The Council was not at fault for its initial handling of Mr X’s homelessness application and housing register application. It accepted its homelessness duty to Mr X, offered him interim accommodation and properly assessed his housing priority. The Council was at fault for later delays in deciding whether it owed Mr X a main housing duty and medical priority. This caused Mr X uncertainty but did not impact Mr X’s homelessness or housing applications. The Council has agreed to apologise to Mr X.
Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)
Canterbury City Council
LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)
Upheld
Reference 26-002-787
Sector Housing
Category Allocations
Decided 16 July 2026
View Canterbury City Council scorecard
Original decision on the LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) website ↗
Publisher summary
Full decision text is not available in the index.
Read on the LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) website