Select committee: Transport Committee

Recommendation 10

Third Report - Rollout and safety of smart motorways Published 2 Nov 2021 Paragraph 45 Addressed to Department for Transport
Recommendation (the committee's words)
Controlled motorways, which retain the hard shoulder and have technology to regulate traffic, have the lowest casualty rates of all types of motorway on the Strategic Road Network. The Department and National Highways should revisit the case for controlled motorways. The Department should set out how the business case for controlled motorways compares with that for all-lane running motorways.

From: Transport Committee, Third Report - Rollout and safety of smart motorways (HC 26), paragraph 45, 2 November 2021

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 12 January 2022 (deadline 10 January 2022).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government states it will be "taking forward all the recommendations", including pausing the rollout of future all lane running smart motorway schemes, while disagreeing with the Committee's view that the March 2020 decision was premature.

  • It does "not agree" that the March 2020 decision that all new smart motorways would be ALRs was premature, nor that introducing ALR smart motorways was an unsafe change.
  • It agrees to "immediately pause" ALR schemes yet to commence construction until five years of safety data is available, but will complete schemes already in construction, which are "all over 50% complete".
  • On retrofitting emergency areas, it "agrees in principle" and commits £390m over the second Road Investment Strategy, for over 150 additional emergency areas by 2025. Wider retrofitting will be "considered" for the third Road Investment Strategy.
  • On an ORR health and safety assessment, it commits only to "investigating further" the benefits, with recommendations to ministers "later this year", noting this may need legislation and consultation.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error