The Committee is undertaking an inquiry into community mental health services. The inquiry will examine what good looks like from the perspective of service users and their families/carers. The Committee would like the inquiry to shine a light on case studies of innovative practice and high-quality care across the country, and to undertake meaningful and …
| Title | HC No. | Published | Items | Response |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4th Report - Community Mental Health Services | HC 566 | 2 Dec 2025 | 32 | Overdue |
Timely access to mental health care is not just a matter of convenience— it is a matter of safety, dignity, and equity. Delays in care can lead to preventable crises, greater distress, poorer outcomes, and higher costs to the system. The severity gap, where people fall between high and low …
Continuity of care is a necessity for people with severe mental illness. It is essential to the delivery of high-quality care. When it is present, it prevents crisis, builds trust, and supports recovery. When it is absent, it fragments support, burdens families, and puts lives at risk. This continuity must …
Service users, their families, carers and loved ones have been clear: high- quality care must be person-centred, responsive to the full range of needs individuals experience, and ensure involvement of their wider networks. Current services too often fall short—focusing narrowly on diagnosis, overlooking physical health, and failing to support people …
Experiences of stigma, discrimination, and lack of culturally appropriate or personalised support were frequently reported, particularly by racialised communities, neurodivergent individuals, and those with disabilities. 74 Where care was described as high-quality, it was inclusive, responsive, and tailored to individual needs. Equity must be integral to the delivery of high- …
Services shaped and delivered with, and by, people with lived experience of mental illness are more trusted, accessible, and effective. Meaningful co-production—where power is shared and lived experience is valued—is essential to high-quality care. Peer support, in particular, is a vital part of recovery both for service users and peer …
Our conclusions in this Chapter try to reflect what service users told us they wanted. This must be reflected in service design. As new models of care are commissioned and implemented, these must be co-designed with experts by experience to ensure services deliver the high quality care such users need …
We believe the Community Mental Health Framework sets out the right vision for Community Mental Health Services. However, evidence submitted to this inquiry reveals significant gaps between its ambitions and its implementation across England. We want to see a renewed commitment by the Government to realise the Framework’s ambitions. As …
We recommend that the Government changes its current approach and commission an independent and comprehensive evaluation of how the Community Mental Health Framework has been implemented and its impact by the end of the financial year. This should not be seen as drawing a line under the Framework, but as …
Delivering real change and achieving parity of esteem in mental health care requires dismantling the current fragmented system and reimagining service design and delivery. The 24/7 Neighbourhood Mental Health Centre 75 pilots seem to be genuinely transformative. The experience from Trieste, and early evidence from Barnsley Street, show that radically …
We believe there should be a 24/7 Neighbourhood Mental Health Centre in every community. (Recommendation, Paragraph 92)
The design of these centres must be informed by the learnings from the pilot programme so they can be tailored to the needs of their communities. In order for the learnings to be robust, the 24/7 Neighbourhood Mental Health Centre pilot programme must be extended by at least 12 months …
The Government should develop and publish a clear roadmap for the national scale-up of the pilot programme. In its response to this report, we expect the Government to state how the roadmap will be developed and the timeframe for publication. (Recommendation, Paragraph 94)
We welcome the commitment in the 10 Year Health Plan to develop a Modern Service Framework (MSF) for mental health, with a focus on the needs of people with severe and enduring mental illness in particular. However, without a clear timeline for publication, this work risks slipping down the political …
We would also like the Government to set out how people with lived experience will be involved in its development and how the MSF will be integrated with wider systems of support including those provided by the VCFSE sector and local authorities. It is essential that the MSF takes full …
Community Mental Health Services (CMHS) are integral to supporting people with severe mental illness across health, social care, and with their wider social needs. Evidence to this inquiry shows that integrated models of support within multi-disciplinary teams—such as co-located teams and Individual Placement and Support—can improve outcomes and reduce system …
In some areas, the emphasis on care coordination may have been lost through the rollout of the CMHF. We recommend that NHS England publish clear guidance on the role of key workers to ensure all service users have access to a named individual responsible for coordinating their care. (Recommendation, Paragraph …
Despite nearly a decade of commitments, the transition from Children and Young People’s Mental Health Services (CYPMHS) to Adult Mental Health Services (AMHS)—including Community Mental Health Services (CMHS)— remains a cliff edge and continues to fall short of what young people need. The Government, NHS England, and Integrated Care Boards …
We heard that one way to track progress on integration would be through the establishment of national access and waiting time standards. The absence of national standards contributes to inconsistent access and undermines parity with physical health. NHS England should publish and implement these standards as a matter of urgency. …
NHS England should reinstate the annual physical health check target for people with severe mental illness (SMI) in operational planning guidance. This target has driven significant progress and remains essential for accountability, monitoring co-morbidities, and reducing preventable deaths. Building on this, the Modern Service Framework must include physical health outcomes …
Six months on from our Adult Social Care: The Cost of Inaction report, we are frustrated the Government is yet to review the structure and level of NHS investment in the Better Care Fund (BCF). Whilst we welcome a commitment to reform the BCF in the coming 2026–27 financial year, …
The Government should expand the use of Section 75 of the NHS Act 2006 by enabling and encouraging more widespread pooling of budgets between NHS bodies and local authorities. This expansion should support the inclusion of a broader range of services—such as housing and education— within Section 75 arrangements to …
VCFSE organisations make a vital contribution to integrated, person-centred care for people with severe mental illness, yet they are not consistently treated as equal third partners by commissioners and providers. This must change. Genuine partnership requires co-production from the outset and equitable access to funding, including for smaller and peer-led …
The Department and NHE England should support ICBs to move away from short-term commissioning cycles to multi-year contracts for VCFSE organisations supporting the delivery of CMHS. The publication of the Strategic Commissioning Framework presents an opportunity to enable the bold action needed by ICBs to harness the value and potential …
NHS England and Integrated Care Boards should prioritise the development of alliance models that embed voluntary, community, faith and social enterprise (VCFSE) organisations in the design and delivery of community mental health services. This should include clear expectations for co- production from the outset and mechanisms to ensure smaller and …
In order for the neighbourhood pilots to realise the potential of the innovative model of care they are trialling, the Government should support the pilot sites to address challenges with digital interoperability, for example through sharing of learning and best practise. These learnings should then be collated to support future …
We echo Lord Darzi’s assessment that there is a fundamental problem in the distribution of resources between mental and physical health. While we recognise the welcome increase in real-terms mental health spend this year, we were disappointed to see the overall share go down. We hope this is a one-off …
While integrating Service Development Funding into core funding may offer flexibility, we believe it also introduces uncertainty around continued prioritisation and investment in these services, and could have a detrimental impact upon the progress of the transformation of services. We urge the Government and NHS England to monitor this impact, …
We recommend the Mental Health Investment Standard be retained beyond 2025–26. The Government should commit to the Standard by the end of this calendar year to give systems greater certainty. Then, the Government should legislate to make the Standard a statutory requirement, clearly defining its scope, measures for evaluation and …
Staff retention is important for continuity of care for people with SMI. As part of the forthcoming 10 Year Workforce Plan, the Government should set out specific measures to reduce burnout, including action on caseload management and access to supervision; improve pay and progression opportunities for CMHS staff, including those …
It is vital that the Government ensures the 10 Year Workforce Plan delivers for Community Mental Health Services. Workforce growth must be aligned with service transformation to ensure that new roles are sustainable and integrated across settings. This must take account of all of the partners involved in the delivery …
Social workers make an essential contribution to tackling the broader determinants of health and mental health outcomes, yet we heard they are often deprioritised when budgetary pressures arise. The Government should recognise the important role of mental health social workers by including them in the upcoming 10 Year Workforce Plan. …
The sector has called for a Mental Health Commissioner to address concerns about a lack of accountability across the mental health system. The Government has said it does not want to take this approach. We ask it to set out proposals to strengthen accountability, including for implementing the Patient and …
| Date | Witnesses | |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Sep 2025 | Caroline Allnutt · Department of Health and Social Care, Gareth Harry · NHS England, The Baroness Merron · Department of Health and Social Care | View ↗ |
| 21 May 2025 | Darlington Kudakwashe Zvionere · Black Minds Matter UK, Janine Smith · Navigo Health and Social Care CIC, Karyn Kirkpatrick · KeyRing Living Support Networks, Michael Crilly · Social Health & Community Inclusion at Life Rooms (Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust), Mr Abdirahim Hassan · Coffee Afrik CIC, Mr Jake Mills · Chasing the Stigma, Professor Belinda Lennox · University of Oxford, Professor Stephen Pilling · University College London | View ↗ |
| 23 Apr 2025 | Christian Taylor, Christina Taylor, Councillor Lorraine Francis · Bristol City Council, Duncan Tree · Association of Mental Health Providers, Penny East · Think Ahead, Peter Devlin · Essex County Council, Stephen Parker · Turning Point | View ↗ |
| 12 Mar 2025 | Dr Emma Tiffin · Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Integrated Care Board, Dr Lade Smith CBE · Royal College of Psychiatrists, Elizabeth Sutton, Eve Mair, Jane Yeandle · Somerset NHS Foundation Trust, Rt Hon Sir Norman Lamb · South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Samantha Allen · North East and North Cumbria Integrated Care Board, Steve Forsyth · Rotherham Doncaster and South Humber NHS Foundation Trust | View ↗ |
| 12 Feb 2025 | Chris Frederick, Dr Courtney Buckler · National Survivor User Network, Francesca, Harry Dyson · The McPin Foundation, Ian Callaghan, Lucy Schonegevel · Rethink Mental Illness, Miss Kadra Abdinasir · Centre for Mental Health | View ↗ |
| Date | Direction | Title |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Mar 2026 | — | Correspondence from DHSC - Mental Health Expected Spend |
| 19 Mar 2026 | — | Correspondence from DHSC SofS - Mental Health Expected Spend |
| 12 Nov 2025 | — | Correspondence from Baroness Merron re Follow up on 10 September session |