Select Committee · Work and Pensions Committee

Children in poverty: Child Maintenance Service

Status: Closed Opened: 18 May 2022 Closed: 31 Oct 2023 16 recommendations 15 conclusions 1 report

Children in poverty: Child Maintenance Service is the third and final part of the Committee’s wider inquiry into children in poverty, following on from the Measurement and targets , and no recourse to public funds . The Committee looked into: How many children in the UK live in separated families? What proportion of these children …

Clear

Reports

1 report
Title HC No. Published Items Response
Sixth Report - Children in poverty: Child Maintenance Servi… HC 272 27 Apr 2023 31 Responded

Recommendations & Conclusions

4 items
6 Conclusion Sixth Report - Children in poverty: Chi… Rejected

Provide receiving parents with illustrative evidence list and guidance for FIU referrals.

The Department’s own assessment to the NAO “that around 50% of fraud referrals to its Financial Investigations Unit are unfounded” indicates that the system is not functioning as it should be, and, as we will return to later, demonstrates how conflict is encouraged. The Department currently requires evidence for referrals …

Government response. The government disagreed with the committee's assessment that the Financial Investigation Unit referral system is not functioning correctly. While it continues to enhance its fraud strategy and noted a high percentage of investigations result in assessment changes, it only committed …
Department for Work and Pensions
10 Recommendation Sixth Report - Children in poverty: Chi… Rejected

Revise Universal Credit deduction priority list to place child maintenance above government debt.

Child maintenance currently ranks low on the priority list for Universal Credit deductions at twelfth, below deductions for DWP debt, such as advance payments. We disagree that pursuing such debt should hold a higher priority than child maintenance. Deductions for child maintenance should take higher priority than deductions for the …

Government response. The government rejected the recommendation to reprioritise child maintenance deductions above government debt. It stated that child maintenance is already considered before other government debts like benefit overpayments and there are no current plans to alter the existing deduction priority …
Department for Work and Pensions
21 Conclusion Sixth Report - Children in poverty: Chi… Rejected

Child benefit splitting for parents with shared care is currently impossible and needed.

Presently it is not possible for child benefit to be split between parents, even in cases of equally shared care. The Department should work with HMRC to enable parents with shared care to split child benefit between them.

Government response. The government rejected the recommendation to enable splitting child benefit between parents with shared care. It argued that existing measures provide appropriate support and that splitting payments would introduce additional operational burdens, complexity for claimants, and costs for the Exchequer.
Department for Work and Pensions
24 Recommendation Sixth Report - Children in poverty: Chi… Rejected

Introduce means-testing system for Collect and Pay fees for low-income parents.

We have heard evidence that was strongly critical of the effectiveness of Collect and Pay fees. Such fees are particularly pernicious for parents on low incomes and we recommend that the Government should introduce a system for the means-testing of Collect and Pay fees.

Government response. The government rejects means-testing Collect and Pay fees, stating that charges are the right approach to encourage parents to use direct pay arrangements. It believes means-testing could create perverse incentives and add complexity to the system.
Department for Work and Pensions

Oral evidence sessions

4 sessions
Date Witnesses
18 Jan 2023 Arlene Sugden · Department for Work and Pensions, Hilda Massey · Department for Work and Pensions, Viscount Younger of Leckie · Department for Work and Pensions View ↗
2 Nov 2022 Joshua Reddaway · National Audit Office View ↗
19 Oct 2022 Dr Christine Davies · Royal Holloway University of London, Dr Jon Symonds · University of Bristol, Dr Mia Hakovirta · Turku University, Finland, Professor Esther Dermott · University of Bristol View ↗
7 Sep 2022 Caitlin Logan · One Parent Families Scotland, Cristina Odone · Centre for Social Justice, Meghan Meek-O’Connor · Save the Children, Michael Lewkowicz · Families Need Fathers, Victoria Benson · Gingerbread View ↗

Correspondence

4 letters
DateDirectionTitle
6 Sep 2023 Correspondence with the Parliamentary Under Secretary of State relating to Chil…
13 Jul 2023 Correspondence with Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State relating to Children…
23 Feb 2023 Correspondence with the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State relating to Chil…
1 Feb 2023 Correspondence with the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State about the Childr…