Select Committee · Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee

Ministerial Statements and the Ministerial Code

Status: Open Opened: 12 Jun 2025 11 recommendations 18 conclusions 1 report

This inquiry will consider whether the Ministerial Code adequately sets out what the House should expect of Ministers making the most important announcements of government policy. We will ask whether those requirements are observed with sufficient rigour by Ministers. Additionally, we will consider the appropriate balance in deciding between a written or oral statement. Read … Show more

Clear

Reports

1 report
Title HC No. Published Items Response
4th Report - Ministerial Statements and the Ministerial Code HC 1036 9 Jan 2026 29 Responded

Recommendations & Conclusions

5 items
6 Conclusion 4th Report - Ministerial Statements and… Accepted in Part

House considered 'in session' outside recess, acknowledging ongoing government business

We consider the House to be ‘in session’ at all times outside of recess, prorogation and dissolution, not just when it is sitting. It is accepted that the business of government continues during recess and ministers will need to respond to events. (Conclusion, Paragraph 24) Read more

Government response AI summary
The government explicitly states it "partially accepts" the recommendation and agrees with the Committee's definition of 'in session'. While committing to keep the House informed through various channels during recess, it acknowledges that notifying the House first is not always possible.
Read full response →
7 Recommendation 4th Report - Ministerial Statements and… Accepted in Part

Restrict major policy announcements when Parliament is not sitting to exceptional circumstances.

However, major planned policy announcements when the House is not in session should be restricted to those which are time sensitive or otherwise exceptional. Where it is necessary to make a major announcement when the House is in session but not sitting then a minister should come to the House … Read more

Government response AI summary
The government partially accepts this recommendation, agreeing with the committee's definition of 'in session' and committing to ensuring announcement details are made available to the House at the earliest opportunity through statements or letters. However, they maintain it is not always possible to notify the …
Read full response →
13 Recommendation 4th Report - Ministerial Statements and… Accepted in Part

Comply with the Ministerial Code or substantially re-write it in consultation with Parliament.

The responsibility for complying with the Code rests with the Government. The Government should either make every effort to comply with the Code, or to re-write it. Although it is the Prime Minister’s document, we expect that any substantial re-writing of the Code in this area should be done in … Read more

Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges concerns and commits to updating the language of the Ministerial Code, while reasserting that the Code's content is ultimately a matter for the Prime Minister, but also commits to working constructively with Members.
Read full response →
15 Recommendation 4th Report - Ministerial Statements and… Accepted in Part

Require ministers to explain reasons for breaching 'Parliament first' principle at earliest opportunity.

Where an exceptional circumstance does arise and a major policy is announced first elsewhere, a minister must, as a sign of respect towards Parliament, make a statement to the House at the earliest opportunity, which would include the reasons for breaching the general principle. (Recommendation, Paragraph 44) Practice during this … Read more

Government response AI summary
The government partially accepts, committing to ensuring announcement details are made available to the House at the earliest appropriate opportunity when exceptions arise. However, it does not explicitly commit to including reasons for breaching the general principle in such statements.
Read full response →
26 Recommendation 4th Report - Ministerial Statements and… Accepted in Part

Government commitment to Ministerial Code best addresses breaches and parliamentary dissatisfaction

An active commitment from the Government to adhere to the Ministerial Code and the ‘Parliament first’ principle is the easiest and most optimal solution to address the dissatisfaction of Parliament and the subsequent question of what constitutes adequate sanctions for breaches. Alternatively, the Government could, in consultation with Members across … Read more

Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges concerns about the Ministerial Code and commits to updating its language, while reaffirming that the Code's content remains a matter for the Prime Minister. They also express commitment to constructive work with Members to ensure changes support parliamentary scrutiny.
Read full response →

Oral evidence sessions

2 sessions
Date Witnesses
3 Sep 2025 Rt Hon Jesse Norman MP · Department for Transport, Rt Hon Jesse Norman MP View ↗
16 Jul 2025 Rt Hon Jesse Norman MP · Department for Transport, Rt Hon Jesse Norman MP, Rt Hon Lucy Powell MP View ↗

Who gave evidence

3 witnesses
WitnessOrganisationSessions
Rt Hon Jesse Norman MP Department for Transport 2
Rt Hon Jesse Norman MP 2
Rt Hon Lucy Powell MP 1

Correspondence

3 letters
DateDirectionTitle
15 Jul 2025 From cttee Letter to Sir Laurie Magnus CBE, Independent Adviser on Ministerial Standards o…
8 Jul 2025 To cttee Letter from Sir Laurie Magnus CBE, Independent Adviser on Ministerial Standards…
12 Jun 2025 To cttee Letter from the Speaker of the House of Commons on Paragraph 9.1 of the Ministe…