Select Committee · Foreign Affairs Committee

The Wagner Group and beyond: proxy Private Military Companies

Status: Closed Opened: 30 Mar 2022 Closed: 26 Apr 2024 19 recommendations 20 conclusions 1 report

This inquiry will explore the challenge posed by Private Military Companies (PMCs) that some states use as proxies in conflict and to destabilise fragile countries. It will also examine how the UK Government is responding. The inquiry will focus particularly on the Wagner Group. Read the call for evidence for more details about the inquiry

Clear

Reports

1 report
Title HC No. Published Items Response
Seventh Report - Guns for gold: the Wagner Network exposed HC 167 26 Jul 2023 39 Responded

Recommendations & Conclusions

4 items
6 Conclusion Seventh Report - Guns for gold: the Wag… Acknowledged

Wagner Network's links to the Russian state confirmed, but countries may still engage.

Over the past year and a half, the Russia-Ukraine war eroded the Wagner Network’s deniability and Prigozhin’s public arguments with the Russian Ministry of Defence confirmed the network’s long-suspected links to the Russian state. The brutality of its fighters in Ukraine is appalling but not atypical. So long as the … Read more

Government response AI summary
The government partially agrees with the observation, stating its International Development Strategy addresses conflict and fragility in low-income countries, with ODA allocations prioritising these areas, and an additional £2.5 billion over two years for refugees, while noting no plans to reintroduce the FCAS spending commitment.
Read full response →
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
11 Conclusion Seventh Report - Guns for gold: the Wag… Acknowledged

Government's delayed and limited focus on Wagner beyond Ukraine is regrettable.

The Wagner Network began its activities in 2014. By early 2022, when the Government began to invest greater resource in understanding the network, Wagner fighters had already undertaken military deployments in at least seven countries. It is deeply regrettable that it took this long, and that the Government continues to … Read more

Government response AI summary
The government partially agrees with the conclusion, accepting the need to tackle Wagner and the value of declassifying intelligence where feasible. It highlights its efforts to expose Wagner's activities and states it has recently enhanced communication channels, particularly in Africa, to address the network's evolution.
Read full response →
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
22 Conclusion Seventh Report - Guns for gold: the Wag… Acknowledged

Significant opportunity exists to disrupt the Wagner Network amid its uncertain future.

There is an opportunity to disrupt the Wagner Network at a time when its future is uncertain.

Government response AI summary
The government agrees there is an opportunity to tackle Wagner and describes existing efforts such as coordinated action with partners, declassification and sharing of intelligence, and stepped-up communications to expose the group's activities.
Read full response →
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
29 Conclusion Seventh Report - Guns for gold: the Wag… Acknowledged

Wagner Network effectively reconfigures and its activities will continue due to value.

The last decade has shown that the Wagner Network is highly effective at reconfiguring itself. We expect its activities to continue in some form, as they are too valuable, especially financially, to the Russian state to be lost. The question is not just what happens to the Wagner Network but … Read more

Government response AI summary
The government agrees with the committee's assessment of the Wagner Network's adaptability and destabilizing impact, noting the broader trend of Russia using Private Military Security Companies as proxies. It commits to paying close attention to the network's evolution and exploiting opportunities to apply further pressure.
Read full response →
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office

Oral evidence sessions

3 sessions
Date Witnesses
6 Feb 2023 Ben Fender OBE · Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, Hazel Cameron · Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office, Leo Docherty · Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office View ↗
1 Nov 2022 Jason McCue · McCue Jury & Partners, Mikhail Khodorkovsky, Professor Jason Blazakis · Middlebury Institute of International Studies View ↗
19 Apr 2022 Christo Grozev · Bellingcat, Dr Sean McFate · Atlantic Council, Dr Sorcha MacLeod · University of Copenhagen View ↗

Who gave evidence

9 witnesses
WitnessOrganisationSessions
Ben Fender OBE · Director, Eastern Europe and Central Asia Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office 1
Christo Grozev · Executive Director and ex-Russia investigator Bellingcat 1
Dr Sean McFate · Senior Fellow Atlantic Council 1
Dr Sorcha MacLeod · Associate Professor University of Copenhagen 1
Hazel Cameron · Director, EU and Gibraltar Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office 1
Jason McCue · Senior Partner McCue Jury & Partners 1
Leo Docherty · Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Europe) Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office 1
Mikhail Khodorkovsky 1
Professor Jason Blazakis · Executive Director of the Center on Terrorism, Ex… Middlebury Institute of International Studies 1

Correspondence

1 letter
DateDirectionTitle
15 Mar 2023 Correspondence with the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Europe) followi…