Source · SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman)

A Dentist in the Greater Glasgow and Clyde NHS Board

SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) Not Upheld Reference 201105207 Sector Health Category clinical treatment / diagnosis Decided 01 November 2012

Full decision

Summary

Mr C complained about the treatment he received from his dentist in 2009. He had problems with a crown on one of his teeth. He said that the dentist told him that it could no longer support a crown, it had to be removed and a bridge structure from a neighbouring tooth would be a remedy. The tooth was removed with difficulty (it took twenty minutes) and a temporary denture was fitted. Particles of bone later broke through the surface of the gum. Nine months later Mr C returned to the practice and saw another dentist as his had left. The new dentist said that the suggestion of a crown and bridge structure was not practicable and that it would cost several thousand pounds to rectify the problem privately. Mr C was shocked at the cost as he had expected that treatment costs would be in the region of several hundred pounds. He complained that the dentist failed to provide him with a reasonable standard of dental treatment and a treatment plan, or to explain the likely costs prior to carrying out the dental treatment.

After taking independent advice from our dental adviser, we found that that the dentist's decision to extract the tooth and the extraction itself were reasonable. We also found evidence that Mr C was provided with a treatment plan of the extraction and replacement denture, and about costs. Although we found no treatment plan for any potential bridgework discussed between Mr C and the dentist, we considered that this was also reasonable. This is because any further work that might be required would normally be discussed later with the patient when they returned for the treatment. We did not uphold Mr C's complaints, but we made recommendations about two related points that we noted during our investigation.

Recommendations

We recommended that the dentist: consider taking preoperative x-rays of teeth that are going to be extracted; and ensure all treatment plans are signed by the patient and scanned into the dental records.

Related reading

View Decision Report 201105207 as a PDF (13.03 KB) Updated: March 13, 2018

View original on SPSO (Scottish Publ… website

Other decisions involving A Dentist in the Greater Glasgow and Cl…

Reference Date Summary Outcome
201601001 01 Jul 2016 Ms C, a voluntary agency worker, complained on behalf of Mr A that the dental treatment he had received was … Upheld
201601002 01 Jul 2016 Ms C, a voluntary agency worker, complained on behalf of Mr A that the dental care and treatment he had … Not Upheld
201508583 01 Jul 2016 Ms C, who works for a voluntary agency, complained on behalf of Mr A that the care and treatment he … Not Upheld
201101552 01 Nov 2012 Mrs C complained on behalf of her mother (Mrs A) about the care and treatment Mrs A received from her … Not Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation