The high error rate of charges brought under the Coronavirus Act and the public health regulations illustrates the importance of the need for future pandemic planning to consider the role of the criminal law. (Paragraph 68) 36 Covid-19 and the criminal law
Read more
The high error rate of charges brought under the Coronavirus Act and the public health regulations illustrates the importance of the need for future pandemic planning to consider the role of the criminal law. (Paragraph 68) 36 Covid-19 and the criminal law
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges regrettable charging errors under the Coronavirus Act, explaining the CPS is conducting an ongoing review of finalised cases and found the overall error rate was not unduly high. However, it does not explicitly state how this will inform future pandemic planning regarding …
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
29
Recommendation
4th Report - Covid-19 and the criminal …
Not Addressed
For covid-19 related offences a recipient of a fixed penalty notice, who does not pay the fine within 28 days should be told promptly if a police force decides not to charge. A recipient of a fixed penalty notice should also be told when the limitation period for prosecution will …
Read more
For covid-19 related offences a recipient of a fixed penalty notice, who does not pay the fine within 28 days should be told promptly if a police force decides not to charge. A recipient of a fixed penalty notice should also be told when the limitation period for prosecution will expire.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government response does not address the recommendation, instead discussing the scrutiny of secondary legislation and the challenges of legislating for COVID-19 at an exceptional pace.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
31
Conclusion
4th Report - Covid-19 and the criminal …
Not Addressed
A central lesson from the covid-19 pandemic is the enduring impact that pandemics can have on our criminal justice system and courts. In response to the pandemic the Government was right to look for ways to reduce pressure on the courts system and to avoid overwhelming the magistrates’ courts with …
Read more
A central lesson from the covid-19 pandemic is the enduring impact that pandemics can have on our criminal justice system and courts. In response to the pandemic the Government was right to look for ways to reduce pressure on the courts system and to avoid overwhelming the magistrates’ courts with covid-19 related cases. We recognise that the efficiency of the single justice procedure had a role to play in this.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government's response outlines existing provisions for media access and transparency in Single Justice Procedure (SJP) cases, stating the Ministry of Justice does not agree with an unstated recommendation related to the report, but assures continued work with the media.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice