Source · PSOW (Public Services Ombudsman for Wales)

Wrexham County Borough Council

PSOW (Public Services Ombudsman for Wales) Resolved / Early Resolution Reference PSOW-202304335 Sector Local Government Category Planning and Building Control Decided 17 October 2023

View Wrexham County Borough Council scorecard

Full decision

Mr & Mrs W complained that Wrexham County Borough Council had failed to follow the correct process when granting planning permission for a building on the land adjacent to theirs.

The Ombudsman found that whilst the Council had been in contact with Mr & Mrs W, their concerns were not logged as a formal complaint. She said that this caused frustration and uncertainty to Mr & Mrs W. She decided to settle the complaint without an investigation.

The Ombudsman sought and gained the Council’s agreement to write to Mr & Mrs W with an apology and explanation for the failure to log their concerns as a formal complaint, offer to pay £50 redress for the time and trouble in making their complaint to the Ombudsman and issue a Stage 2 complaint response within 4 weeks.

View original on PSOW (Public Servic… website

Other decisions involving Wrexham County Borough Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
PSOW-202200187 The Ombudsman received a complaint that a Member (“the Member”) of Wrexham County Borough Council (“the Council”) had breached the … Not Upheld
PSOW-202506043 21 Jan 2026 Mr C complained that Wrexham Council had refused to repair a damaged water pipe, leading to dampness in his property. … Resolved / Early Resolution
PSOW-202501004 07 Aug 2025 Mr C complained that Wrexham County Borough Council failed to take enforcement action in relation to a development adjacent to … Resolved / Early Resolution
PSOW-202500279 22 Jul 2025 Miss A complained about how the Council had determined her application for a disabled facilities grant (“DFG”). Miss A said … Resolved / Early Resolution
PSOW-202305850/202305851/202305851 18 Jul 2025 The Complainant, who held a governance role within Wrexham County Council (“the Council”), alleged that 3 Council members (“the 3 … Not Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation