Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Other Reference 25-015-053 Sector Transport And Highways Category Highway Repair And Maintenance Decided 06 October 2025

View Calderdale Council scorecard

Full decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate Mr B’s complaint that his car was damaged by a width restriction which the Council had not clearly signed. This is because it is reasonable for Mr B to pursue his compensation claim by taking the Council to court.

The complaint

Mr B complains his vehicle was damaged by a width restriction. Mr B says the Council had failed to put in place sufficient signage and markings to alert motorists to this width restriction. Mr B complains the Council has wrongly refused his compensation claim for his repair costs which were over £1,100.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.

The Act says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by Mr B.

I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

We will not normally investigate a complaint that a person’s vehicle has been damaged as a result of a local highways authority not maintaining a highway safely. This is because in effect such complaints are that an organisation has been negligent. Our role is to consider complaints of administrative fault. Negligence claims are best decided by an organisation’s insurers, and if needed, the courts.

Mr B may pursue his claim by taking the Council to court. Deciding whether an organisation has been negligent usually involves looking rigorously, and in a structured way at evidence as only the court can to make its findings.

Only the courts can decide if the Council has been negligent, and if so, enforce an award of damages.

So, I would usually expect someone in Mr B’s position to seek a remedy in the courts. I find it is reasonable and proportionate to Mr B’s repair costs for Mr B to do this.

So, we will not investigate this complaint.

Final decision

We will not investigate Mr B’s complaint because it is reasonable for him to take the Council to court.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
25-014-444 Other
25-016-781 Other
25-011-385 Other
25-017-767 Other
25-012-722 Other
View all decisions for this organisation