Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

Mole Valley District Council

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Other Reference 25-015-016 Sector Planning Category Enforcement Decided 07 January 2026

View Mole Valley District Council scorecard

Full decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with a breach of planning control. This is because the complainant had the right to appeal to the Planning Inspector.

The complaint

Mr X has complained about how the Council dealt with a breach of planning control and the Council’s decision to take enforcement action against him. Mr X says the Council has not acted in line with its enforcement policy and its decision to take formal action was based on misleading and inaccurate information.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.

The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a government minister. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(b), as amended) The Planning Inspector acts on behalf of the responsible Government minister. The Planning Inspector considers appeals about: Delay – usually over eight weeks – by an authority in deciding an application for planning permission A decision to refuse planning permission Conditions placed on planning permission A planning enforcement notice.

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by Mr X and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

Mr X could have appealed to the Planning Inspector if he disagreed with the Council’s decision to take enforcement action against him.

Mr X has raised concerns about the Council’s enforcement investigation. But I consider the issues Mr X has raised are related to the decision to issue the enforcement notice which could have been appealed.

I consider it would have been reasonable for Mr X to have used his right to appeal. The Ombudsman will not usually investigate when someone had a right to appeal to the Planning Inspector, even if the appeal would not address all the issues complained about.

Final decision

We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because he had the right to appeal to the Planning Inspector.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving Mole Valley District Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
25-019-700 Other
25-012-178 Upheld
25-021-696 Other
25-006-268 Upheld
24-020-677 06 Nov 2025 Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about council tax charges. This is because part of the complaint is … Other
View all decisions for this organisation