Select committee: Foreign Affairs Committee

Recommendation 11

Third Report: Flying Home: The FCO’s consular response to the COVID-19 pandemic Published 28 Jul 2020 Paragraph 32 Addressed to Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
Recommendation (the committee's words)
The failure of the FCO to provide clear advice on what would happen on arrival to the UK caused many travellers a great deal of unnecessary anxiety. The FCO should give clear advice on the situation on the ground in the UK, this would go a long way to alleviate the worries of travellers returning to the UK.

From: Foreign Affairs Committee, Third Report: Flying Home: The FCO’s consular response to the COVID-19 pandemic (HC 643), paragraph 32, 28 July 2020

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 23 October 2020 (deadline 28 September 2020).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government recognises concerns about the consular response and accepts some recommendations, but disputes that the report fully represents what was done, or how quickly, and disagrees on reliance on commercial flights.

  • On the £75 million repatriation funding, the government says it does "not accept the suggestion that unspent funds meant those in need did not receive the repatriation support that they needed". If further flights are needed it "will look to find the funds within the department" and, "if appropriate", apply to the HM Treasury Reserve.
  • On commercial flights, it says that keeping commercial routes open was needed because repatriating 1.3 million people by charter "would have required over 4000 charter flights". It ran charters where there were no commercial flights available or other ways to bring home British travellers.
  • It agrees with the committee on crowdfunding: the reference "has been removed" from internal and public guidance. On loans, it says it "will always work to agree flexible repayment plans tailored to individual circumstances" and can extend repayment beyond six months where someone is actively repaying.
  • On answerphone messages, it agrees this is "a priority" and is creating a "call-off arrangement" with its supplier, which it "expect[s]" to be in place by the end of October 2020. It does not agree that social media was used at the expense of tailored support.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error