Recommendations & Conclusions
8 items
9
Recommendation
3rd Report - The UK and the Antarctic e…
Accepted in Part
The UK’s expertise in polar science presents a valuable opportunity for strengthening international collaboration. We recommend expanding joint research efforts, particularly in areas such as marine conservation, land ecology, and ice sheet modelling. By contributing robust scientific data, the UK can play a pivotal role in shaping informed decisions on …
Read more
The UK’s expertise in polar science presents a valuable opportunity for strengthening international collaboration. We recommend expanding joint research efforts, particularly in areas such as marine conservation, land ecology, and ice sheet modelling. By contributing robust scientific data, the UK can play a pivotal role in shaping informed decisions on climate change and environmental protection within the Antarctic Treaty System. (Recommendation, Paragraph 73)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government accepts the recommendation in part, citing current involvement in significant international science projects like Thwaites Glacier, BIOPOLE, and SWAIS2C collaborations. They state that any further expansion of these efforts will be contingent on future budget allocations.
Read full response →
14
Conclusion
3rd Report - The UK and the Antarctic e…
Accepted in Part
The accelerated melting of Antarctic ice is becoming one of the most significant drivers of global sea level rise, which poses an increasing threat to coastal communities worldwide, including in the UK. To enhance the accuracy of sea level rise projections and develop more effective climate adaptation and risk management …
Read more
The accelerated melting of Antarctic ice is becoming one of the most significant drivers of global sea level rise, which poses an increasing threat to coastal communities worldwide, including in the UK. To enhance the accuracy of sea level rise projections and develop more effective climate adaptation and risk management strategies, it is imperative for the UK to significantly expand its research efforts in Antarctica. This should include targeted studies on glaciers and ice sheets, focusing on their current and future contributions to sea level rise. The data derived from these research efforts should inform the formulation of the Government’s policies and protective measures for vulnerable UK coastal areas and provide a scientific foundation for long-term adaptation strategies. (Recommendation, Paragraph 100)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government partially accepts, acknowledging the importance of research and existing efforts, but states that any significant expansion of Antarctic research would depend on future budget allocations and other R&D priorities.
Read full response →
26
Recommendation
3rd Report - The UK and the Antarctic e…
Accepted in Part
To address this urgent gap, the Government should increase long-term core funding to the British Antarctic Survey to support its terrestrial biodiversity research. Investment should prioritise the recruitment, training, and retention of ecological specialists, ensuring sustained expertise in Antarctic terrestrial ecosystems. (Recommendation, Paragraph 143) 98
Read more
To address this urgent gap, the Government should increase long-term core funding to the British Antarctic Survey to support its terrestrial biodiversity research. Investment should prioritise the recruitment, training, and retention of ecological specialists, ensuring sustained expertise in Antarctic terrestrial ecosystems. (Recommendation, Paragraph 143) 98
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government partially accepts, explaining that Antarctic research priorities have evolved beyond traditional terrestrial ecosystems and that funding for talented researchers and competitive project grants is available through existing mechanisms like UKRI and NERC, but does not commit to increasing *core* funding specifically for BAS's …
Read full response →
59
Conclusion
3rd Report - The UK and the Antarctic e…
Accepted in Part
The UK must be properly equipped to address the major research priorities in the polar regions. Antarctic research plays a critical role in advancing global understanding of climate change, ocean systems, and polar ecosystems, issues that affect lives and economies far beyond the region. Despite the UK’s world-leading capabilities, the …
Read more
The UK must be properly equipped to address the major research priorities in the polar regions. Antarctic research plays a critical role in advancing global understanding of climate change, ocean systems, and polar ecosystems, issues that affect lives and economies far beyond the region. Despite the UK’s world-leading capabilities, the Committee heard clear and consistent evidence that insufficient and uncertain funding is the chief limiting factor to delivering impactful science. Without increased investment, the UK risks undermining its ability to contribute to global environmental monitoring and decision-making at a time when such leadership is urgently needed. (Conclusion, Paragraph 260) 104
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government partially accepts this conclusion, noting it has published guidance for awarding ten-year R&D funding to provide certainty to research organizations. It also highlights significant ongoing investments in Antarctic research and infrastructure by UKRI and NERC, including around £60 million annually for interdisciplinary research …
Read full response →
67
Recommendation
3rd Report - The UK and the Antarctic e…
Accepted in Part
Given the demonstrated success of bilateral funding agreements, such as those between UKRI-NERC and partners in the US, Brazil, Luxembourg, and Norway, we recommend that the Government work with the Natural Environment Research Council to expand these reciprocal arrangements. In particular, new partnerships should be developed with key polar research …
Read more
Given the demonstrated success of bilateral funding agreements, such as those between UKRI-NERC and partners in the US, Brazil, Luxembourg, and Norway, we recommend that the Government work with the Natural Environment Research Council to expand these reciprocal arrangements. In particular, new partnerships should be developed with key polar research nations including Australia, New Zealand, Germany, Sweden, and South Korea. These countries offer complementary expertise, operational capabilities, and scientific priorities that align with the UK’s research interests in Antarctica. Broader collaboration will strengthen the UK’s leadership in polar science and maximise the impact of its scientific contributions. (Recommendation, Paragraph 282
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government partially accepts the recommendation, noting existing strong partnerships with some listed nations (Australia, Germany, Sweden) and opportunities through Horizon Europe, but acknowledges that partnerships with South Korea and New Zealand are less developed.
Read full response →
69
Recommendation
3rd Report - The UK and the Antarctic e…
Accepted in Part
We recognise the importance of the Antarctica InSync programme, where 26 nations will collaborate during the 2028–29 Antarctic season to conduct synchronous climate measurements across land, sea, air, and space, with results presented during the International Polar Year in 2032–33. To ensure full UK participation and leadership in Antarctica InSync, …
Read more
We recognise the importance of the Antarctica InSync programme, where 26 nations will collaborate during the 2028–29 Antarctic season to conduct synchronous climate measurements across land, sea, air, and space, with results presented during the International Polar Year in 2032–33. To ensure full UK participation and leadership in Antarctica InSync, we recommend that the Government and the Natural Environment Research Council establish long-term funding mechanisms for the project that extend beyond annual or short-term spending reviews. Stable, multi-year funding will allow UK researchers to contribute effectively to planning, fieldwork, and data analysis, and will help maintain the UK’s global standing in Antarctic science during this landmark international initiative. (Recommendation, Paragraph 284)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government partially accepts the recommendation, stating NERC is considering how the UK can best participate in Antarctica InSync. They highlight that NERC research institutes like BAS already receive long-term funding, suggesting existing mechanisms support some elements, but they do not commit to establishing new …
Read full response →
71
Conclusion
3rd Report - The UK and the Antarctic e…
Accepted in Part
We have heard strong concerns from the Antarctic research community about the Natural Environment Research Council’s (NERC) shift to a “one ship plus” model and the reduction of the research fleet from two vessels to one. This has already led to substantial delays to Antarctic marine research projects, and we …
Read more
We have heard strong concerns from the Antarctic research community about the Natural Environment Research Council’s (NERC) shift to a “one ship plus” model and the reduction of the research fleet from two vessels to one. This has already led to substantial delays to Antarctic marine research projects, and we are concerned about the longer-term implications for UK polar science. While we recognise that the RRS Sir David Attenborough may at times undertake logistical tasks, particularly when aligned with research voyages, we do not consider its routine use as a supply vessel to be the most effective deployment of such a highly advanced scientific platform. Within NERC’s “one vessel plus” model, many vessels can support cargo transport in Antarctica, but very few offer the specialist research capabilities of the RRS Sir David Attenborough. We therefore consider it more scientifically effective to charter logistics vessels where possible, and to prioritise the use of the RRS Sir David Attenborough for dedicated research. (Recommendation, Paragraph 294)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government partially accepts the recommendation, defending the RRS Sir David Attenborough's operating model which uses its increased capacity for both scientific and logistical activities efficiently. They state that the UK already uses a flexible approach, including chartering other vessels, but affirm the SDA's dual …
Read full response →
72
Conclusion
3rd Report - The UK and the Antarctic e…
Accepted in Part
By 2030, the Natural Environment Research Council should conduct a comprehensive review of the “single vessel plus” policy, evaluating its impact on Antarctic and Arctic marine science, particularly regarding the delays to approved research projects. The review should focus on optimising the use of the RRS Sir David Attenborough, assessing …
Read more
By 2030, the Natural Environment Research Council should conduct a comprehensive review of the “single vessel plus” policy, evaluating its impact on Antarctic and Arctic marine science, particularly regarding the delays to approved research projects. The review should focus on optimising the use of the RRS Sir David Attenborough, assessing the need for additional vessels, and addressing scheduling conflicts that impede research. Additionally, it should consider the costs and logistics of chartering additional ships since the introduction of the policy and offer recommendations to improve scheduling efficiency, resource allocation, and overall productivity in Antarctic and Arctic missions. (Recommendation, Paragraph 295) 107
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government partially accepts, detailing existing annual and long-term review frameworks (like the Cruise Programme Review Group, CPEB, and BAS forward looks) that already address aspects of science delivery, scheduling, resource allocation, and alternative vessels. They do not commit to a new comprehensive review of …
Read full response →