Source · SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman)

A Dentist in the Greater Glasgow and Clyde NHS Board

SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) Not Upheld Reference 201101552 Sector Health Category clinical treatment / diagnosis Decided 01 November 2012

Full decision

Summary

Mrs C complained on behalf of her mother (Mrs A) about the care and treatment Mrs A received from her dentist. Mrs A attended the dentist in pain after a filling fell out. The dentist took an x-ray and removed a nerve. He made an appointment for a couple of weeks later to extract some teeth. Unfortunately, the pain did not get any better and Mrs A had to go back a further three times for treatment. However, before the date on which the extractions were scheduled, she was admitted to hospital, where it was found that her windpipe was obstructed by a large abscess. Mrs A had emergency surgery, and needed a tracheotomy (an operation to insert a tube into the windpipe) to assist with her breathing.

Mrs C complained that the dentist did not treat her mother appropriately and that had he done so she would not have deteriorated to such an extent. After taking advice from two of our dental advisers, however, our investigation found that the dentist's decisions about prescribing antibiotics to Mrs A were reasonable, as was the care and treatment provided.

Related reading

View Decision Report 201101552 as a PDF (11.23 KB) Updated: March 13, 2018

View original on SPSO (Scottish Publ… website

Other decisions involving A Dentist in the Greater Glasgow and Cl…

Reference Date Summary Outcome
201601001 01 Jul 2016 Ms C, a voluntary agency worker, complained on behalf of Mr A that the dental treatment he had received was … Upheld
201601002 01 Jul 2016 Ms C, a voluntary agency worker, complained on behalf of Mr A that the dental care and treatment he had … Not Upheld
201508583 01 Jul 2016 Ms C, who works for a voluntary agency, complained on behalf of Mr A that the care and treatment he … Not Upheld
201105207 01 Nov 2012 Mr C complained about the treatment he received from his dentist in 2009. He had problems with a crown on … Not Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation