Recommendations & Conclusions
8 items
1
Recommendation
Third Report: Addressing the Legacy of …
Acknowledged
We are disappointed that the UK Government has decided not to submit, to date, written evidence to our inquiry, but we look forward to receiving it, just as we would look forward to formal submissions from the Irish Government. In addition, the planned oral evidence session with the Secretary of …
Read more
We are disappointed that the UK Government has decided not to submit, to date, written evidence to our inquiry, but we look forward to receiving it, just as we would look forward to formal submissions from the Irish Government. In addition, the planned oral evidence session with the Secretary of State was postponed at the request of the Government. This Report is necessarily an Interim Report, in which we set out our recommendations and conclusions with a view to informing the future policy. We hope that the Government will use its response to this Interim Report to address the outstanding questions in this policy area and keep in mind the principles of the Stormont House Agreement and New Decade, New Approach.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government thanked the committee for its work and stated it would continue to take its contributions into account as legacy reform remains an ongoing matter of sensitive policy development, but did not address the specific outstanding questions requested.
Read full response →
Northern Ireland Executive
Northern Ireland Office
2
Conclusion
Third Report: Addressing the Legacy of …
Acknowledged
Too many key questions remain regarding how the proposed new institution would operate and function. It is deeply worrying that since 18 March, when the Government announced its new legacy proposals, it has been unable to provide any further policy detail. While covid-19 has presented a challenge across government, policy …
Read more
Too many key questions remain regarding how the proposed new institution would operate and function. It is deeply worrying that since 18 March, when the Government announced its new legacy proposals, it has been unable to provide any further policy detail. While covid-19 has presented a challenge across government, policy development has continued across Whitehall, and the Northern Ireland Office has digital platforms to facilitate its work. The information lacuna is especially regrettable given the sensitivity of the issues and the period since many of the events occurred. Delay and uncertainty perpetuate an unacceptable situation that has already gone on too long. (Paragraph 6) Stormont House Agreement
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government thanked the committee for its report and stated that legacy reform remains an ongoing matter of sensitive policy development and engagement, without addressing the specific concerns about the lack of policy detail or delay.
Read full response →
Northern Ireland Executive
Northern Ireland Office
3
Recommendation
Third Report: Addressing the Legacy of …
Acknowledged
The Committee welcome the Government’s desire to legislate to address the legacy of the past in Northern Ireland. Our predecessor Committee’s inquiry in the previous Parliament identified flaws in the draft Bill which would have prevented its receiving broad support in Northern Ireland. However, the new proposals represent a unilateral …
Read more
The Committee welcome the Government’s desire to legislate to address the legacy of the past in Northern Ireland. Our predecessor Committee’s inquiry in the previous Parliament identified flaws in the draft Bill which would have prevented its receiving broad support in Northern Ireland. However, the new proposals represent a unilateral and unhelpful departure from the Stormont House Agreement rather than positive and progressive evolution. The Government must, as soon as possible, introduce legislation that is consistent with the six principles of the Stormont House Agreement: • promoting reconciliation; • upholding the rule of law; • acknowledging and addressing the suffering of victims and survivors; • facilitating the pursuit of justice and information recovery; • complying with human rights; and • being balanced, proportionate, transparent, fair and equitable.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government thanked the committee and stated it would continue to take contributions into account as it moves forward with legacy commitments, noting that reform is an ongoing matter of policy development, without committing to introducing legislation consistent with the Stormont House Agreement.
Read full response →
Northern Ireland Executive
Northern Ireland Office
4
Recommendation
Third Report: Addressing the Legacy of …
Acknowledged
The Irish Government will have a role to play in parts of a new legacy process. It will need to maintain a collaborative approach to help resolve legacy cases, which we 26 Addressing the Legacy of Northern Ireland’s Past: the Government’s New Proposals (Interim Report) heard has not always been …
Read more
The Irish Government will have a role to play in parts of a new legacy process. It will need to maintain a collaborative approach to help resolve legacy cases, which we 26 Addressing the Legacy of Northern Ireland’s Past: the Government’s New Proposals (Interim Report) heard has not always been the case in the past. That will best be achieved by the UK Government adopting a policy of meaningful and appropriate engagement with the Irish Government as envisaged in the Stormont House Agreement.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government reaffirmed its strong commitment to working in partnership with the Irish Government on legacy issues, aligning with the recommendation for meaningful engagement.
Read full response →
Northern Ireland Executive
Northern Ireland Office
9
Recommendation
Third Report: Addressing the Legacy of …
Acknowledged
The permanent closure of a case in which a serious crime has been committed raises profound legal, ethical and human rights issues. There is considerable doubt whether such closures are the right approach. Before the Government introduces legislation, it must clarify its policy on: a) whether cases could be reopened …
Read more
The permanent closure of a case in which a serious crime has been committed raises profound legal, ethical and human rights issues. There is considerable doubt whether such closures are the right approach. Before the Government introduces legislation, it must clarify its policy on: a) whether cases could be reopened if new, compelling evidence comes to light; Addressing the Legacy of Northern Ireland’s Past: 27 the Government’s New Proposals (Interim Report) b) what would happen to evidence and files in cases that are permanently closed; c) whether decisions on case closure would be subject to a right of appeal; d) what practical actions “swift final examinations” would entail; e) who would be responsible for making decisions on which cases merit a full police investigation; f) whether the new body would be responsible for undertaking such investigations; and g) how to ensure that bodies that hold information do not simply run down the clock by withholding material.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledged the committee's contributions, stating that legacy reform is an ongoing matter of sensitive policy development and engagement, but did not provide the specific policy clarifications requested.
Read full response →
Northern Ireland Executive
Northern Ireland Office
11
Recommendation
Third Report: Addressing the Legacy of …
Acknowledged
We expect the Government to abide by its obligations under the ECHR to ensure that investigations conducted by the new legacy body are Article 2 compliant. Victims and families will be failed by a process that results in legal challenge and further delay. This will cause frustration to those who …
Read more
We expect the Government to abide by its obligations under the ECHR to ensure that investigations conducted by the new legacy body are Article 2 compliant. Victims and families will be failed by a process that results in legal challenge and further delay. This will cause frustration to those who have already waited too long to find out what happened to their loved ones. In setting up any legacy institution, the Government must publish guidelines setting out the steps the body and its staff will take to ensure that its investigations are ECHR compliant. (Paragraph 42) Information recovery
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government broadly acknowledged the committee's contributions and reaffirmed its commitment to dealing with the legacy of the Troubles, but did not specifically commit to ensuring ECHR Article 2 compliance for investigations or publishing related guidelines.
Read full response →
Northern Ireland Executive
Northern Ireland Office
12
Conclusion
Third Report: Addressing the Legacy of …
Acknowledged
The Government is right to recognise the importance of providing families that seek it with as much information as possible about the death of a loved one. Many families seek not redress, but merely to be treated with respect and to obtain information. Unfortunately, the WMS did not explain the …
Read more
The Government is right to recognise the importance of providing families that seek it with as much information as possible about the death of a loved one. Many families seek not redress, but merely to be treated with respect and to obtain information. Unfortunately, the WMS did not explain the operation of the proposed information recovery mechanism and the intervening period of radio silence has been thoroughly unhelpful.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government welcomed the committee's conclusion that providing families with information is important and confirmed that information recovery is central to any new legacy system.
Read full response →
Northern Ireland Executive
Northern Ireland Office
14
Recommendation
Third Report: Addressing the Legacy of …
Acknowledged
Any new legacy process must command the trust and confidence of those engaging with it. Although no scheme will ever command universal support, the Government must have at the heart of its thinking the objective of maximising trust across the traditions and ensuring full compliance with all legal requirements. We …
Read more
Any new legacy process must command the trust and confidence of those engaging with it. Although no scheme will ever command universal support, the Government must have at the heart of its thinking the objective of maximising trust across the traditions and ensuring full compliance with all legal requirements. We are pleased that the Government has promised to put the needs of those most affected at “the heart of the process”, but we note that no further detail has been provided on how families will be able to engage with the new process. The evidence that we received suggests that the Government can learn lessons from Operation Kenova when developing its own legacy system.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government welcomed the committee's observations and reaffirmed its commitment to information recovery, stating it would carefully consider all options to ensure a fit-for-purpose process that maximizes information for victims and families.
Read full response →
Northern Ireland Executive
Northern Ireland Office