Source · Select Committees · Northern Ireland Affairs Committee
Recommendation 2
2
Too many key questions remain regarding how the proposed new institution would operate and function.
Conclusion
Too many key questions remain regarding how the proposed new institution would operate and function. It is deeply worrying that since 18 March, when the Government announced its new legacy proposals, it has been unable to provide any further policy detail. While covid-19 has presented a challenge across government, policy development has continued across Whitehall, and the Northern Ireland Office has digital platforms to facilitate its work. The information lacuna is especially regrettable given the sensitivity of the issues and the period since many of the events occurred. Delay and uncertainty perpetuate an unacceptable situation that has already gone on too long. (Paragraph 6) Stormont House Agreement
Government Response
Acknowledged
HM Government
Acknowledged
I am writing following the publication, on 26 October, of the Northern Ireland Affairs Committee’s interim report, “Addressing the Legacy of Northern Ireland’s Past: the Government’s New proposals—Third Report of Session 2019–21.” I would like to take this opportunity to thank the Committee for the work they have taken forward and to recognise the contributions of the many witnesses and others who have provided written or oral evidence, particularly given the challenging circumstances of the past year. The Government will continue to take these contributions and the work of the Committee into account as we move forward in delivering on our commitment to deal with the legacy of the Troubles in a way which focuses on reconciliation, delivers for victims, and ends the cycle of re-investigations that has failed victims and veterans alike. The Committee will be aware that legacy reform remains a matter of ongoing sensitive policy development and engagement. While it is clear that there is room for further constructive dialogue in a number of areas, there are also a number of key issues on which we are in agreement.