Select Committee · Treasury Committee

SME Finance

Status: Closed Opened: 29 Jun 2023 Closed: 28 May 2024 5 recommendations 17 conclusions 1 report

In this inquiry, the Treasury Committee will examine the accessibility of finance and lending to SMEs, by considering the key challenges SMEs face when seeking finance, the regulation of SME lending and the role Government can play in enhancing lending to SMEs. Read the call for evidence to find out more about the inquiry

Reports

1 report
Title HC No. Published Items Response
Eighth Report - SME Finance HC 27 8 May 2024 22 Responded

Recommendations & Conclusions

22 items
1 Conclusion Eighth Report - SME Finance Accepted

SMEs face narrow access to finance, rising costs, and apathy about seeking funds

Small and medium-sized enterprises make a large contribution to the UK economy, accounting for over half of total business employment and turnover. SMEs are struggling with narrow access to finance in the face of rising cost pressures and higher interest rates and are generally pessimistic about their ability to raise …

Government response. The government welcomes the report on SME finance, recognising their significant contribution and challenges, and commits to a range of actions including launching consultations by Spring 2025, extending the SME Digital Adoption Taskforce, announcing a £4m pilot package for tech …
HM Treasury
2 Conclusion Eighth Report - SME Finance Acknowledged

Removal of Basel 3.1 SME supporting factor threatens UK SME finance market

The removal of the SME supporting factor under Basel 3.1 threatens to undermine the UK’s SME finance market by increasing capital requirements on lenders to SMEs. This will drive up the cost of finance for SMEs and may restrict the supply of lending as banks shift their loans away from …

Government response. The government acknowledged the Committee’s concerns regarding the removal of the SME supporting factor under Basel 3.1 but made no specific commitments to action.
HM Treasury
3 Conclusion Eighth Report - SME Finance Acknowledged

Ensure Basel 3.1 implementation does not increase SME lending capital requirements or harm competitiveness

The PRA must ensure that the final implementation of the Basel 3.1 standards leaves capital requirements on SME lending no more stringent than they are under the current system and that international competitiveness with the EU and the US is not harmed. (Paragraph 26) Dispute resolution

Government response. The government acknowledges the Committee’s concerns regarding the removal of the SME supporting factor under Basel 3.1 but provides no commitment to action.
HM Treasury
4 Conclusion Eighth Report - SME Finance Acknowledged

Financial Ombudsman Service capacity for complex SME banking disputes remains a concern

We support the Financial Ombudsman Service in its role as the primary mechanism for SME banking disputes. We note concerns that the FOS is primarily equipped to deal with less complex cases but note the efforts undertaken by the organisation to improve specialist resource.

Government response. The government supports the FOS's role, noting its ongoing programme to improve service following a 2021 review, and commits to continuing regular engagement with the FOS to address operational issues and ensure aligned rules.
HM Treasury
5 Recommendation Eighth Report - SME Finance Accepted

Continue dialogue with FOS and review resourcing to serve the SME community

HM Treasury and the FCA should continue their dialogue with the FOS and keep resourcing under active review, to ensure that it has the prerequisite capacity and capability to serve the majority of the SME community.

Government response. The government accepts the recommendation, stating it will continue engagement with the FCA and FOS, addressing relevant resourcing issues, and aligning FOS rules. It also outlines broader measures announced by the Chancellor to modernise the FOS framework and improve its …
HM Treasury
6 Conclusion Eighth Report - SME Finance Deferred

Business Banking Resolution Service eligibility criteria and limited scope restrict effectiveness

The BBRS has seen a far smaller number of cases than some expected. This could be due to low demand, but is also likely to be due to the nature of the eligibility criteria attached to it, as shown by the rejection rate of cases. In the best-case scenario, the …

Government response. The government notes the committee's conclusions and the BBRS's decision to close, stating that further decisions about the service are a matter for the independent BBRS in discussion with relevant parties.
HM Treasury
7 Conclusion Eighth Report - SME Finance Not Addressed

Business Banking Resolution Service lacks perceived independence from the financial industry

There is no clear evidence that the seven participating banks control the BBRS on an operational level. However, the structure and remit of the BBRS were determined with their consent. Dispute resolution must be independent, and perhaps as importantly, be seen to be independent of the financial services industry. Despite …

Government response. The government notes the committee's conclusion regarding the Business Banking Resolution Service's (BBRS) perceived lack of independence, and states that the BBRS will close to new registrations on 13 December 2024, with its future being a matter for the BBRS …
HM Treasury
8 Conclusion Eighth Report - SME Finance Deferred

Close the Business Banking Resolution Service as it is not fit for purpose

The BBRS is not fit for purpose in providing alternative dispute resolution to the 55,000 SMEs who fall outside of the FOS’ thresholds and this service should close as originally planned.

Government response. The government did not address the recommendation to close the BBRS, instead highlighting the role and importance of the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) for dispute resolution.
HM Treasury
9 Conclusion Eighth Report - SME Finance Acknowledged

Find replacement dispute resolution for FOS-ineligible SMEs and consult by year end 2024

HM Treasury must find a way to continue to meet the dispute resolution needs of those SMEs ineligible for FOS access (including considering whether the FCA was correct in assuming that expanding the FOS’ thresholds would be a disproportionate cost). A consultation on a replacement mechanism must take place by …

Government response. The government generally supports the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) and describes its important role in resolving disputes, but does not commit to finding a new mechanism for ineligible SMEs or consulting on a replacement.
HM Treasury
10 Recommendation Eighth Report - SME Finance Accepted

Continue active review of FOS resourcing to ensure SME community capacity

HM Treasury and the FCA should also continue to the keep resourcing of the FOS under active review to ensure that it has the prerequisite capacity and capability to serve the majority of the SME community. (Paragraph 62) Business debanking

Government response. The government commits to continuing engagement with the FCA and FOS to address resourcing issues, referencing a package of measures announced at Mansion House, including a Call for Input, an updated Memorandum of Understanding, and a strengthened Wider Implication Framework …
HM Treasury
11 Conclusion Eighth Report - SME Finance Accepted

SME bank account closures for 'risk appetite' reasons lack transparency and consistency

Any SME with a legal business should be able to access a bank account. Banks may need to close business accounts because of regulatory requirements and concerns around financial crime, but thousands of accounts are being closed for vaguely defined reasons relating to “risk appetite” or “reputational risk”. What qualifies …

Government response. The government agrees that account closure requirements need improving and intends to bring forward legislation to ensure customers receive detailed explanations and longer notice periods when accounts are closed, except in financial crime situations.
HM Treasury
12 Conclusion Eighth Report - SME Finance Acknowledged

Publish clear instructions by Q3 2024 on permissible use of 'risk appetite' criteria

The FCA should continue their work into better understanding how financial institutions are using criteria like “reputational risk” or “risk appetite” and report their findings by the end of Q2 2024. It is essential that the FCA publish clear instructions by Q3 2024 to the market about how such criteria …

Government response. The government stated its commitment to ensuring SMEs have appropriate access to redress and proportionate regulation but did not commit to the specific actions or timelines recommended for the FCA or HM Treasury.
HM Treasury
13 Recommendation Eighth Report - SME Finance Acknowledged

Require banks to submit quarterly data on business account closures and publish aggregated forms.

The FCA should also require banks to submit quarterly data on business account closures to assist their wider review. The FCA should publish an aggregated form of this data on a periodic basis to improve transparency over business debanking and allow SMEs to make informed decisions on their choice of …

Government response. The government states a general commitment to ensuring SMEs have appropriate access to redress and proportionate regulation, but provides no specific actions regarding data collection or publication as recommended.
HM Treasury
14 Conclusion Eighth Report - SME Finance Acknowledged

Introduce new regulations on business debanking transparency before the parliamentary summer recess.

We welcome the Treasury’s proposed rules changes on debanking, which will provide a greater deal of transparency to customers who suffer from an account closure. HM Treasury should introduce these regulations before the parliamentary summer recess,

Government response. The government expresses a general commitment to ensuring SMEs have appropriate access to redress and proportionate regulation, but does not specify action to introduce the proposed debanking regulations before the parliamentary summer recess.
HM Treasury
15 Conclusion Eighth Report - SME Finance Acknowledged

British Business Bank praised for SME support, but greater engagement required.

We commend the British Business Bank for its role in providing support to SMEs. We would like to see more smaller businesses visiting the Finance Hub and making use of its resources, as well as wider BBB programmes.

Government response. The government agrees on the British Business Bank's important role in supporting SMEs and expresses a shared desire for more SMEs to utilise its Finance Hub, committing to work with the BBB to improve access to finance through targeted interventions.
HM Treasury
16 Recommendation Eighth Report - SME Finance Accepted

Consult with BBB to raise awareness and implement annual criteria for assessing SME engagement.

Government, including HM Treasury and the Department for Business and Trade, should consult with the BBB on an ongoing basis to ensure that everything possible is being done to raise awareness and increase engagement from the SME community. This should include assessing whether the BBB has sufficient resources to publicise …

Government response. The government agrees with the recommendation and commits to working with the British Business Bank (BBB) to improve SME access to finance, providing over £1 billion in funding for the BBB. It notes that the BBB has already published an …
HM Treasury
17 Conclusion Eighth Report - SME Finance Deferred

Recovery Loan Scheme successful, with welcome extension and rebranding to Growth Guarantee Scheme.

The Recovery Loan Scheme appears to have been successful in supporting SMEs with access to finance throughout the pandemic and beyond. We welcome HM Treasury’s decision to extend and rebrand it into a “Growth Guarantee Scheme”, which can provide support to many more businesses seeking to access finance in the …

Government response. The government responded with a general statement about the importance of banking services and financial inclusion, rather than directly acknowledging the Committee's welcome for the new Growth Guarantee Scheme.
HM Treasury
18 Conclusion Eighth Report - SME Finance Acknowledged

Consult on making the Growth Guarantee Scheme permanent to provide foundational SME finance support.

HM Treasury and the BBB should consult on the merits of making the Growth Guarantee Scheme permanent, in order to provide a foundational support programme, which can be scaled up appropriately in a crisis. This would build long term security in the accessibility of finance for the SME population and …

Government response. The government states a general commitment to high standards of protection and financial inclusion in the banking sector, but does not address consulting on making the Growth Guarantee Scheme permanent.
HM Treasury
19 Conclusion Eighth Report - SME Finance Acknowledged

Disproportionate personal guarantees may reduce SME finance access; support FCA investigation within current remit.

Disproportionate use of personal guarantees may be a factor in driving down access to finance, either owing to lack of collateral or simple risk aversion from businesses who do not wish to take them out. We support the FCA’s investigation into the fair and proportionate use of personal guarantees that …

Government response. The government provides a general statement of commitment to high standards of protection and financial inclusion, without specifically addressing the FCA's investigation into personal guarantees or its remit.
HM Treasury
20 Conclusion Eighth Report - SME Finance Deferred

FOS remit for business lending personal guarantees reveals an unfair, inconsistent support gap.

We agree with the FOS that the current approach to personal guarantees on business lending represents a gap in its remit that fails to provide the kind of support to 38 SME Finance SMEs that the service exists for. The fact that the FOS cannot assist business owners or directors …

Government response. The government notes that the committee's conclusion regarding the FOS's inconsistent support for SMEs on personal guarantees is primarily for the independent Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) to consider.
HM Treasury
21 Recommendation Eighth Report - SME Finance Deferred

Provide FOS with powers to address SME personal guarantees and investigate other identified remit gaps.

The FCA should provide the FOS with the necessary powers to address personal guarantees for SMEs, so that their service is consistent with consumers. The FCA should also investigate widening the FOS’s remit to cover the other gaps they identified and keep the Committee informed of their conclusions.

Government response. The government notes these recommendations for widening FOS powers regarding personal guarantees for SMEs and investigating other gaps are primarily intended for the independent Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) to consider.
HM Treasury
22 Conclusion Eighth Report - SME Finance Deferred

Unfair use of personal guarantees constrains growth and investment for SMEs.

Unfair use of personal guarantees has the potential to constrain growth and investment for SMEs, particularly the smallest businesses. We welcome HM Treasury’s review on this matter, and look forward to seeing what it will do to ease the burden on the smallest businesses. (Paragraph 113) SME Finance 39

Government response. The government completely changed the subject, welcoming the FCA's work on bank account rejections and closures and generally discussing access to banking services, instead of addressing the recommendation about personal guarantees for SMEs.
HM Treasury

Correspondence

5 letters
DateDirectionTitle
24 Apr 2024 Correspondence between the Financial Ombudsman Service and the Financial Conduc…
28 Feb 2024 Letters from Barclays, HSBC, TSB, Lloyds, Santander, NatWest, Metro, Handelsban…
28 Feb 2024 Letters from the Chair to Barclays, HSBC, TSB, Lloyds, Santander, NatWest, Metr…
27 Feb 2024 To cttee Letter from Louis Taylor, Chief Executive, British Business Bank, following ora…
27 Feb 2024 To cttee Letter from Mark Grimshaw, British Banking Resolution Service, following oral e…